Skip to main content

Designing Sociable CSCL Environments

Applying Interaction Design Principles

  • Chapter
What We Know About CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 3))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alben, L. (1996). Quality of experience: Defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions, 3(3), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alben, L. (1997). At the heart of interaction design. Design Management Journal, 8(3), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannan-Ritland, B., Bragg, W., & Collins, M. (in press). Linking theory, educational constructs, and instructional strategies. In P. Robinson & B. Bannan-Ritland (Eds.), Web-based computer conferencing. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.provost.harvard.edu/factech/factech01/BannanWB.pdf

  • Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1995). Theory into practice: How do we link? In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional Technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 100–112). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to studying and learning. Hawthorne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. (in press). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(3), 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolullo, R. (2001). Interaction design: More than the interface. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://bolullo.com/roberto/projects/id.pdf

  • Bradner, E., Kellogg, W., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of “Babble”: A field study of chat in the workplace. In S. Bødker, M. Kyng & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth European conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 139–158). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 18(2), 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. A., Fuller, R. M., Vician, C. (2002). Who’s afraid of the virtual world? The role of anxiety in computer-mediated communication usage and satisfaction (Tech. Rep. No. 117-2). Bloomington, ID: Indiana University, Kelley School of Business. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.bus.indiana.edu/ardennis/wp/tr117-2.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, E. J. (1994). Learning in computer conferenced context: The learners’ perspective. Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. (1994) Social desirability as a predictor of argumentativeness and communication apprehension. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied, 128(4), 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 30, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, R. H. (1996). Technologies, relations, and selves. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson & S. B. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 317–333). Cresshill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol 6 (pp. 191–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derks, D., Kreijns, K, & Bos, A. (2003). The effects of using e-language on social presence and uninhibited behaviour in CSCL environments for distance education: A theoretical framework. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A. J., Finlay, J. E., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (1998). Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., Dueber, B., & Hawley, C. L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C. J. Bonk & K.S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 51–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra-Erickson, E., Mackay, W., & Arnowitz, J. (2001). Perspectives: Trialogue on design (of). Interactions, 8(2), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S. S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flach, J. M., & Holden, J. G. (1998). The reality of experience: Gibson’s way. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 7, 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., & Ford, S. (2000). The building blocks of experience: An early framework for interaction designers. In D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Conference proceedings on designing interactive systems: Processes, practice, methods, and techniques (pp. 419–423). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G., & Lentini, M. (1995). Use of collaborative resources in a networked collaborative design environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(1). Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/voll/issuel/IMG_JCMC/ResourceUse.html

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum. (Original work published 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2&3), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallet, K., & Cummings, J. (1997). The virtual classroom as authentic experience: Collaborative, problem-based learning in a WWW environment. Proceedings of the annual conference on Distance teaching and learning: Competition-connection-collaboration (pp. 103–107). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (1991). Teaching by computer conferencing. In A. J. Miller (Ed.), Applications of computer conferencing to teacher education and human resource development (pp. 23–33). Proceedings from an international symposium on computer conferencing at the Ohio State University. Columbus, OH. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 337705)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (1993). Global networks: Computers and international communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, T. T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., et al. (1996). ACM SIGCHI curricula for human-computer interaction. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/cdg/

  • Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobaugh, C. F. (1997). Interactive strategies for collaborative learning. Proceedings of the annual conference on distance teaching and learning: Competition-connection-collaboration (pp. 121–125). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, E. A., Tang, J. C., & Morris, T. (1996). Piazza: A desktop environment supporting impromptu and planned interactions. In M. S. Ackerman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 315–324). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Herz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 174–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (1995). The nature and value of interaction in distance learning. (ACSDE Research Monograph No. 12, pp. 83–92). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (1988). Problems in defining the field of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, K. (1992). Competence: What is it and how can it be developed? In J. Lowyck, P. De Potter & J. Elen (Eds.), Instructional design: Implementation issues (pp. 111–122). Brussels, Belgium: IBM EducationCenter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 7–47). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In J. Galegher & R. E. Kraut (Eds.). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of group work (pp. 149–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Education Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–22. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_l_2002/v_l_2002.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2003). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the essentialcontexts of artifacts or on the proposition that ‘design’ is making sense (of things). Design Issues, 5(2), 9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombart, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html

  • Löwgren, J. (2001). From HCI to interaction design. In Q. Chen (Ed.), Human computer interaction: Issues and challenges (pp. 29–43). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwgren, J. (2002). Just how far beyond HCI is interaction design. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/002589.php

  • Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality in computer-supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994a). Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994b). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (p. 25–62). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2001). Heuristics for user interface design. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html

  • Norman, D. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2002). Emotion & design: Attractive things work better. Interactions, 9(4), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines (pp. 37–62). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, M., Suthers, D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Belvedere: Stimulating students’ critical discussion. In I. Katz, R. Mack & L. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference companion on human factors in computing systems (pp. 123–124). New York, NY: ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, E. R., & Sokoler, T. (1997). AROMA: Abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of the SlGCHl conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 51–58). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, R. (2001). So you want to be an interaction designer. Newsletter. 2001(6). Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.cooper.com/newsletters/2001_06/2001_06_newsletter.htm

  • Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L. (2000). Operationalizing social interaction in computer conferencing. Proceedings of the I6th annual conference of the Canadian Association for Distance Education. Quebec City, Canada. Retrieved February 28, 2003 from http://www.ulaval.ca/aced2000cade/english/proceedings.html

  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002) Exploring social communication in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. de Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuemie, M. J., Van der Straaten P., Krijn, M., & Van der Mast, C. A. P. G. (2001). Research on presence in VR: A survey. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(2), 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedroff, N. (2001). Experience design. Indianapolis, IN: New readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musing on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence, 1, 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E. C. (Ed.). (1984). Competences: Inquiries into its meaning and acquisition in educational settings. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller, A. L. (1999). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Unpublished master thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller, A. L, Lesgold, A., Linton, F., & Goodman, B. (1999). What makes peer interaction effective? Modeling effective communication in an intelligent CSCL, In S. E. Brennan, A. Giboin & D. Traum (Eds), Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems: Papers from the AIII Fall Symposium (Technical Report FS-99-03, pp. 116–123). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the internet (pp. 35–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storck, J., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in video conferences? Human Communication Research, 22(2), 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1997). From interactions to integrations: A reflection on the future of HCI. Keynote address at the sixth IFIP international conference on human-computer interaction (Interact 97). Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.acs.org.au/president/1997/intrct97/suchman.htm

  • Suthers, D, & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion. In J. Schnase & E. Cunnius (Eds.), Computer supported cooperative learning (pp. 341–348). Bloomington, IN: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammelin, M. (1998). From telepresence to social presence: The role of presence in a network-based learning environment. In S. Tella (Eds.), Aspects of media education: Vol. 8. Strategic imperatives in the information age (pp. 219–231). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Media Education Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2001, June) Why is interaction design so important? In the Bubble. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.doorsofperception.com/In+the+Bubble/details/17/

  • Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 23(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western-Journal of Communication, 57, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34–49. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v2n1/pdf/v2n1_wegerif.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1999). The social affordances of e-mail. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 20(2), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., & Daly-Jones, O. (1994). Informal workplace communication: What is it like and how might we support it? In B. Adelson, S. Dumais & J. Ohlson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Celebrating interdependence (pp. 131–137). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. (2004). Designing Sociable CSCL Environments. In: Strijbos, JW., Kirschner, P.A., Martens, R.L. (eds) What We Know About CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7779-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7921-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics