This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, J. (1997). Professionalism in process: Mathematics teacher as researcher from a South African perspective. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 87–103.
Atweh, B., Christensen, C. & Dornan, L. (1998). Students as action researchers: Partnerships for social justice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 114–138). London: Routledge.
Atweh, B. & Dornan, L. (1997). SARUA: Project Training and Resource Manual. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Mathematics and Science Education, Queensland University of Technology.
Atweh, B., Forgasz, H. & Nebres, B. (2001). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Atweh, B. & Arias, M. (2001). Continuous in-service professional development of teachers and school change: Lessons from Mexico. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Socio-cultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 167–184). Mahwah, USA: Lawrence & Erlbaum.
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D. & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out by the teacher training authority 1995–6. London: School of Education, King’s College.
Baird, J. & Northfield, J. (Eds.) (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University Press.
Bishop, A.J. (1992). International perspectives on research in mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 710–723). New York: Macmillan.
Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. & Laborde, C. (Eds.) (1996). International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Breen, C. (1997). Teacher as researchers? In V. Zack, J. Mousley & C. Breen (Eds.), Developing practice: teachers’inquiry and educational change. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
Clements, M.A. & Ellerton, N. (1996). Mathematics education research: Past, present and future. Bangkok: UNESCO.
Crawford, K. & Adler, J. (1996). Teachers as researchers in mathematics education. In A.J. Bishop, K Clements,. C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde, (Eds), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1187–1206). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A. & Noddings, N. (Eds.) (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph 4.
Dias, A.L. (1999). Becoming critical mathematics educators through action research. Educational Action Research, 7(1), 15–32.
Fals-Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. Dialectical Anthrolopogy, 4(March), 33–55.
Fals-Borda, O. (2002). Research tensions and paradigm shifts in action sciences. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 46–55). Copenhagen: Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics.
Fennema, E. & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers’knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.
Gitlin, A. & Gore, J. (2000). [Re]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the education community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. USA, April 2000, New Orleans.
Grouws, D.A. (Ed.) (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? London: Falmer.
Grundy, S. (1998). Research partnerships: Principles and possibilities. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 37–46). London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays (William Mark Hohengarten, Trans.). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
Hargreaves, A. & Evans, R. (Eds.) (1997). Beyond educational reform. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Jacobsen, E. (1996). International co-operation in mathematics education. In A.J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde, (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1235–1256). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Kelly, A. & Lesh, R. (Eds.) (2000). Research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kemmis, S. (1995). Emancipatory aspirations in a post modern era. Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 133–167.
Kemmis, S. (1999). Action research. In J. Keeves & G. Labomski (Eds.), Issues in education research (pp. 150–160). New York: Pergamon.
Kemmis, S. & Wilkinson, M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 21–36). London: Routledge.
Kilpatrick, J. (1992). History of research in mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Macmillan.
Kilpatrick, J. (1999). Ich bin Europäisch. In K. Krainer & F. Goffree (Eds), On research in mathematics teacher education (pp. 49–68). Osnabrück, Germany: Forschungsinsitut für Mathematikdidaktik.
Lankshear, C. (1994). Literacy and empowerment: Discourse, power, critique. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 29(1), 59–72.
Malone, J., Atweh, B. & Northfield, J. (Eds.) (1998). Research and supervision in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McMahon, T. (1999). Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educational Action Research 7(1), 163–168.
McTaggart, R. (1991). Action research: A short modern history. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Mousely, J. (1992). Research in practice: Teachers as researchers. In B. Atweh & J. Watson (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 1988–1991 (pp.96–114). Brisbane, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia.
Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teaching. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 197–208). New York: Macmillan.
Passfield, R. (2001). Action learning for personal and organisational transformation. In S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield & P. Swepson (Eds.), Effective change management using action learning and action research (pp. 39–44). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University.
Revans, R. (1982). Action learning: New techniques for management. London: Blond & Briggs.
Romberg, T.A. (1988). Can teachers be professionals? In D.A. Grouws, T.A. Cooney & D. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on research of effective mathematics teaching, Vol 1 (pp. 224–244). Reston, USA: NCTM.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22,119–139.
Silver, E. & Kilpatrick, J. (1994). E Pluribus unum: Challenges of diversity in the future of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 734–754.
Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sprinthall, N.A., Reiman, A.J. & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.
Steffe, L., Thompson, P. & von Glaserfeld, E. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh. (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stenhouse, L (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann EducationalBooks.
Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–145). New York: Macmillan.
Troyna, B (1994). Blind faith? Empowerment and educational research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 4(1), 3–21.
Wiliam, D. (1998). A framework for thinking about research in mathematics and science education. In J. Malone, B. Atweh & J. Northfield (Eds.), Research and supervision in mathematics and science education (pp. 1–18). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zack, V., Mousley, J. & Breen, C. (Eds) (1997). Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2001). Action learning and action research: paradigms, praxis and programs. In S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield & P. Swepson (Eds.), Effective change management using action learning and action research (pp. 1–20). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atweh, B. (2004). Understanding for Changing and Changing for Understanding. In: Valero, P., Zevenbergen, R. (eds) Researching the Socio-Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library, vol 35. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7906-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7914-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive