Skip to main content

Agency and Leadership in Cooperatives

Endogenizing Organizational Commitment

  • Chapter
Vertical Markets and Cooperative Hierarchies

Abstract

The poor financial performance of a number of previously successful agricultural cooperatives appears to be connected to member commitment, which in turn is linked to the decisions made by the cooperatives’ leaders. While cooperative members should have an incentive to hire leaders that promote strong organizational commitment, the evidence suggests this incentive is weaker than imagined. This paper shows that cooperatives that believe they have a well-defined and loyal membership are less likely to hire leaders that will enhance member commitment. Thus, historical success is no guarantee of future success and may in fact contain the seeds of failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B., and B. Henehan. 2002. “What Went Wrong at Agway?” Extension Paper, Cornell University Cooperative Enterprise Program, Cornell University. Located January 18, 2005 at http://cooperatives.aem.cornell.edu/pdf/resources/agway.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R.A., and C.K. Prahalad. 1995. “The Dominant Logic: Rretrospective and Extension.” Strategic Management Journal 16:5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud, B., and J. Tirole. 2002. “Parties as Political Intermediaries.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117:1453–89.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M.L. 1994. “The Role of Management Behavior in Agricultural Cooperatives.” Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 9:42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M.L. 1995. “The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-institutional Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77:1153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewins, A. 2002. “Special Report: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool.” Western Producer May 9: 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, B. 2003. “Losing Sight of the Goal: Agway.” Paper prepared for the CARD II Leadership Development Forums, Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, A. M., and Al-Kheraiji, A.A. 1995. “Debt and Input Misallocation of Agricultural Supply and Marketing Cooperatives.” Applied Economics 27:871–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M.E., and K. Giannakas. 2001. “Organizational Commitment in a Mixed Oligopoly: Agricultural Cooperatives and Investor-owned Firms.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M.E. 1999. “Cooperatives and Member Commitment.” Finnish Journal of Business Economics 4:418–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M.E. 1989. “Co-operatives in Oligopolistic Industries: the Western Canadian Fertilizer Industry.” Journal of Agricultural Cooperation 4:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, E. 2002. “Factors Underlying the Evolution of Farm-related Cooperatives in Alberta.” Principal Paper, Canadian Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Calgary AB, May 30–June 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, J.J. 2004. “Lessons in Cooperative Failure: The Rice growers’ Association experience.” Working paper. Presented at the NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives Annual Meeting, Kansas City, November 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K., and M.E. Fulton. 2004. “Member commitment and the market and financial performance of the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool.” Current Agriculture Food and Resource Issues 5:238–252. Located at www.cafri.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economic Theory 18:301–17.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., and R.A. Bettis. 1986. “The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 7:485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R.J. 1990. “Imperfect Competition in Agricultural Markets and the Role of cooperatives: A Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:709–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R.J. and H. Hariyoga. 2004. “The Canning of Tri-Valley.” Rural Cooperatives (September/October): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, R. 2003. “Farmland Industries Limited.” Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association and the Rural Sociological Society, Montreal, PQ, July 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulton, M., Giannakas, K. (2007). Agency and Leadership in Cooperatives. In: Vertical Markets and Cooperative Hierarchies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5543-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics