Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources ((ENGO,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberini, A., 1995, “Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-bound, Double-bound and Bivariate Models,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 187-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberini, A., M. Cropper, T.-T. Fu, A. Krupnick, J.-T. Liu, D. Shaw and W. Harrington, 1997a, “Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Taiwan,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 107-26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alberini, A., B. Kanninen and R.T. Carson, 1997b, “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data,” Land Economics,73(3), 309-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberini, A., P. Riganti and A. Longo, 2004, “Public Preferences and Urban Regeneration: Land Use Changes and Aesthetics at the Venice Arsenale,” draft report to Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Venice, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T.A., 1988, “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(3), 355-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T.A., 1991, “Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys,” Land Economics, 67(4), 413-21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T.A. and M.D. James, 1987, “Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys,” Review of Economics and Statistics,69(2), 269-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R.T., 1991, “Constructed Markets,” in John Braden and Charles Kolstad, eds., Measuring the Demand for Environmental Commodities, Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R.T., R.C. Mitchell, M.W. Hanemann, R.J. Kopp, S. Presser and P.A. Ruud, 1994, “Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez,” Resources for the Future Discussion paper QE94-18, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.C., 1993, “Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 25-40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.C., 1994, “A Comparison of Approaches to Calculating Confidence Intervals for Benefit Measures from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys,” Land Economics, 70(1), 111-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.C., 2002, “Flexible-form and Semi-nonparametric Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Dichotomous Choice Data,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 267-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.C., W.M. Hanemann and G. Signorello, 2002, “One and One-Half Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 742-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShazo, J.R., 2002, “Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question Formats,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 360-85.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H., 2003, Econometric Analysis, 4th edition, Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefele, M.A. and J.B. Loomis, 2001, “Improving Statistical Efficiency and Testing Robustness of Conjoint Marginal Valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5,) 1321-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt, J.K. and J.D. Graham, 1999, “Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probabilities?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18(1), 33-62.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M., 1984, “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 332-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M., 1991, “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?” American Economic Review, 81(3), 635-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M., J. Loomis and B.J. Kanninen, 1991, “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4), 1255-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., S. Mourato and R.E. Wright, 2001, “Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation?” Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. and D. McFadden, 1984, “A Specification Test for the Multinomial Logit Model,” Econometrica, 52, 1219-240.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herriges, J.A. and J.F. Shogren, 1996, “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-up Questioning,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 112-31.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn, J.P and A. Randall, 1987, “A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 226-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M., Per-Olov Johansson and Karl-Gustav Löfgren, 1997, “On the Value of Changes in Life Expectancy: Blips Versus Parametric Changes,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15, 221-39.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen, B.J., 1993, “Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” Land Economics, 69, 138-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky, I. and A. Robb, 1986, “Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 715-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magat, W.A. and W.K. Viscusi, 1992, Informational Approaches to Regulation, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, K.E., 1990, “Models for Referendum Data,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 19-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.L., 1974, “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Analysis,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press, 105-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson, 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K.E., 1999, “Mixed Logit Models for Recreation Demand,” Chapter 4 in Joseph A. Herriges and Catherine L. Kling, eds., Valuing Recreation and the Environment. Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K.E., 2003, Discrete Choice Models with Simulations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J., 2002, Econometrics Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alberini, A., Longo, A., Veronesi, M. (2006). Basic Statistical Models For Stated Choice Studies. In: Kanninen, B.J. (eds) Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5313-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics