Skip to main content

Computing Codes Versus Interpreting Life

Two alternative ways of synthesizing biological knowledge through semiotics

  • Chapter
Introduction to Biosemiotics

Abstract

One of the most important aims of biosemiotics is to provide a conceptual framework for synthesizing the biological knowledge of living systems. This goal can be assumed achievable in (at least) two alternative ways, both of which are actually followed by working biosemioticians. Either biosemiotics is considered a philosophical revolution in biological thought that will change biology into an art of interpreting life, i.e. into an appreciation of organisms as semiotic beings whose structure, function, and behaviour is to be understood by participating in the communicative web of life. Or biosemiotics is considered from a model-theoretical point of view as an application of abstract semiotic concepts to a field of empirical research that is foreign to semiotics only for an anthropocentric understanding of signs. This paper sketches both biosemiotic ways of synthesizing biological knowledge and shows how they mirror a fundamental opposition, which has been intensely investigated by Jaakko Hintikka, between two answers to the question whether it is possible that language can be scientifically explained by linguistic means. It is argued that biosemiotics should postulate, as a starting-point of its research programme, a positive answer to this question. A model-theoretical sketch of how to develop a precise definition of organic codes, shall show that this postulate allows to elucidate the inner structure of biosemiotic concepts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, Svend (1989). Sprog og skabelse: Fænomenologisk sprogopfattelse i lyset af analytisk filosofi, med henblik pÃ¥ det religiøse sprog. Copenhagen: Gyldendal

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, Karl Otto; et al. (2000). Un siécle de philosophie 1900–2000. Paris: Gallimard/Centre Pompidou

    Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan (2002). Three types of semiotic indeterminacy in Monod’s philosophy of modern biology. In: Sign Systems Studies30(1), 149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan (2003). Artificial Life as a structural science. In: Philosophia naturalis40(2), 183–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan (2004). Four principles of evolutionary pragmatics in Jacob’s philosophy of modern biology. In: Axiomathes14(4), 381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artmann, Stefan (2005). Biosemiotics as a structural science: Between the forms of life and the life of forms. In: Journal of Biosemiotics1(1), 183–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, Wolfgang; Dawe, Chris M. (1997). Models for Genetics. Frankfurt am Main: Lang

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello (2002). Has biosemiotics come of age? In: Semiotica139, 283–295. Reprinted with a new postscript in this volume

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello (2003). The Organic Codes: An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John (1995). The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Gereon Wolters and James G. Lennox (eds.): Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 45–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans (1986). Die Lesbarkeit der Welt. Paperback edition (Original edition 1981). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels (1933). Light and life. In: Nature131: 421–423 and 457–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels (1963). Light and life revisited. In: ICSU Review of World Science5: 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Botstein, David; Cherry, J. Michael (1997). Molecular linguistics: Extracting information from gene and protein sequences. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences94, 5506–5507

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto (1995). The Quest for a Perfect Language. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, Manfred (1979). Sprache und Lernen auf molekularer Ebene. In: Armin Mohler (ed.): Der Mensch und seine Sprache. Berlin: Propyläen, 181–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus (1994). The Garden in the Machine: The Emergent Science of Artificial Life. Translated by Steven Sampson. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus (1997). Biologi og semiotik: Den biosemiotiske tanke. In: Keld Gall Jørgensen (ed.): Anvendt semiotik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 62–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus (1998). Defining life as a semiotic phenomenon. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing 5(1), 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus (1999). The Sarkar challenge to biosemiotics: Is there any information in a cell? In: Semiotica127(1–4), 273–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi; Stjernfelt, Frederik (2002). Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. Tartu: Tartu University Press (Tartu Semiotics Library Vol. 3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Pascal (2000). L’espace des raisons est-il sans limites?In: Apel et al. (2000), 231–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald A. (1999). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Edited by J.H. Bennett (Original edition 1930). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, David B. (ed.) (1998). Evolutionary Computing: The Fossil Record. New York: IEEE Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Steven A. (1995). George Price’s contributions to evolutionary genetics. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology175, 373–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2000a). On the theoretical role of ‘genetic coding’. In: Philosophy of Science67, 26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2000b). Information, arbitrariness, and selection: Comments on Maynard Smith. In: Philosophy of Science67, 202–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2000). Philosophie hérmeneutique et philosophie analytique: Deux variantes complémentaires du tournant linguistique. In: Apel et al. (2000), 177–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamming, Richard W. (1950). Error detecting and error correcting codes. In: The Bell System Technical Journal26(2), 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Marc D.; Chomsky, Noam; Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? In: Science298, 1569-1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko (1997). Selected Papers.Vol. 2: Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko (1998). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Paperback edition (Original edition 1996). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, Wilfrid (1993). Model Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications Vol. 42)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Translated by Barbara J. Haveland. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1998). Semiosis and biohistory: A reply. In: Semiotica120(3/4), 455–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2000). Code-duality and the epistemic cut. In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences901, 175–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2001). Life and reference. In: BioSystems60, 123–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Randall A.; Ellington, Andrew D. (2005). Mistakes in translation don’t translate into termination. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102(5), 1273–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, François (2000). Le jeu des possibles: Essais sur la diversité du vivant. Paperback edition (Original edition 1981). Paris: Le livre de poche

    Google Scholar 

  • Küppers, Bernd-Olaf (1990). Information and the Origin of Life. Cambrige/MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi (2005). A brief history of biosemiotics. In: Journal of Biosemiotics1(1), 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin (1989). Language as Calculus vs. Language as Universal medium: A Study in Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer (Synthese Library Vol. 207)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Christopher G. (1989). Artificial Life. In: C.G. Langton (ed.): Artificial Life: Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems Held September 1987 in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Redwood City/CA: Addison-Wesley (Sante Fe Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings Vol. 6), 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Arnon; Jablonka, Eva (2004). Review of Barbieri (2003). In: Acta Biotheoretica52, 65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, Aristid (1964). Life cycles as hierarchical relations. In: John R. Gregg and Francis T. C. Harris (eds.): Form and Strategy in Science: Studies Dedicated to Joseph Henry Woodger on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Dordrecht: Reidel, 416–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, Knud Ejler (1997). System og Symbol: Essays. Second edition. Edited by Viggo Mortensen et al. Copenhagen: Gyldendal

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, João Carlos Marques; Krause, Décio (2000). Suppes predicate for genetics and natural selection. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology209, 141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markos, Anton (2002). Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John; Szathmáry, Eörs (2000). The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Paperback edition (Original edition 1999). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, Jacques (1973). Le hasard et la nécessité: Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Paperback edition (Original edition 1970). Paris: Seuil

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirenberg, Marshall (2005). Deciphering the genetic code: A personal account. In: Jan A. Witkowski (ed.): The Inside Story: DNA to RNA to Protein. Cold Spring Harbor/NY: CSHL Press, 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Sean H. (2004). Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sunderland/MA: Sinauer

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, Steven (1996). Introduction to Coding and Information Theory. New York/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipper, Moshe (2002). Machine Nature: The Coming Age of Bio-Inspired Computing. New York et al.: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, Ulrich E. (2004). The arbitrariness of the genetic code. In: Biology and Philosophy19, 205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick (1999). Introduction to Logic. Reprint (Original edition 1957). Mineola/NY: Dover

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick (2002). Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. Stanford/CA: CSLI Publications (CSLI Lecture Notes Vol. 130)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Thomas M. (1983). From Error Correcting Codes through Sphere Packings to Simple Groups. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America (Carus Mathematical Monographs Vol. 21)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijenoort, Jean (1967). Logic as calculus and logic as language. In: Synthese17, 324–330. Reprinted in: Hintikka (1997), 233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Judy L. (2000). Codes and Curves. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society (Student Mathematical Library Vol. 7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, James D.; Baker, Tania A.; Bell, Stephen P.; Gann, Alexander; Levine, Michael; Losick, Richard (2004). Molecular Biology of the Gene. Fifth edition. San Francisco and Cold Spring Harbor: Cummings and CSHL Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Andreas (2003). Natur als Bedeutung: Versuch einer semiotischen Theorie des Lebendigen. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, George C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, George C. (1997). The Pony Fish’s Glow and Other Clues to Plan and Purpose in Nature. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, Joseph H. (1937). The Axiomatic Method in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, Joseph H. (1952). Biology and Language: An Introduction to the Methodology of the Biological Sciences Including Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Artmann, S. (2008). Computing Codes Versus Interpreting Life. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics