Abstract
In this essay, I examine the possible use of the distinction between discovery and justification for the analysis of research practice, and what we can learn, in turn, from this analysis for an assessment of the uses and limits of this distinction. First, I illustrate that nonstandard uses of experiments and processes of concept formation reveal the “process-interpretation” of the DJ distinction as inappropriate. Turning to what is often regarded as the core of the DJ distinction—the differentiation between genesis and validity—I shall focus on the role it plays within science. Moreover, by taking processes of concept formation seriously, new and hitherto unrecognized limits of justification become visible. In particular, justification turns out to be more genuinely bound to history than is usually assumed. To illustrate and flesh out my general claims, I shall first provide an analysis of a specific historical episode: the purported “discovery” of the two electricities in the 1730s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Bose, Georg Matthias (1744), Tentamina electrica in academiis regiis Londinensi et Parisana primum habita, omni studio repetita (Wittenberg: Johann Ahlfeld).
Doppelmayr, Johann Gabriel (1744), Neu-entdeckte Phaenomena von bewunderungswürdigen ürkungen der Natur (Nürnberg).
Dufay, Charles François de Cisternai (1733), “Quatrième mémoire sur l ' électricité. De l ' attraction et répulsion des corps électriques”, Histoire de I ' Académie Royale des Sciences, avec les Mémoires de Mathématique & de Physique pour la m ême année: pp. 457–477.
Dufay, Charles Fran,cois de Cisternai (1734), “A Letter from Mons. Du Fay, F. R. S. and of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Paris, to His Grace Charles Duke of Richmond and Lenox, concerning Electricity. Translated from the French by T. S.MD.”, Philosophical Transactions 38(431): 258–266.
Fleck, Ludwik (1935 [1980]), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).
Fleck, Ludwik (1979), Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Frercks, Jan (2004), “Disziplinenbildung und Vorlesungsalltag. Funktionen von Lehrbüchern der Physik um 1800 mit einem Fokus auf die Universität Jena”, Berichte zurWissenschaftsgeschichte 27:27–52.
Gralath, Daniel (1747), “Geschichte derElectricität”, Versuche undAbhandlungen derNaturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Danzig 1: 175–304.
Gurova, Lilia (2003), “Philosophy of science meets cognitive science: The categorization debate”, in D. Ginev (ed.), Bulgarian Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 236 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 141–162.
Hacking, Ian (2002), Historical Ontology (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Heilbron, John L. (1979), Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Jacob, François (1997), La souris, la mouche et l ' homme (Paris: Odile Jacob).
Klein, Ursula (1994), “Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound.”, Science in Context 7(2): 163–204.
Mach, Ernst (1883), DieMechanik in ihrerEntwickelung: historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Internationale wissenschaftliche Bibliothek 59 (Leipzig: Brockhaus).
Mach, Ernst (1960), The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development. 6th edn., with revisions through the 9. german ed. Transl. Thomas J. MacCormack, introd. Karl Menger (LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publ.).
Musschenbroek, Petrus van and Gottscheden, Johann Christoph (1747), Hrn. Peters von Muschenbroek Grundlehren der Naturwissenschaft, nach der 2. lat. Ausg., nebst einigen neuen Zusätzen des Ver-fassers, ins Deutsche übers. Mit einer Vorrede ans Licht gestellt von Johann Christoph Gottscheden (Leipzig: Kiesewetter).
Musschenbroek, Pieter van (1739), Essai de physique-Beginsels der natuurkunde (Leyden: Luchtmans).
Prinz, Jesse J. (2002), Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Representation and Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Reichenbach, Hans (1938), Experience and Prediction: An Analysis ofthe Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Shapere, Dudley (1980), “The character of scientific change”, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 56 (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 61–101.
Smith, Edward E. and Medin, Douglas L. (1981), Categories and Concepts. Cognitive Science Series Vol. 4 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Steinle, Friedrich (1997), “Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Supplement): S65–S74.
Steinle, Friedrich (2003), “Experiments in History and Philosophy of Science”, Perspectives on Science 10(4): 408–132.
Steinle, Friedrich (2005), Explorative Experimente. Ampere, Faraday und die Ursprünge der Elektro-dynamik. Boethius 50 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag).
Whewell, William (1840), The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History (London: Parker).
Williams, Michael (1996), Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Winkler, Johann Heinrich (1745), Die Eigenschaften der electrischen Materie und des electrischen Feuers, aus verschiedenen neuen Versuchen erkläret, und, nebst etlichen neuen Maschinen zum Electrisiren beschrieben (Leipzig: Breitkopf).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
STEINLE, F. (2006). CONCEPT FORMATION AND THE LIMITS OF JUSTIFICATION: “DISCOVERING” THE TWO ELECTRICITIES. In: SCHICKORE, J., STEINLE, F. (eds) Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Archimedes, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4250-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4251-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)