Skip to main content

Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents

  • Chapter
Advances in Natural Multimodal Dialogue Systems

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 30))

Abstract

The functions of social dialogue between people in the context of performing a task is discussed, as well as approaches to modelling such dialogue in embodied conversational agents. A study of an agent’s use of social dialogue is presented, comparing embodied interactions with similar interactions conducted over the phone, assessing the impact these media have on a wide range of behavioural, task and subjective measures. Results indicate that subjects’ perceptions of the agent are sensitive to both interaction style (social vs. task-only dialogue) and medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman, I. and Taylor, D. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinhart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. and Guerrero, L. (1998). The Bright Side of Relational Communication: Interpersonal Warmth as a Social Emotion. In Andersen, P. and Guerrero, L., editors, Handbook of Communication and Emotion, pages 303–329. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, E., Muller, J., and Rist, T. (1996). The PPP Persona: A Multipurpose Animated Presentation Agent. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 245–247, Gubbio, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, E., Rist, T., and Muller, J. (1998). Integrating Reactive and Scripted Behaviors in a Life-Like Presentation Agent. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 261–268, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily Communication. New York: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1990). The Biological Basis of Rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1:297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beskow, J. and McGlashan, S. (1997). Olga: A Conversational Agent with Gestures. In André, E., editor, Proceedings of the IJCAI 1997 Workshop on Animated Interface Agents: Making Them Intelligent, Nagoya, Japan. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore, T. (2002). When Etiquette Really Matters: Relational Agents and Behavior Change. In Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on Etiquette for Human-Computer Work, pages 9–10, Falmouth, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore, T. and Cassell, J. (2001). Relational Agents: A Model and Implementation of Building User Trust. In Proceedings of CHI 2001, pages 396–403, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, N., Olson, J. S., Gergle, D., Olson, G. M., and Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of Four Computer-Mediated Communications Channels on Trust Development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 135–140, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E., Anderson, A., and Newlands, A. (1994). The Effects of Visibility in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task. Language and Speech, 37(1):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In Goody, E., editor, Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, pages 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1972). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Giglioli, P., editor, Language and Social Context, pages 252–282. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies. Language in Society, 18:159–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. and Bickmore, T. (2003). Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents. User Modeling and Adaptive Interfaces, 13(1–2):89–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjálmsson, H., and Yan, H. (1999). Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 520–527, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Campbell, L., Vilhjálmsson, H., and Yan, H. (2000a). Human Conversation as a System Framework: Designing Embodied Conversational Agents. In Embodied Conversational Agents, pages 29–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., H, Vilhjálmsson, and Yan, H. (2000b). More Than Just a Pretty Face: Affordances of Embodiment. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 52–59, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., and Churchill, E. (2000c). Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheepen, C. (1988). The Predictability of Informal Conversation. New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chovil, N. (1991). Discourse-Oriented Facial Displays in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25(1991/1992):163–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, J., Coupland, N., and Robinson, J. D. (1992). How Are You? Negotiating Phatic Communion. Language in Society, 21:207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A. F., and Watts, L. A. (1998). Some Advantages of Video Conferencing over High-Quality Audio Conferencing: Fluency and Awareness of Attentional Focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(1):21–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, D. M. and van Mulken, S. (2000). The Impact of Animated Interface Agents: A Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. (1974). On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns. Language in Society, 3:161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garros, D. (1999). Real Estate Agent, Home and Hearth Realty. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, I. (1967). On Face-Work. In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, pages 5–46. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J., Lindberg, N., and Lundeberg, M. (1999). The August Spoken Dialogue System. In Proceedings of the Eurospeech 1999 Conference, pages 1151–1154, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann, A. G. and Rudnicky, A. I. (1988). Talking to Computers: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 8(6):583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1960). Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In Sebeok, T., editor, Style in Language, pages 351–377. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1980). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters, volume 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. (1997). Social Human-Computer Interaction. In Friedman, B., editor, Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, pages 191–199. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, T. and Maes, P. (1996). Agents with Faces: The Effect of Personification. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN 1996), pages 189–194, Tsukuba, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1975). Communicative Functions of Phatic Communion. In Kendon, A., Harris, R., and Key, M., editors, The Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, pages 215–238. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1981). Linguistic Routines and Politeness in Greeting and Parting. In Coulmas, F., editor, Conversational Routine, pages 289–304. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J., Stone, B., and Stelling, G. (1999). Lifelike Pedagogical Agents for Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving in Constuctivist Learning Environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 9(1–2):1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1989). How to Do the Right Thing. Connection Science Journal, 1(3):291–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1923). The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., editors, The Meaning of Meaning, pages 296–346. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y. and Nass, C. I. (1996). How “Real” are Computer Personalities? Psychological Responses to Personality Types in Human-Computer Interaction. Communication Research, 23(6):651–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C. and Gong, L. (2000). Speech Interfaces from an Evolutionary Perspective. Communications of the ACM, 43(9):36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onkvisit, S. and Shaw, J. J. (1994). Consumer Behavior: Strategy and Analysis. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, S. (1995). Predicting Spoken Disfluencies during Human-Computer Interaction. Computer Speech and Language, 9:19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, S. and Adams, B. (2000). Designing and Evaluating Conversational Interfaces with Animated Characters. In Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., and Churchill, E., editors, Embodied Conversational Agents, pages 319–345. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, S. L. (1998). User-Centered Modeling for Spoken Language and Multimodal Interfaces. In Maybury, M. T. and Wahlster, W., editors, Readings in Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 620–630. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. and Wegener, D. (1998). Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., and Lindzey, G., editors, The Handbook of Social Psychology, pages 323–390. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1989). Making Sales: Influence as Interpersonal Accomplishment. Mewbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. V. and Lammers, H. B. (1985). The Influence of Self-Esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like versus Human-Like Computer Feedback. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(6):761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. and McCroskey, J. (1995). Immediacy-Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickel, J. and Johnson, W. L. (1998). Task-Oriented Dialogs with Animated Agents in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Embodied Conversational Characters, pages 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickenberg, R. and Reeves, B. (2000). The Effects of Animated Characters on Anxiety, Task Performance, and Evaluations of User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 49–56, The Hague, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, D. R. (1987). Communicating by Telephone. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. P. (1988). Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidner, C. and Dzikovska, M. (2005). A First Experiment in Engagement for Human-Robot Interaction in Hosting Activities. In van Kuppevelt, J., Dybkjær, L., and Bernsen, N. O., editors, Advances in Natural Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Springer. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., and Waters, K. (1997). When the Interface is a Face. In Friedman, B., editor, Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, pages 163–190. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. and Doran, C. (1997). Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree-Adjoining Grammar. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL/EACL 1997), pages 198–205, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svennevig, J. (1999). Getting Acquainted in Conversation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, A. and Naito, T. (1995). Situated Facial Displays: Towards Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 450–455, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Mulken, S., André, E., and Muller, J. (1999). An Empirical Study on the Trustworthiness of Lifelike Interface Agents. In Bullinger, H.-J. and Ziegler, J., editors, Human-Computer Interaction (Proceedings of HCI-International 1999), pages 152–156. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeless, L. and Grotz, J. (1977). The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3):250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. and O’Conaill, B. (1993). An Evaluation of Video Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of Human Factors and Computing Systems (INTERACT/CHI 1993), pages 73–74, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. and O’Conaill, B. (1997). The Role of Vision in Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication. In Finn, K., Sellen, A., and Wilbur, S., editors, Video-Mediated Communication, pages 23–49. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. (1979). A Psychological Taxonomy of Trait-Descriptive Terms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3):395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. (1977). Introversion/Extraversion. In Blass, T., editor, Personality Variables in Social Behavior, pages 179–218. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J., Veinott, E. S., Bos, N., Olson, J. S., and Olson, G. M. (2002). Trust without Touch: Jumpstarting Long-Distance Trust with Initial Social Activities. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Human-Computer Interaction (CHI), pages 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bickmore, T., Cassell, J. (2005). Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents. In: van Kuppevelt, J.C.J., Dybkjær, L., Bernsen, N.O. (eds) Advances in Natural Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics