This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Binmore, Ken and Alex Voorhoeve, 2003, “Defending Transitivity against Zeno’s Paradox”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 31, pp. 272–279 [* pp. 265–71 of this volume].
Carlson, Erik, 2003, “On Some Recent Examples of Intransitive Betterness”, in K. Segerberg and R. Sliwinski (eds.), Logic, Law, Morality (Uppsala: Dept. of Philosophy), pp. 181–195.
Harrod, R. F., 1936, “Utilitarianism Revised”, Mind 45, pp. 137–156.
Rachels, Stuart, 1998, “Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Better Than”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76, pp. 71–83 [* pp. 249–63 of this volume].
Rachels, Stuart, 2001, “A Set of Solutions to Parfit’s Problems”, Noûs 35, pp. 214–238.
Temkin, Larry S., 1987, “Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 16, pp. 138–187.
Temkin, Larry S., 1996, “A Continuum Argument for Intransitivity”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 25, pp. 175–210.
Temkin, Larry S. 1997, “Rethinking the Good, Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning”, in Jonathan Dancy (ed.), Reading Parfit (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 290–345.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carlson, E. (2005). Intransitivity Without Zeno’s Paradox. In: Rønnow-Rasmussen, T., Zimmerman, M.J. (eds) Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3846-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3846-1_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3845-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3846-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)