6. Conclusions
Viewing Michael’s learning in the context of the previously cited literature in which others have explored metaphors in professional learning extends our interest in the spontaneous and non-deliberate features of metaphors and in the value of documenting and analysing their significance. Tom did not teach Michael to use metaphors, nor did Michael attempt to create them. Realising that metaphors were appearing in his writing and then attending carefully to that insight encouraged and enriched Michael’s awareness of his professional learning. Michael’s willingness to pursue the conversation about metaphors after his practicum extended considerably his awareness of the changes occurring in his professional knowledge and in his understanding of how such knowledge develops. This account of Michael’s professional learning illustrates the potential value of assisting new teachers in identifying and interpreting changes in their perceptions of themselves and of those they teach. It also illustrates the power of bringing careful and deliberate attention to bear on spontaneous and non-deliberate features of learning from experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
8. References
Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–139.
Cook-Sather, A. (2001). Between student and teacher: Learning to teach as translation. Teaching Education, 12, 177–190.
Hoban, G. (2000). Using a reflective framework to study teaching-learning relationships. Reflective Practice, 1, 165–182.
Hunt, C. (2001). Shifting shadows: Metaphors and maps for facilitating reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 2, 275–287.
Iran-Nejad, A. (1990). Active and dynamic regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research, 60, 573–602.
Kessels, J. P. A. M., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 17–22.
Martinez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965–977.
Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role of dynamic sources. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 157–173.
Perry, C., & Cooper, M. (2001). Metaphors are good mirrors: Reflecting on change for teacher educators. Reflective Practice, 2, 41–52.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, T., Hrycenko, M. (2006). The Role of Metaphor in a New Science Teacher’s Learning from Experience. In: Aubusson, P.J., Harrison, A.G., Ritchie, S.M. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3829-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3830-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)