Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bain, Alexander (1882). John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Ball, Terrance (2000). ‘The Formation of Character: Mill’s “Ethology” Reconsidered.’ Polity XXXIII(Fall), 25–48.
Bentham, Jeremy (1948). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner.
Berger, Fred (1984). Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brandt, Richart (1959). Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Brandt, Richard (1988). ‘Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics.’ Ethics, 357–360.
Brown, D.G. (1974). ‘Mill’s Act Utilitarianism.’ Philosophical Quarterly 24, 67–68.
Carlisle, Janet (1991). John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Carlson, Erik (1990). ‘The Oughts and Cans of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 11, 91–96.
Crisp, Roger (1997). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London: Routledge.
Eisenbach, Eldon J. (Ed.) (1999). Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Gaus, Gerald F. (1980). ‘Mill’s Theory of Moral Rules.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58, 265–279.
Gray, John (1983). Mill on Liberty: A Defence, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. 28–42.
Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Howard-Snyder, Frances (1997). ‘The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 9, 241–248.
Howard-Snyder, Frances (1999). ‘Response to Carlson and Qizilbash.’ Utilitas 11, 106–111.
Lenman, James (2000). ‘Consequentialism and Cluelessness.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, 342–370.
Lyons, David (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon.
Lyons, David (1994). ‘Mill’s Theory of Morality.’ In: D. Lyons (Ed.), Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in Noûs 10 (1976), 101–120).
Mabbott, J.D. (1956). ‘Interpretations of Mill’s “Utilitarianism”.’ Philosophical Quarterly 6, 115–120.
Mill, John Stuart (1832). ‘Austin’s Lectures on Jurisprudence.’ In: John M. Robson (ed.), Essays on Equality, Laws, and Education, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XXI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984.
Mill, John Stuart (1833). ‘Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.
Mill, John Stuart (1838). ‘Bentham.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.
Mill, John Stuart (1859a). ‘Letter to Alexander Bain (14 Nov.),’ In: Francis Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley (Eds.), The Later Letters: 1849 to 1873, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. XIV–XVII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972.
Mill, John Stuart (1859b). On Liberty. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. XVIII–XIX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.
Mill, John Stuart (1861a). Utilitarianism. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.
Mill, John Stuart (1861b). Considerations on Representative Government. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. XVIII–XIX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.
Mill, John Stuart (1872). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. VII–VIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.
Mill, John Stuart (1874). ‘Nature.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.
Miller, Dale E. (1998). ‘Internal Sanctions in Mill’s Moral Psychology.’ Utilitas 10 (1998), pp. 68–81.
Miller, Dale E. (2003). ‘Actual-Consequence Act Utilitarianism and the Best Possible Humans.’ Ratio XVI, 49–62.
Morales, Maria H. (1996). Perfect Equality: John Stuart Mill on Well-Constituted Communities. Lanham MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
Qizilbash, Mozaffar (1999). ‘The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 11, 97–106.
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (2001). ‘Mill’s “Proof” of the Principle of Utility: A More Than Half-Hearted Defense.’ Social Philosophy and Policy 18, 330–60.
Shaw, W. (1999). Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.
Sidgwick, Henry (1981). The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Singer, Marcus (1977). ‘Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.’ Mind 86, 67–77.
Singer, Marcus (1983). ‘Further on Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.’ Mind 92, 270–274.
Skorupski, John (1989). John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.
Smart, J.J.C. (1973). ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.’ In: J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Temkin, Jack (1978). ‘Actual Consequence Utilitarianism: A Reply to Professor Singer.’ Mind 87, 412–414.
Urmson, J.O. (1953). ‘The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill.’ Philosophical Quarterly 3, 33–39.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, D.E. (2005). Moral Expertise: A Millian Perspective. In: Rasmussen, L. (eds) Ethics Expertise. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 87. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3820-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3820-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3819-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3820-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)