Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy

  • Chapter
The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century

Part of the book series: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 19))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anstey, P. R. (2002) ‘Locke, Bacon and natural history’, Early Science and Medicine, 7(1), pp. 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • — ed. (2003a) The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003b) ‘Locke on method in natural philosophy’ in The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, ed. P. R. Anstey, London: Routledge, pp. 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘The methodological origins of Newton’s queries’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, pp. 247–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F. (1859) The Works of Francis Bacon, 7 vols, eds J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis and D. D. Heath, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996) The Oxford Francis Bacon: Philosophical Studies c. 1611–c.1619, ed. G. Rees, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillet, A. (1691) De la vie de Monsieur Descartes, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barin, T. (1686) Le Monde Naissant, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechler, Z. (1974) ‘Newton’s 1672 optical controversies: a study in the grammar of scientific dissent’ in The Interaction between Science and Philosophy, ed. Y. Elkana, New Jersey: Humanities Press, pp. 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. Cooper, M., Hunter, M. and Jardine, L. eds (2003) London’s Leonardo: The Life and Work of Robert Hooke, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, T. (1756–1757) The History of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, R. (1697) King Arthur, 2nd edn, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, H. J. M., Rudwick, M. J. S., Snelders, H. A. M. and Visser, R. P. W., eds (1980) Studies on Christiaan Huygens, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. (1991) Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. M. A. Stewart, Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999–2000) The Works of Robert Boyle, 14 vols, eds M. Hunter and E. B. Davis, London: Pickering and Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) The Correspondence of Robert Boyle, 6 vols, eds M. Hunter, A. Clericuzio and L. M. Principe, London: Pickering and Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, J. Z. and Cohen, I. B., eds (2001) Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, T. (1681) Telluris theoria sacra, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, M. (1666) Observations upon experimental philosophy, London. Reprinted in 2001, ed. E. O’Neill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childrey, J. (1661) Britannia Baconia, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M. (1989) Occult Powers and Hypotheses, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. B. (1966) ‘Hypotheses in Newton’s Philosophy’, Physis, 8, pp. 163–184.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. B. and Smith G. E., eds (2002) The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. (1993) ‘The cutting edge of a revolution? Medicine and natural history near the shores of the North Sea’ in Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, eds J. V. Field and F. A. J. L. James, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightenment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998) ‘Probability and evidence’ in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, eds D. Garber and M. Ayers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1108–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, P. (1998) ‘Method and the study of nature’ in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 2 vols, eds D. Garber and M. Ayers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1, pp. 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, K. (1966) Dr. Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689): his Life and Original Writings, London: Wellcome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, B. J. T. (1991) The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, J. (1692) The Young-Students-Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkana, Y. ed. (1974) The Interaction between Science and Philosophy, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, M. (1988) ‘Partnership in glory: Newton and Locke through the Enlightenment and beyond’ in Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, eds P. B. Scheurer and G. Debrock, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) ‘Mathematicians and naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society’ in Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy, eds J. Z. Buchwald and I. B. Cohen, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, pp. 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, P. (1997) ‘Francis Bacon and the reform of natural history in the seventeenth century’ in History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. D. R. Kelley, New York, University of Rochester Press, pp. 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontenelle, B. Le B. (1686) Entretiens sur la pluralité de mondes, Paris and Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. (2001) The Science of Conjecture, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbey, A. (1982) ‘Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646–1671)’ in Problems of Cartesianism, eds T. M. Lennon, J. M. Nicholas and J. W. Davis, Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, pp. 171–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (1998) The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 2 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne, J. (1985) ‘The universities and the Scientific Revolution: the case of Newton and Restoration Cambridge’, History of Science, 23, pp. 391–434.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glanvill, J. (1665) Scepsis scientifica, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1668) Plus Ultra, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. (1987) ‘Ways to interpret the terms “Aristotelian” and “Aristotelianism” in Medieval and Renaissance natural philosophy’, History of Science, 25, pp. 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. R. (2002) ‘Pitfalls in the editing of Newton’s papers’, History of Science, 40, pp. 407–424.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. eds (1962) Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, R. (1661) An attempt for the Explication of the Phœnomena, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1665) Micrographia, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1705) The Posthumous works of Robert Hooke, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (1989) Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society, Woodbridge: Boydell.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995) Science and the Shape of Orthodoxy: Intellectual Change in Late Seventeenth-Century Britain, Woodbridge: Boydell.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003) ‘Robert Hooke: the natural philosopher’ in London’s Leonardo: The Life and Work of Robert Hooke, eds J. Bennett, M. Cooper, M. Hunter and L. Jardine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. and Wood, P. (1989) ‘Towards Solomon’s house: rival strategies for reforming the early Royal Society’ in Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society by M. Hunter, Woodbridge: Boydell, pp. 185–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, K. (1982) ‘What happened to occult qualities in the Scientific Revolution?’, Isis, 73, pp. 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1991) ‘Dormative virtues, scholastic qualities, and the new philosophies’, History of Science, 21, pp. 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, C. (1690) Traité de la lumière, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1888–1950) Oeuvres complètes de Christiaan Huygens, 22 vols, The Hague: Nijhoff..

    Google Scholar 

  • Keill, J. (1698) An Examination of Dr Burnet’s Theory of the Earth, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. R. ed. (1997) History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, New York: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. (1965) Newtonian Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1981) Science and Hypothesis, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M. and Davis, J. W., eds (1982) Problems of Cartesianism, Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M. (1983) ‘Natural history and the scientific revolution’, Clio, 13, pp. 519–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S., eds (1990) Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1823) The Works of John Locke, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1975) An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1976–) The Correspondence of John Locke, 9 vols, ed. E. S. de Beer, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989) Some Thoughts concerning Education, eds J. W. Yolton and J. S. Yolton, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. T. (2001) Solomon’s Child: Method in the Early Royal Society of London, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. E. (1970) ‘Atoms and the “analogy of nature”: Newton’s third rule of philosophizing’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1, pp. 3–58.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) ‘The fate of the date: the theology of Newton’s Principia revisited’ in Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, ed. M. J. Osler Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E. (1990) ‘Conceptions of science in the Scientific Revolution’ in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, eds D. C. Lindberg and R. S. Westman Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (1993) ‘The vitality and importance of early modern Aristotelianism’ in The Rise of Modern Philosophy, ed. T. Sorell, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messange M. de (1679) L’Ouvrage de La Creation. Traité Physique du Monde, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynell, G. G. ed. (1991) Thomas Sydenham’s Observationes Medicae and his Medical Observations, Folkestone: Winterdown Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, W. (1686) Sciothericum telescopicum; or A New Contrivance of Adapting a Telescope to an Horizontal Dial, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1692) Dioptrica nova, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedham, M. (1665) Medela medicinœ, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1715) ‘An account of the book entituled Commercium Epistolicum Collinii & aliorum, De Analysi Promota’, Philosophical Transactions, 342, pp. 173–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1959–1977) The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, 7 vols, eds H. W. Turnbull, J. F. Scott, A. R. Hall and L. Tilling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999) The Principia, eds I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, H. (1965–1986) The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols, eds A. R. Hall and M. B. Hall, Madison, Milwaukee and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, M. J. ed. (2000) Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1666) A free and impartial censure of the Platonick philosophie, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patey, D. L. (1984) Probability and Literary Form: Philosophic Theory and Literary Practice in the Augustan Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, W. (1647) The Advice of W. P. to Mr. Samuel Hartlib for The Advancement of some particular Parts of Learning, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, H. (1664) Experimental Philosophy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabra, A. I. (1967) Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton, London: Oldbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G., eds (1988) Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. B., Skinner, Q. and Kessler, E. (1988) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. A. (1986) ‘Cartesian method as mythic speech: a diachronic and structural analysis’ in The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies, eds J. A. Schuster and R. R. Yeo, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 33–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. A. and Yeo, R. R. eds (1986) The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. (1696) The Method to Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadwell, T. (1997) The Virtuoso, Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey: 1st edn London, 1676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. E. (2004) ‘Newton’s “experimental philosophy”’, Early Science and Medicine, 9(3), pp. 185–217.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. J. (1983) Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. (1669) Hydrologia chymica, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, G. (1683) Natural philosophy improven by new experiments, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. E. (2002) ‘The methodology of the Principia’ in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds I. B. Cohen. and G. E. Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T., ed. (1993) The Rise of Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprat, T. (1667) History of the Royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, G. (1658) Pyrotechny Asserted and Illustrated, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, R. and Addison, J., eds (1888) The Spectator, London: Routledge and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (2002) ‘Newton’s metaphysics’ in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds I. B. Cohen and G. E. Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydenham, T. (1683) Tractatus de podagra et hydrope, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1848) The Works of Thomas Sydenham M. D, trans. R. G. Latham, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toland, J. (1696) Christianity not mysterious, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. A. (1988) ‘Traditional Natural Philosophy’ in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, eds C. B. Schmitt, Q. Skinner and E. Kessler, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. (1969) ‘Henry More and Descartes: some new sources’, British Journal for the History of Science, 4, pp. 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, R. S. (1980) ‘Huygens and the problem of Cartesianism’ in Studies on Christiaan Huygens, eds H. J. M. Bos, Rudwick, M. J. S., Snelders, H. A. M and R. P. W. Visser, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B. V., pp. 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, T. (1659) Diatribae duae, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2002) ‘Newton and celestial mechanics’ in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds I. B. Cohen and G. E. Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. (1980) ‘Methodology and apologetics: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society’, British Journal for the History of Science, 13, pp. 1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wotton, W. (1694) Reflections Upon Ancient and Modern Learning, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney, Sydney

    Peter R. Anstey (Lecturer)

Authors
  1. Peter R. Anstey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Peter R. Anstey

  2. University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia

    John A. Schuster

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anstey, P.R. (2005). Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy. In: Anstey, P.R., Schuster, J.A. (eds) The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3703-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation