Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, A.E. (1992). “Faculty Cultures”. In: Clark, B.R. & Neave, G. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Vol. 3. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1614–1622.
Becher, T. (1987). “The disciplinary shaping of the profession”. In Clark, B.R. (ed.) The Academic Profession. National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1980). Process and structure in higher education. London: Heinemann (1st edition).
Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1992) Process and structure in higher education. London: Routledge (2nd edition).
Bleiklie, I. & Kogan, M. (2000). “Comparison and theories”. In: Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I. & Henkel, M. Transforming higher education. A comparative study. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Christensen, T. & Røvik, K.A. (1999). “The ambiguity of appropriateness”. In: Egeberg, M. & Lægreid, P. (eds.). Organizing Political Institutions. Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Clark, B.R. (1972). “The Organizational Saga in Higher Education”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,178–183.
Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W.W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Douglas, M. (ed.) (1982). In the active voice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Dunsire, A. (1995). “Administrative theory in the 1980s: A viewpoint”. Public Administration, 73(1),17–40.
Enders, J. (2004). “Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges for governance theory”. Higher Education, vol. 47(3), 361–382.
Fulton, O. (2003). “Managerialism in UK universities: Unstable hybridity and the complications of implementation”. InAmaral, A., Meek, V.L. & Larsen, I.M. (eds.). The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,155–178.
Gornitzka, Å. (2003). Science, clients and the state. A study of scientific knowledge production and use. Enschede: CHEPS/University of Twente.
Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C.R. (1996). “Understanding radical organisational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism”. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
Grendstad, G. & Selle, P. (1995). “Cultural theory and the new institutionalism”. Journal of theoretical politics, 7, 5–27.
Hall, P.A. & Taylor, R.C.R (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. MPIFG Discussion paper 96/6. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Hood, C. (1998). The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Keman, H. (1997). “Approaches to Analysis of Institutions”. In: Steunenberg, B. & van Vught, F. A. (eds.). Political Institutions and Public Policy. Perspectives on European Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kogan, M. (1988). Education accountability. An analytic overview. London: Hutchinson.
Kogan, M. (2002). National Characteristics and Policy Idiosyncrasies. In Enders, J. & Fulton, O. (eds.). Higher Education in a Globalising World. International Trends and Mutual Observations. A Festschrift in Honour of Ulrich Teichler. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Kogan, M. & Bauer, M. (2000). “Higher education policies. Historical overview”. In Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I. & Henkel, M. Transforming higher education. A comparative study. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Kogan, M. & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Kogan, M. & Henkel, M. (2000). “Future directions for higher education policy research”. In Schwarz, S. & Teichler, U. (eds.). The institutional basis of higher education research. Experiences and perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 25–44.
Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I. & Henkel, M. (2000). Transforming higher education. A comparative study. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Maassen, P. (1996). Governmental steering and the academic culture. The intangibility of the human factor in Dutch and German universities. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
Maassen, P. (2003). “Shifts in governance arrangements. An interpretation of new management structures in higher education”. In: Amaral, A., Meek, V.L. & Larsen, I.M. (eds.). The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 31–53.
Maassen, P. & Stensaker, B. (2003). “Interpretations of self-regulation: the changing state — higher education relationship in Europe”. In: Begg, R. (ed). The dialogue between higher education research and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Meek, V.L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O. & Rinne, R. (eds.) (1996). The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU press.
Oliver, C. (1992). “The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalisation”. Organizational Studies, 13(4), 563–588.
Peters, B.G. (2001). The Future of Governing. (2nd Edition, revised). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Reed, M.I. (2002). “New Managerialism, Professional Power and Organisational Governance”. In Amaral, A., G.A. Jones, & B. Karseth (eds.). Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 163–186.
Røvik, K.A. (1998). Moderne organisasjoner. Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusenårsskiftet. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage publications.
Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. (2nd edition) London: Sage publications.
Stensaker, B. (2004). The Transformation of organisational identities. Interpretations of policies concerning the quality of teaching and learning in Norwegian higher education. Enschede: CHEPS/University of Twente.
Teichler, U. (2000). “Higher education research and its institutional basis”. In Schwarz, S. & Teichler, U. (eds.). The institutional basis of higher education research. Experiences and perspectives. Dorndrecht: Kluwer academic publishers.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Trommel, W. & van der Veen, R. (1997). “Sociological perspectives on Institutions and Neo-institutionalism”. In Steunenberg, B. & van Vught, F. A. (eds.). Political Institutions and Public Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van Vught, F. A. (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Vroeijenstijn, T. (1995). Improvement and accountability. Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guidefor quality assessment in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Wildavsky, A. (1991). “What other theory would be expected to answer such profound questions? A reply to Per Selle’s critique of cultural theory”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 14,355–360.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maassen, P., Stensaker, B. (2005). The Black Box Revisited; the Relevance of Theory-Driven Research in the Field of Higher Education Studies. In: Bleiklie, I., Henkel, M. (eds) Governing Knowledge. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3504-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3504-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3489-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3504-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)