Skip to main content

Carbon Tax and International Emissions Trading: A Swiss Perspective

  • Chapter
The Coupling of Climate and Economic Dynamics

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 22))

Abstract

This paper assesses the economic impacts of the Swiss climate policy formulated under the Kyoto Protocol; the impacts on the carbon price, the welfare cost, and trade effects are examined. Our analysis is based on a multi-sectoral and multi-regional, computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the world economy (GEMINI-E3) which includes a representation of the Swiss economy. The model is used to evaluate the economic costs incurred in reaching the Swiss emission target through a CO2 tax, and/or by joining a EU-wide emission trading regime.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the NCCR-Climate. Helpful comments and suggestions have been provided by Martin Grosjean, Lukas Gutzwiller, Alain Haurie, Robert Krakowski, Maryse Labriet, and an anonymous referee. The views expressed herein, including any remaining errors, are solely the responsibility of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armington, P.S. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Papers, 16:159 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Criqui, P., Ellerman, D., Reilly, J., and Viguier, L. (2003). Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 8(3): 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Reilly, J., and Viguier, L. (2004). Is International Emission Trading Always Beneficial? The Energy Journal, 25(2):33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, O., Fragnère, E., and Kypreos, S. (1998). Swiss Energy Taxation Options to Curb CO2 Emissions. European Environment, 8(3):94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, O. and Frei, C. (2000). GEM-E3 Switzerland: A computable general equilibrium model applied for Switzerland. PSI Bericht 00–01, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Haurie, A., Vielle, M., and Viguier, L. (2002). A Two-level Dynamic Game of Carbon Emissions Trading Between Russia, China, and Annex B Countries. Working Paper 11, NCCR-WP4, Geneva, to appear in Journal of economic dynamics and control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.M., Vielle, M., and Viguier, L. (2003). Russia’s Role in the Kyoto Protocol. Report 98, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Vielle, M. (1998). La structure du modèle GEMINI-E3. Economie & Prévision, 5(136).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Vielle, M. (1999). Efficient Allocation of a Global Environment Cost Between Countries: Tradable Permits versus Taxes or Tradable Permits and Taxes? An Appraisal with a World General Equilibrium Model. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Vielle, M. (2001). Welfare Cost for Europe of Non-Participation to the Market of Tradable Permits and Comparative Efficiency of Corrective policies towards energy intensive sectors, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Vielle, M. (2002). Does Non Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by the US Increase the Likelihood of Monopolistic Behavior by Russia in the Market of Tradable Permits? Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Vielle, M. (2003). Measuring the Welfare Cost of Climate Change Policies: A Comparative Assessment Based on the Computable General Equilibrium Model GEMINI-E3. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 8(3):199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Energie (2001). Szenarien zu den Initiativen “Strom ohne Atom’’ sowie u MoratoriumPlus”. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2003). International Energy Outlook. EIA/DOE, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). Proposal for a Directive Amending the Directive Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms. Brussels. COM (2003)403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, M.C. and Munson, T.S. (2000). Complementarity Problems in GAMS and the PATH Solver. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24:165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, M.C. and Pang, J.S. (1997). Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T.W. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (1999). Energy Policy of IEA Countries: Switzerland 1999 Review. OECD/IEA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2002a). Energy Balances for non-OECD Countries. OECD/IEA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2002b). Energy Balances for OECD Countries. OECD/IEA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. D. and Ellerman, A. D. (2002). The Safety Valve and Climate Policy. report 83, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbaroglu, G. and Madiener, R. (2003). Energy and Climate Policy Analysis with the Hybrid Bottom-Up Computable General Equilibrium Model SCREEN: The Case of the Swiss CO2 Act. Annals of Operations Research. 121:181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W.J. and Wilcoxen, P.J. (1997). A Better Way to Slow Global Climate Change. Brookings Policy Brief 17, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J.R.N. (1983). Linear Expenditure Systems and Demand Analysis: An Application to the Pattern of British Demand. Economic Journal, 64:511–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2002). Third National Communication of Switzerland 2001. FCCC/IDR.3/CHE. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. L. (1992). Microeconomic Analysis. W.W. Norton & Company, New York & London, third edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viguier, L., Babiker, M., and Reilly, J. (2003). The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol in the European Union. Energy Policy, 31(5):459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J. P. (1999). The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation. The Energy Journal, Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernard, A., Vielle, M., Viguier, L. (2005). Carbon Tax and International Emissions Trading: A Swiss Perspective. In: Haurie, A., Viguier, L. (eds) The Coupling of Climate and Economic Dynamics. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3425-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics