Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1995). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. (1992, Spring). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, G. W., & Friel, S. N. (1998). Graphical representations: Helping students interpret data. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12 (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, G. W. (1992). Teaching statistics. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Heeding the call for change: Suggestions for curricular action (pp. 3–43). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 801–823.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cocking, R. R., & Mestre, J. P. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R., & Gregory, R. (2000). Preparing adult students to be better decision makers. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult Numeracy Development: Theory, Research, Practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossen, C. (1994). Tainted truth: The manipulation of fact in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, D., Schmitt, M. J., & Waldron, W. (1996). A Framework for adult numeracy standards: The mathematical skills and abilities adults need to be equipped for the future. Final report from the System Reform Planning Project of the Adult Numeracy Network. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Available online at http://www.std.com/anpn/

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. (1990). atThe interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A reexamination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1996). White paper on education and training: Teaching and learning—towards the learning society. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different “R”—radical mathematics. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, S. N., Russell, S., & Mokros, J. R. (1990). Used numbers: Statistics: middles, means, and in-betweens. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1994, September). Assessment of interpretive skills. Summary of working group, Conference on Assessment Issues in Statistics Education. Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1995). Statistical tools and statistical literacy: The case of the average. Teaching Statistics, 17(3), 97–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., & Baron, J. (1996). Understanding repeated simple choices. Thinking and Reasoning, 2(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1997). Numeracy: Reflections on imperatives of a forgotten goal. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Quantitative literacy (pp. 36–44). Washington, DC: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1998). Assessing statistical knowledge as it relates to students’ interpretation of data. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12 (pp. 275–295). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1999). Links between literacy and numeracy. In D. A. Wagner, R. L. Venezky, and B. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook (pp. 227–231). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2000). The numeracy challenge. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice (pp. 1–25). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., & Garfield, J. (Eds.). (1997). The assessment challenge in statistics education. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute/IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., Ginsburg, L., & Schau, C. (1997). Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 37–54). Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute/IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. B., & Gal, I. (1999). Assessment and statistics education: Current challenges and directions. International Statistical Review, 67(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. E. (1993, April). Affective, evaluative, and behavioral components of attitudes toward statistics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, R. (1983). How to tell the liars from the statisticians. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D. (1954). How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1996). Scientific literacy: A functional construct. In D. Baker, J. Clay, & C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing in English, maths, and science (pp. 43–51). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joram, E., Resnick, L., & Gabriele, A. J. (1995). Numeracy as a cultural practice: An examination of numbers in magazines for children, teenagers, and adults. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(4), 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, G. (1997). Understanding the news. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 23–29). New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I., & Mosenthal, P. (1990). Understanding the news. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(2), 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., & Mosenthal, P. B (1998). The measurement of adult Literacy. In S. T. Murray, I. S. Kirsch, & L. B. Jenkins (Eds.), Adult literacy in OECD countries: Technical report on the first International Adult Literacy Survey (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. E. (1989a). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosonen, P. & Winne, P. H. (1995). Effects of teaching statistical laws on reasoning about everyday problems. Journal of education psychology, 87(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (1990). Language and mathematics. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition (pp. 53–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P. (Ed.). (1998). Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, J. M., Swift, J., & Watkins, A. E. (1987). Exploring surveys and information from samples. (Quantitative literacy series). Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R. J. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, D. J. (1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1997a). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), pp. 123–165.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1997b). Statistics: Concepts and Controversies. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1253–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S., & Cobb, G. W. (2000). Statistics and mathematics: Tension and cooperation. American Mathematical Monthly, 107(7), 615–630

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mosenthal, P. B., & Kirsch, I. S. (1998). A new measure for assessing document complexity: The PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41(8), 638–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Boston: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt, J. D., & Turner, J. B. (1993). Shocking numbers and graphic accounts: Quantified images of drug problems in the print media. Social Problems, 40(2), 190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Human Resources Development Canada (1997). Literacy for the knowledge society: Further results from the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris and Ottawa: OECD and Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, A. (1997). Mathematical competencies that employers expect. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 137–154). New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira-Mendoza, L. (Ed.). (1993). Introducing data-analysis in the schools: Who should teach it and how? Voorburg, Holland: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J. F. (1997). Thinking quantitatively about science. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 69–74). New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. L., Watkins, A. E., & Landwehr, J. M. (1998). What every high-school graduate should know about statistics. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching and assessment in grades K-12 (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims (Vol. 1): A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws, (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J. B., Greer, B. (1997). Data handling. In A. Bishop (Ed.), International handbook on mathematics education (pp. 205–237). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkings, S. (1997). Assessing student projects. (1997). In I. Gal & J. Garfield, (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 139–151). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute and IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1996). Literacy, economy, and society: First results from the International Adult Literacy Survey. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S (2000). Equipped for the future content standards: What adults need to know and be able to do in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved January 1, 2001, from http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/collections/eff/eff_publications.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1990). Final Report on the World Conference on Education for All (Jomtien, Thailand). Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2000). World Education Report: The right to education—Towards education for all throughout life. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1991). Literacy: Developing the future. (International Yearbook of Education, vol. XLIII). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A., Venezky, R. L., & Street, B. V. (Eds.). (1999). Literacy: An International Handbook. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallman, K. K. (1993). Enhancing statistical literacy: Enriching our society. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, T. S., Fillenbaum, S., & Cox, J. A. (1986). Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanta, W. (1997). The public and the national agenda: How people learn about important issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy through the use of media surveys. In I. Gal & J. Garfield, (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute/IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000). Development of understanding of sampling for statistical literacy. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C., Triggs, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1997). Assessment on a budget: Using traditional methods imaginatively. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 205–220). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute/IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–256.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gal, I. (2004). Statistical Literacy. In: Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J. (eds) The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2277-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2278-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics