Skip to main content

Super-Resolution Land Cover Classification Using the Two-Point Histogram

  • Conference paper
geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 13))

Abstract

A geostatistical optimization algorithm is proposed for super-resolution land cover classification from remotely sensed imagery. The algorithm requires as input, a soft classification of land cover obtained from a remotely sensed image. A super-resolution (sub-pixel scale) grid is defined. The soft land cover proportions (pixel scale) are then transformed into a hard classification (subpixel scale) by allocating hard classes randomly to the sub-pixels. The number allocated per pixel is determined in proportion to the original land cover proportion per pixel. The algorithm optimizes the match between a target and current realization of the two-point histogram by swapping sub-pixel classes within pixels such that the original class proportions defined per pixel are maintained. The algorithm is demonstrated for two simple simulated images. The advantages of the approach are its ability to recreate any target spatial distribution and to work with features that are both large and small relative to the pixel size, in combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.B., Smith, M.O. and Johnson, P.E. (1985) Spectral mixture modelling: a new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 site, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 91, pp. 8098–8112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, P.M. (1997) Mapping sub-pixel boundaries from remotely sensed images, in Innovations in GIS IV (ed., Z. Kemp) (Taylor an1d Francis: London), p. 166–180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, P.M., Cutler, M.E.J. and Lewis, H. (1997) Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol.18, pp. 917–935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, P.M. and Tate, N.J. (2000) Spatial scale problems and geostatistical solutions: a review, Professional Geographer, vol. 52, pp. 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson, P.M. (2001) Super-resolution target mapping from soft classified remotely sensed imagery, Fifth International Conference on GeoComputation. University of Leeds: Leeds, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bezdek, J.C., Ehrlich, R. and Full, W. (1984) FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm, Computers and Geosciences, vol. 10, pp. 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, M., Gunn, S.R. and Lewis, H.G. (1999) Support vector machines for optimal classification and spectral unmixing, Ecological Modelling, vol.120, pp. 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A. G. (1998) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software and User’s Guide, Second Edition. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flack, J., Gahegan, M. and West, G. (1994) The use of sub-pixel measures to improve the classification of remotely sensed imagery of agricultural land, Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, Melbourne, pp. 531–541.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foody, G.M. (1998) Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol.19, pp. 2593–2599.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hopfield, J. and Tank, D.W. (1985) Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems, Biological Cybernetics, vol.52, pp. 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Journel, A.G. and Huijbregts, C. J. (1978) Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jupp, D.L.B., Strahler, A.H. and Woodcock, C.E. (1988) Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images I. Basic theory, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 26, pp. 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, W. (1999) Land cover mapping from optical satellite images employing subpixel segmentation and radiometric calibration, in I. Kanellopoulos, G. Wilkinson and T. Moons, Machine Vision and Advanced Image Processing in Remote Sensing. Springer: London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steinwendner, J., Schneider, W. and Suppan, F. (1998) Vector segmentation using spatial subpixel analysis for object extraction, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 32, pp. 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tatem, A.J., Lewis, H.G., Atkinson, P.M. and Nixon, M.S. (2001a) Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, pp. 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tatem, A.J., Lewis, H.G., Atkinson, P.M. and Nixon, M.S. (2001b) Multiple class land cover mapping at the sub-pixel scale using a Hopfield neural network, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tatem, A.J., Lewis, H.G., Atkinson, P.M. and Nixon, M.S. (2002) Land cover simulation and estimation at the sub-pixel scale using a Hopfield neural network, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 79, pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas, I.L., Benning, V.M., and Ching, N.P. (1987) Classification of Remotely Sensed Images, Bristol, Adam Hilger.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verhoeye et al. (2000) IGARSS2001 Scanning The Present and Resolving the Future, IEEE, Sydney, Australia, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Groenigen, J.-W. (1999) Constrained optimisation of spatial sampling. A Geostatistical Approach, ITC Publication Series, No. 65, ITC: Enschede, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atkinson, P.M. (2004). Super-Resolution Land Cover Classification Using the Two-Point Histogram. In: Sanchez-Vila, X., Carrera, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J. (eds) geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2007-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2115-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics