Skip to main content

Gibrat’s Law: An Overview of the Empirical Literature

  • Chapter
Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Innovation

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 12))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1990), Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and C. Armington (2001), “Gibrat’s Law Reconsidered: The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Establishment Age, Establishment Size and Firm Size”, Working Paper of the Regional Entrepreneurship Catalyst Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. and J. A. C. Brown (1957), The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almus, M. and E. A. Nerlinger (2000), “Testing Gibrat’s Law for Young Firms-Empirical Results for West Germany”, Small Business Economics, 15(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, L. A. N, S. W. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, H. Leschhorn, P. Maass, M. A. Salinger, H. E. Stanley and M. H. R. Stanley (1997), “Scaling Behavior in Economics: Empirical Results for Company Growth”, Journal de Physique I, 7, 621–633

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Amirkhalkhali, S. and A. K. Mukhopadhyay (1993), “The Influence of Size and R&D on the Growth of Firms in the U.S.”, Eastern Economic Journal, 19(2), 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armatte, M. (1995), “Robert Gibrat et la Loi de l’Effet Proportionnel”, Mathematiques Informatiques et Science Humaines, 129(1), 5–55.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Armatte, M. (1998), “Robert Gibrat and the Law of Proportional Effect”, in W. J. Samuels (ed.), European Economists of the Early 20th Century: Studies of Neglected Thinkers of Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Scandinavia, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B. and T. Mahmood (1994), “Firm Selection and Industry Evolution: The Post-Entry Performance of New Firms”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (1999), “Start-up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(7), 965–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., L. Klomp, E. Santarelli and A. R. Thurik (2004), “Gibrat’s Law: Are the Services Different?”, Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L. and G. Trovato (2002), “The Determinants of Growth for Small and Medium Sized Firms”, Small Business Economics, 19(3), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, M. and P. Sestito (1993), “Entry and Growth of Firms: Evidence for the Italian Case”, Unpublished manuscript, Banca d’Italia, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi, G., G. Dosi, M. Lippi, F. Pammolli and M. Riccaboni (2001), “Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(7), 1161–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothner, M. S. (2005), “Relative Size and Firm Growth in the Global Computer Industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(4), 617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourlakis, C. A. (1990), “Probability of Survival and Firm Growth in Greek Manufacturing Industries”, Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE), mimeo, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky, M. (1995), “Estimating the Asymptotic Covariance Matrix for Quantile Regression Models: A Monte Carlo Study”, Journal of Econometrics, 68(2), 303–338.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., J. H. Dunning and R. D. Pearce (1984), “An Analysis of the Growth and Profitability of the World’s Largest Firms 1972 1977”, Kyklos, 37(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1998), “Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms”, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 1947–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.-R. and W.-C. Lu (2003), “Panel Unit Root Test of Firm Size and its Growth”, Applied Economics Letters, 10(4), 343–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesher, A. (1979), “Testing the Law of Proportionate Effect”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and R. Revelli (1989), “The Relationship between Firm Growth and Labor Demand”, Small Business Economics, 1(3), 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., P. Davidsson and W. B. Gartner (2003), “Arriving at the High-growth Firm”, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte A. and E. Papagni (2003), “R&D and the Growth of Fims. An Empirical Analysis of a Panel of Italian Firms”, Research Policy, 32(8), 1003–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droucopoulos, V. (1983), “International Big Business Revisited: On the Size and Growth of the World’s Largest Firms”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 4(3), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P. and A. Hughes (1994), “Age, Size, Growth and Survival: U.K. Companies in the 1980s”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson (1988), “Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries”, Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson (1989), “The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 671–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. (1987a), “The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. (1987b), “Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 95(4), 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fariñas, J. C. and L. Moreno (2000), “Firms’ Growth, Size and Age: A Nonparametric Approach”, Review of Industrial Organization, 17(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy, F. R. and K. Kraft (1991), “Firm Size, Growth and Innovation: Some Evidence from West Germany”, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos, G. and H. Louri (2004), “Corporate Growth and FDI: Are Multinationals Stimulating Local Industrial Development?”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 4(2), 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A., S. Lazarova, G. Urga and C. F. Walters (2003), “Are Differences in Firm Size Transitory or Permanent?”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R. (1931), Les Inégalités Économiques, Paris, Librairie du Recueil Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., J. Wilson and P. Blandon (2002), “Panel Tests of Gibrat’s Law for Japanese Manufacturing”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. (1987), “The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (1998), Statistics with Stata 5, Pacific Grove (CA), Duxbury Press, Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, P. and M. Adams (2002), “Firm Size and Growth in the United Kingdom Life Insurance Industry”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(5), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., K. Stahl and M. Woywode (1998), “Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms. Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4), 453–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. and M. Trainor (2005), “Plant-level Analysis using the ARD: Another Look at Gibrat’s Law”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(3), 492–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. E. and S. J. Prais (1956), “The Analysis of Business Concentration: A Statistical Approach”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 119 (part 2, series A), 150–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. E. and N. Oulton (1999), “Gibrat, Galton and Job Generation”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, 47(2), 153–161.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (2001), “On the Growth of Micro and Small Firms: Evidence from Sweden”, Small Business Economics, 17(3), 213–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. and P. Pashigian (1962), “Firm Size and Rate of Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 70(4), 556–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran and Y. Shin (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 11(1), 53–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, D. (2004), “Is Small Beautiful? The Case of the Swedish IT Industry”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. (1982), “Selection and Evolution of Industry”, Econometrica, 50(5), 649–670.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J. and G. Faggio (2003), “Job Creation, Job Destruction and Employment Growth in Emerging Market Economies”, Economic Systems, 27(2), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. S. (1985), “Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(3), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensink, R., P. van Steen and E. Sterken (2005), “Uncertainty and Growth of the Firm”, Small Business Economics, 24(4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., C. F. Lin and C. S. Chu (2002), “Unit Root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53–78.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lotti F., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (2001), “The Relationship between Size and Growth: The Case of Italian New-born Firms”, Applied Economics Letters, 8(7), 451–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotti, F., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (2003), “Does Gibrat’s Law Hold among Young, Small Firms?”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, J. A. F. and J. Mata (2000), “Box-Cox Quantile Regression and the Distribution of Firm Sizes”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(3), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. and S. Wu (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(8), 1399–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1962), “Entry, Gibrat’s Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms”, American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D. W. (1963), “An Algorithm for Least Squares Estimation of Non-linear Parameters”, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(5), 431–441.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. (1994), “Firm Growth During Infancy”, Small Business Economics, 6(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. and P. Portugal (2004), “Patterns of Entry, Post-Entry Growth and Survival”, Small Business Economics, 22(3), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloughan, P. (1995), “Simulation of Concentration Development from Modified Gibrat Growth-Entry-Exit Processes”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(4), 405–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1999), “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 653–678.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffermayr, M. and Ch. Bellak (2002), “Why Foreign-owned Firms are Different: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence for Austria”, in R. Jungnickel (ed.), Foreign-owned Firms — Are They Different?, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 13–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. D. and B. A. Kirchhoff (1989), “Formation, Growth and Survival; Small Firm Dynamics in the U.S. Economy”, Small Business Economics, 1(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piergiovanni, R., E. Santarelli, L. Klomp and A. R. Thurik (2003), “Gibrat’s Law and the Firm Size/Firm Growth Relationship in Italian Services”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 102, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G. (1995), “Early Life-cycle Behaviour of Micro-Firms in Scotland”, Small Business Economics, 7(1), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli E. (1997), “La relazione tra dimensione iniziale, sopravvivenza e crescita delle imprese nel settore turistico in Italia”, Statistica, 57(2), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. and Ch. P. Bonini (1958), “The Size Distribution of Business Firms”, American Economic Review, 48(4), 607–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A. and G. Whittington (1975), “The Size and Growth of Firms”, Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J. (1997), “Gibrat’s Legacy”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschoegl, A. (1996), “Managerial Dis(economies) of Scale: The Case of Regional Banks in Japan”, Reginald H. Jones Center for Management and Policy, Strategy and Organization, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper No. 96-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vennet, R. (2001), “The Law of Proportionate Effect and OECD Bank Sectors”, Applied Economics, 33(4), 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Variyam J. N. and D. S. Kraybill (1992), “Empirical Evidence on Determinants of Firm Growth”, Economics Letters, 38(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J. (1992), “Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989”, Small Business Economics, 4(2), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J. (1994), “The Post-Entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santarelli, E., Klomp, L., Thurik, A.R. (2006). Gibrat’s Law: An Overview of the Empirical Literature. In: Santarelli, E. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Innovation. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32314-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics