Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting Trajectories of Urban Growth in the Coastal Southeast

  • Chapter
Changing Land Use Patterns in the Coastal Zone

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Evironmental Management ((SSEM))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J. and K. Lu. 2003. Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina: A GIS-based integrated approach. Conservation Ecology 8(2):2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. and K. Lu. 2004. Artificial neural network vs. binary logistic regression: Two alternative models for predicting urban growth in the Myrtle Beach region. Report submitted to NOAA’s Land Use-Coastal Ecosystem Study (LU-CES) Program. (Unpublished manuscript, 26p.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. A. 1986. Cognitive capabilities of a parallel system. In, Bienestoch, E., F. Fogelman-Souli, and Weisbuch (eds.), Disordered Systems and Biological Organization. NATO ASI Series, F20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. A. and E. Rosenfeld, editors. 1988. Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. MIT-Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. A., R. M. Golder, and G. L. Murphy. 1986. Concepts in distributed systems, pp. 634:260–272. In, Szu, H. H. (ed.), Optical and Hybrid Computing. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellington, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. 1991. Searching for Certainty: What Scientists Can Know about the Future. William Morrow, New York, NY. 496p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E., S. Ghosh, and C. L. Scofield. 1988. An application of multiple neural network learning system to emulation of mortgage underwriting judgments. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks 11:459–466. San Diego, CA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Barra, T. 1989. Integrated Land Use and Transport Modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 179p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echenique, M. H., A. D. Flowerdew, J. D. Hunt, T. R. Mayo, I. J. Skidmore, and D. C. Simmonds. 1990. The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and Dortmund. Transportation Reviews 10:309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausett, L. 1994. Fundamentals of Neural Networks: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 461p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M. 2001. Computational neural networks—Tools for spatial data analysis, pp. 15–34. In, Fischer, M. M. and Y. Leung (eds.), Geo-Computational Modeling: Techniques and Applications. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M. and S. Gopal. 1994. Artificial neural networks. A new approach to modeling interregional telecommunication flows. Journal of Regional Science 34:503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimblett, R. H., G. L. Ball, and A. W. Guisse. 1994. Autonomous rule generation and assessment for complex spatial modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning 30:13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, P. 1996. Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources: Using evidential reasoning and artificial neural network techniques for geological mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62:513–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R. 1990. Neurocomputing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 433p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. 1988. The “Neural” phonetic typewriter. Computer 21(3):11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gun, Y., B. Boser, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel. 1990. Handwritten digit recognition with a backpropagation network, pp. 396–404. In, Touretsky, D. S. (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., K. S. Lu, M. Espey, and J. S. Allen. 2005. Modeling urban sprawl and land use change in a coastal area: A neural network approach. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island. 20p. http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=16329&ftype=.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, R. P. 1989. Review of neural networks for speech recognition. Neural Computation 1:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, J. B. and N. L. Hill. 2000. Land conversion in South Carolina: State makes the Top 10 list, pp. 2–3. Jim Self Center on the Future, Strom Thurmond Institute, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. http://www.strom.clemson.edu/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, K. S., J. S. Allen, and G. Liu. 2005. Using innovative neural networks to simulate and assess land use change and its ecological impact under different growth scenarios. Paper submitted to the Interdisciplinary Environmental Association for the 11th International Conference on the Environment, Orlando, Florida. 25p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. S. and W. Pitts. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5:115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. T., R. S. Sutton, and P. J. Werbos (eds.). 1990. Neural Networks for Control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 544p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D. and B. Widrow. 1989. Fast learning in networks of locally tuned processing units. Neural Computation 1:281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. 1993. Modeling spatial interaction using a neural net, pp. 147–164. In, Fischer, M. M. and P. Nijkam, (eds.), GIS Spatial Modeling and Policy. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. and C. Openshaw. 1997. Artificial Intelligence in Geography. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 348p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M., M. G. Turner, and J. B. Drake. 1998. Landscape change and habitat availability in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and Olympic Peninsula. Journal of Ecological Applications, 9(4):1288–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, D., J. Blair, and E. D. Kelly. 1997. Debate on the theories of David Rusk. Edited transcript of proceedings in The Regionalist 2(3):11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. J. and C. R. Rosenberg. 1986. Nettalk: A parallel network that learns to read aloud. The Johns Hopkins University Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technical Report JHU/EECS-86/01, 32. Reprinted in Anderson and Rosenfeld, pp. 663–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z. 1997. The syntax and semantics of urban modeling: Versions vs. visions. Paper submitted to the Land Use Modeling Workshop at U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD. 17p.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Population and housing unit counts: Population from 1790 to 1990. http://www.Census.gov/population/censusdata/table 16.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. 1994. The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical information system for agricultural land-suitability assessment. Environment and Planning A 26:265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, M., R. L. Mackett, and D. C. Simmonds. 1991. One city, three models, comparisons of land use/transport policy simulation models for Dortmund. Transport Review 11:107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widrow, B. and S. D. Stearns. 1985. Adaptive Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 528p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. and C. J. Webster. 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automat and multi-criteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design 25:103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A. G. O. and X. Li. 2002. Urban simulation using neural networks and cellular automata for land use planning, pp. 452–464. In, Richardson, D. and P. Van Oosterom, (eds.), Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Strom Thurmond Institute of Government and Policy Affairs, Clemson University, Silas Pearman Boulevard, Clemson, SC, 29634-0125, USA

    Jeffery S. Allen & Kang Shou Lu

Authors
  1. Jeffery S. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kang Shou Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University at Albany State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 1222, USA

    G. S. Kleppel

  2. Sea Grant Consortium, 287 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC, 29407, USA

    M. Richard DeVoe

  3. Georga Sea Grant Program, University of Georga, Athens, GA, 30602-3636, USA

    Mac V. Rawson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allen, J.S., Lu, K.S. (2006). Predicting Trajectories of Urban Growth in the Coastal Southeast. In: Kleppel, G.S., DeVoe, M.R., Rawson, M.V. (eds) Changing Land Use Patterns in the Coastal Zone. Springer Series on Evironmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29023-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation