Summary
In this chapter we describe how the productivity of homogeneous robots scales with group size. Economists found that the addition of workers into a group results in their contributing progressively less productivity; a concept called the Law of Marginal Returns. We study groups that differ in their coordination algorithms, and note that they display increasing marginal returns only until a certain group size. After this point the groups’ productivity drops with the addition of robots. Interestingly, the group size where this phenomenon occurs varies between groups using differing coordination methods. We define a measure of interference that enables comparison, and find a high negative correlation between interference and productivity within these groups. Effective coordination algorithms maintain increasing productivity over larger groups by reducing the team’s interference levels. Using this result we are able to examine the productivity of robotic groups in several simulated domains in thousands of trials. We find that in theory groups should always add productivity during size scale-up, but spatial limitations within domains cause robots to fail to achieve this ideal. We believe that coordination methods can be developed that improve a group’s performance by minimizing interference. We present our findings of composite coordination methods that provide evidence of this claim.
This material is based upon work supported in part by the NSF under grant #0222914 and ISF grant #1211/04. Sarit Kraus is also affiliated with UMIACS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R.C. Arkin and T. Balch. Cooperative multiagent robotic systems. In Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots. MIT Press, 1998.
T. Balch. Reward and diversity in multirobot foraging, In IJCAI-99 Workshop on Agents Learning About, From and With other Agents, 1999.
Tucker Balch. www.teambots.org.
Stanley L. Brue. Retrospectives: The law of diminishing returns. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3): 185–192, 1993.
Phil R. Cohen and Hector J. Levesque. Teamwork. Nous, 25(4):487–512, 1991.
G. Dudek, M. Jenkin, and E. Milios. A taxonomy for multi-agent robotics. Robot Teams: From Diversity to Polymorphism, Balch, T. and Parker, L.E., eds., Natick, MA: A K Peters, 3:3–22, 2002.
Ariel Felner, Roni Stern, and Sarit Kraus. PHA*: Performing A* in unknown physical environments. In AAMAS 2002, pages 240–247.
J. Fredslund and M. Matarić. A general, local algorithm for robot formations. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, special issue on Multi Robot Systems, pages 837–846, 2002.
D. Goldberg and M. Matarić. Interference as a tool for designing and evaluating multi-robot controllers. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 637–642, 1997.
D. Goldberg and M. Matarić. Design and evaluation of robust behavior-based controllers for distributed multi-robot collection tasks. In Robot Teams: From Diversity to Polymorphism, pages 315–344, 2001.
Barbara J. Grosz and Sarit Kraus. Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269–357, 1996.
M. Jager and B. Nebel. Dynamic decentralized area partitioning for cooperating cleaning robots. In ICRA 2002, pages 3577–3582.
Markus Jager and Bernhard Nebel. Decentralized collision avoidance, deadlock detection, and deadlock resolution for multiple mobile robots. In IROS, 2001.
Nicholas R. Jennings. Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence, 75(2): 195–240, 1995.
C. Jones and M. Matarić. Adaptive division of labor in large-scale minimalist multi-robot systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IROS), pages 1969–1974, 2003.
Sarit Kraus. Negotiation and cooperation in multiagent environments. Artificial Intelligence, 94(l–2):79–97, 1997.
C. Ronald Kube and Hong Zhang. Collective robotic intelligence, pages 460–468, 1992.
Stacy Marsella, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Gal A. Kaminka, Ion Muslea, and Milind Tambe. On being a teammate: experiences acquired in the design of RoboCop teams. In Oren Etzioni, Jörg P. Müller, and Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, editors, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents’99), pages 221–227, Seattle, WA, USA, 1999. ACM Press.
E. Ostergaard, G. Sukhatme, and M. Matari. Emergent bucket brigading-a simple mechanism for improving performance in multi-robot constrainedspace foraging tasks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.
L. Parker. Alliance: An architecture for fault-tolerant multi-robot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2):220–240, 1998.
Craig W. Reynolds. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4):25–34, 1987.
A. Rosenfeld, G. Kaminka, and S. Kraus. Adaptive robot coordination using interference metrics. In The Sixteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Valencia, Spain, August 2004.
P. Rybski, A. Larson, M. Lindahl, and M. Gini. Performance evaluation of multiple robots in a search and retrieval task, In Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing, 1998.
Pedro Sander, Denis Peleshcuk, and Barbara Grosz. A scalable, distributed algorithm for efficient task allocation. In AAMAS 2002, pages 1191–1198.
Paul Scerri, Yang Xu, Elizabeth Liao, Justin Lai, and Katia Sycara. Scaling teamwork to very large teams. In AAMAS’ 04: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 888–895. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
M. Schneider-Fontan and M. Mataric. A study of territoriality: The role of critical mass in adaptive task division. 1996.
O. Shehory, S. Kraus, and O. Yadgar. Emergent cooperative goal-satisfaction in large scale automated-agent systems. Artificial Intelligence journal, 110(l):1–55, 1999.
M. Tambe. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7:83–124, 1997.
R.T. Vaughan, K. Støy, G.S. Sukhatme, and M.J. Matarić. Go ahead, make my day: robot conflict resolution by aggressive competition. In Proceedings of the 6th int. conf. on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenfeld, A., Kaminka, G.A., Kraus, S. (2006). A Study of Scalability Properties in Robotic Teams. In: Scerri, P., Vincent, R., Mailler, R. (eds) Coordination of Large-Scale Multiagent Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27972-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27972-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26193-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27972-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)