Skip to main content

Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity

  • Chapter
Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research

Part of the book series: International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship ((IHSE,volume 1))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1974a). Limited knowledge and economic analysis. American Economic Review, 64(1),1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1974b). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1984). General Equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid (2000). The Social Life of Information. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and V.J. Vanberg (1991). The market as a creative process. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1991). The mathematization of economic theory. American Economic Review, 81, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In J. Dewey, A.W. Moore, H.C. Brown, G.H. Mead, B.H. Bode, H.W. Stuart, J.H. Tufts and H.M. Kallen (eds.), Creative Intelligence. Essays in the Pragmnatic Attitude. New York: Henry Holt, pp. 3–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A.v. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I. and N.L. Schwartz (1975). Market structures and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, R. (1909). Just So Stories for Little Children. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, 1933 edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1976). From Mises to Shackle: An essay on Austrian economics and the Kaleidic Society. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. (1984). Internal organization in a dynamic context: Some theoretical considerations. In M. Jussawalla and H. Ebenfield (eds.), Communication and Information Economics: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J. (1999). Knowledge, Institutions, and Evolution in Economics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1982). The technology of foolishness. In J.G. March and J.P. Olsen (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics, 8th edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter, G.W. (1956). Monopoly, bigness, and progress. Journal of Political Economy, 64(6), 520–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.D (2001a). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001b). Effectual reasoning in entrepreneurial decision making: Existence and bounds. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management 2001, Washington DC. Full version available at eff.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1967). Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. American Economic Review, 57, 524–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S. (1979). Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1996). The architecture of complexity. Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative Behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Volume 3, pp. 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard, H.H. (1958). Competition, oligopoly, and research. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1954). Elements of Pure Economics; or, The Theory of Social Wealth (Trans. Jaffe, W.). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S.R., Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. In: Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24080-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24519-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics