Abstract
The paper aims to show how by elaborating the Peircean terms used in the title creativity in learning processes and in scientific discoveries can be explained within a semiotic framework. The essential idea is to emphasize both the role of external representations and of experimenting with those representations (“diagrammatic reasoning”), and to describe a process consisting of three steps: First, looking at diagrams “from a novel point of view” (“theoric transformation”) offers opportunities to synthesize elements of these diagrams which have never been perceived as connected before. Second, by forming those observed syntheses to “new objects” of thinking, and by signifying these objects through new signs (“hypostatic abstraction”), new means of thinking and acting are created (to be used for “theorematic deductions”). And finally, by applying these new means — in proofs, for instance — the “intelligibility” of new discoveries and their power to explain problematic facts must be tested.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakker, A. (in preparation). Design research in statistics education. On computer tools and diagrammatic reasoning. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CDBeta Press.
Bochner, S. (1966). The role of mathematics in the rise of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dörfler, W. (2004). Diagrammatic thinking: Affordances and constraints. This volume.
Hilbert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1973 <1932>). Anschauliche Geometrie. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.
Hintikka, J. (1983 <1980>). C. S. Peirce’s ‘First Real Discovery’ and its Contemporary Relevance. In E. Freeman (Ed.), The relevance of Charles Peirce. La Salle, Ill.: Hegeler Institut, 107–118.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001a). The 1903 Classification of Triadic Sign-Relations. In J. Queiroz (Ed.), Digital encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Online: http://www.digitalpeirce.org/hoffmann/sighof.htm.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001b). Peirces Zeichenbegriff: seine Funktionen, seine phänomenologische Grundlegung und seine Differenzierung. Online: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/idm/semiotik/Peirces_Zeichen.html.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001c). Skizze einer semiotischen Theorie des Lernens. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 22(3/4), 231–251.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003a). Erkenntnisentwicklung. Ein semiotisch-pragmatischer Ansatz. Dresden: Philosophische Fakultät der Technischen Universität (Habilitationsschrift 2002).
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003b). Peirce’s “Diagrammatic Reasoning” as a Solution of the Learning Paradox. In G. Debrock (Ed.), Process Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution. Amsterdam Rodopi Press, 121–143.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003c). Semiotik als Analyse-Instrument. In M. H. G. Hoffmann (Ed.), Mathematik verstehen — Semiotische Perspektiven. Hildesheim: Franzbecker, 34–77.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (in print). How to get it. Diagrammatic reasoning as a tool of knowledge development and its pragmatic dimension. Foundations of Science.
Hull, K. (1994). Why hanker after logic? Mathematical imagination, creativity and perception in Peirce’s systematic philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30, 271–295.
Ketner, K. L. (1985). How Hintikka Misunderstood Peirce’s Account of Theorematic Reasoning. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 21, 407–418.
Levy, S. H. (1997). Peirce’s Theoremic/Corollarial Distinction and the Interconnections Between Mathematics and Logic. In N. Houser & D. D. Roberts, & J. van Evra (Eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 85–110.
Otte, M. (1997). Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics from the Perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy. In M. Otte, & M. Panza (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis in mathematics. History and philosophy. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 327–364.
Peirce. (CP). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 1931–1935, 1958. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Peirce. (EP). The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893), Vol. 2 (1893–1913). Bloomington and Indianapolis 1992 + 1998: Indiana University Press.
Peirce. (NEM). The new elements of mathematics by Charles S. Peirce (Vol. I–IV). The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Highlands, N. J., 1976: Mouton/Humanities Press.
Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36, 357–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffmann, M.H.G. (2005). Signs as Means for Discoveries. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24269-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24270-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)