Skip to main content

Signs as Means for Discoveries

Peirce and His Concepts of “Diagrammatic Reasoning,” “Theorematic Deduction,” “Hypostatic Abstraction,” and “Theoric Transformation”

  • Chapter
Activity and Sign

Abstract

The paper aims to show how by elaborating the Peircean terms used in the title creativity in learning processes and in scientific discoveries can be explained within a semiotic framework. The essential idea is to emphasize both the role of external representations and of experimenting with those representations (“diagrammatic reasoning”), and to describe a process consisting of three steps: First, looking at diagrams “from a novel point of view” (“theoric transformation”) offers opportunities to synthesize elements of these diagrams which have never been perceived as connected before. Second, by forming those observed syntheses to “new objects” of thinking, and by signifying these objects through new signs (“hypostatic abstraction”), new means of thinking and acting are created (to be used for “theorematic deductions”). And finally, by applying these new means — in proofs, for instance — the “intelligibility” of new discoveries and their power to explain problematic facts must be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakker, A. (in preparation). Design research in statistics education. On computer tools and diagrammatic reasoning. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CDBeta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochner, S. (1966). The role of mathematics in the rise of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, W. (2004). Diagrammatic thinking: Affordances and constraints. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1973 <1932>). Anschauliche Geometrie. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1983 <1980>). C. S. Peirce’s ‘First Real Discovery’ and its Contemporary Relevance. In E. Freeman (Ed.), The relevance of Charles Peirce. La Salle, Ill.: Hegeler Institut, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001a). The 1903 Classification of Triadic Sign-Relations. In J. Queiroz (Ed.), Digital encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Online: http://www.digitalpeirce.org/hoffmann/sighof.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001b). Peirces Zeichenbegriff: seine Funktionen, seine phänomenologische Grundlegung und seine Differenzierung. Online: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/idm/semiotik/Peirces_Zeichen.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2001c). Skizze einer semiotischen Theorie des Lernens. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 22(3/4), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003a). Erkenntnisentwicklung. Ein semiotisch-pragmatischer Ansatz. Dresden: Philosophische Fakultät der Technischen Universität (Habilitationsschrift 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003b). Peirce’s “Diagrammatic Reasoning” as a Solution of the Learning Paradox. In G. Debrock (Ed.), Process Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution. Amsterdam Rodopi Press, 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2003c). Semiotik als Analyse-Instrument. In M. H. G. Hoffmann (Ed.), Mathematik verstehen — Semiotische Perspektiven. Hildesheim: Franzbecker, 34–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. (in print). How to get it. Diagrammatic reasoning as a tool of knowledge development and its pragmatic dimension. Foundations of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, K. (1994). Why hanker after logic? Mathematical imagination, creativity and perception in Peirce’s systematic philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketner, K. L. (1985). How Hintikka Misunderstood Peirce’s Account of Theorematic Reasoning. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 21, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. H. (1997). Peirce’s Theoremic/Corollarial Distinction and the Interconnections Between Mathematics and Logic. In N. Houser & D. D. Roberts, & J. van Evra (Eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (1997). Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics from the Perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy. In M. Otte, & M. Panza (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis in mathematics. History and philosophy. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 327–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce. (CP). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 1931–1935, 1958. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce. (EP). The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893), Vol. 2 (1893–1913). Bloomington and Indianapolis 1992 + 1998: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce. (NEM). The new elements of mathematics by Charles S. Peirce (Vol. I–IV). The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Highlands, N. J., 1976: Mouton/Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36, 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffmann, M.H.G. (2005). Signs as Means for Discoveries. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics