Abstract
Mobile wireless computing has been identified as a critical new application of information technology; however, only a few case studies are available focusing on the organisational or social issues related to the deployment of these technologies. This paper provides a rich description of the situated activities of a particular set of mobile workers (police officers) during the implementation of mobile wireless laptops. The paper describes two implementations of one type of technology in a single organisation. The implementations took very different trajectories; in one the technology was resisted and eventually withdrawn while in the other it was embraced and embedded into working practices. The paper clearly demonstrates how ambiguity, over time, influenced the trajectory of the implementation process in the different sites. The paper explores the use of an alternative theoretical approach to the use of technological frames to understand ambiguity and implementation of technology: Strauss’s Theory of Action. Using Strauss’s concept of trajectory the paper demonstrates the importance of understanding the relationship between ambiguity and the implementation of mobile information technology.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, D. L., R. R. Nelson, et al. (1992). “Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: a replication.” MIS Quarterly 16(2): 227–247.
Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. Framing the domains of IT management: projecting the furture threough the past. R. W. Zmud. Cincinnati: OH, Pinnaflex Press: 85–104.
Barrett, M. I. (1999). “Challenges of EDI adoption for electronic trading in the London Insurance Market.” European Journal of Information Systems 8:1–15.
Baruch, Y. and L. Lambert (2002). Organizational Anxiety: Applying psychological metaphor into organizational theory. The 4th International Conference on Organizational Discourse: Word-views, Work-views and World Views.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA, Blackwell.
Ciborra, C. U. (1999). “Notes on Improvisation and Time.” Organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9: 77–94.
Ciborra, U. C. and G. F. Lanzara (1994). “Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organsiations.” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4(61–86).
Dahlbom, B. and F. Ljungberg (1998). “Mobile Informatics.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 10(112): 227–234.
Davidson, E., J (2002). “Technology frames and framing: a socio-cognitive investigation of requirments determination.” MIS Quarterly 26(4): 329–358.
DeSanctis, G. and P. Monge (1999). “Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations.” Organization Science 10(6): 693–703.
Fineman, S. (1996). Emotion and organising. Handbook of organization studies. S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord. London, Sage: 543–565.
Frissen, V. A. J. (2000). “ICTs in the rush hour of life.” Information Society 16: 65–75.
Gallivan, M. J. (2001). “Organizational Adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework.” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32(3): 51–85.
Glaser, B. and A. Strauss (1968). Time for dying. Chicago, Aldine.
Harris, S. G. (1994). “Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema based perspective.” Organizational Science 5(3): 309–321.
Healey, P. G. T. and A. J. Reeves (2001). Mobility and Participatory Status. Interventions in the social, cultural and interactional analysis of mobility, ubiquity and information & communication technology, Cumberland lodge, windsor, uk.
Henfridsson, O. (2000). “Ambiguity in IT adaptation: making sense of First Class in a social work setting.” Information Systems Journal 10(2): 87–104.
Hodgkinson, G. P. (2002). “Comparing Managers’ Mental Models of Competition: Why Self-report Measures of Belief Similarity Won’t Do.” Organization Studies 23(1): 63–72.
Hodgkinson, G. P. and P. R. Sparrow (2002). The competent organisation. Buckingham: UK, Open University Press.
Jenkins, M. and S. Floyd (2001). “Trajectories in the Evolution of Technology: A Multi-level Study of Competition in Formula 1 Racing.” Organization Studies 22(6): 945–969.
Kakihara, M. and C. Sørensen (2001). Mobility Reconsidered: Topological Aspects of Interaction. IRIS’24, Ulvik, Norway, University of Bergen.
Kakihara, M. and C. Sørensen (2002). Mobility: An Extended Perspective. Thirty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35), Big Island, Hawaii., IEEE.
Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, et al. (1999). “Information technology adoption accross time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs.” Managment Information Systems Quarterly 23(2): 183–213.
Lee, H. (1999). “Time and information technology: Monochronicity, polychronicity and temporal symmetry.” European Journal of Information Systems 8(1):16–26.
Lee, H. and J. Liebenau (2000). “Temporal effects of information systems on business processes: focusing on the dimensions of temporality.” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10(3).
Lyytinen, K. and Y. Yoo (2002). “Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing.” Information Systems Research 13(4): 377–388.
Mantovani, G, and A. Spagnolli (2001). “Legitimating technologies: ambiguity as a premise for negotation in a networked institution.” Information Technology & People 14(3): 301–320.
McCaskey, M. B. (1982). The executive challenge: managing change and ambiguity. Marshfield: MA, Pitman.
Nandhakumar, J. (2001). “Managing time in a software factory: termporal and spatial organisations of IS development activities.”
Nulden, U. and J. Lundin (2002). Introduction to the Mobile Informatics Mini-Track. Thirty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35), Big Island, Hawaii., IEEE.
O’Dowd, D. J. (1998). Beating Crime: HMIC Thematic Inspection Report 1998. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/hmic/beatcrim.htm, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary.
Okoli, C., B. Ives, et al. (2002). The Mobile Conference Information System Unleashing Academic Conferences with Wireless Mobile Computing. 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2002, Big Island, Hawaii.
Orlikowski, W., J and D. C. Gash (1994). “Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12: 174–207.
Orlikowski, W. J. and J. Yates (2002). “It’s About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations.” Organization Science 13(6).
Povey, K. (2001). Open all hours: A thematic inspection report on the role of police visibility and accessibility in public reassurance. London, Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary: 1–191.
Siau, K., L. Ee-Peng, et al. (2001). “Mobile Commerce: Promises, Challenges, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Database Management.
Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York, Aldine De Gruyter.
Tan, F. B. and M. G. Hunter (2002). “THE REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE: A METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF COGNITION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS.” MIS Quarterly 26(1): 39–57.
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modem culture: critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: a social theory of the media. Cambridge., Polity Press.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11(4): 342–365.
Walsh, J. P. (1995). “Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane.” Organization Science 6(3): 280–321.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London, Sage.
Wiberg, M. (2001). Collaboration on the move: An empirical study of mobile work at Telia Nära. 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 24), Ulvik in Hardanger, Norway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Allen, D., Wilson, T.D. (2005). Action, Interaction and the Role of Ambiguity in the Introduction of Mobile Information Systems in a UK Police Force. In: Lawrence, E., Pernici, B., Krogstie, J. (eds) Mobile Information Systems. MOBIS 2004. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 158. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22874-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22874-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22851-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22874-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)