Skip to main content

Assessing Active Self-directed Learning

  • Chapter
New Learning

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Airasian, P.W. (1994). Classroom assessment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P.R.J. (1995). Leren en instructie; Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and Instruction; Psychology of the learner and the learning process]. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1987). The Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.F. (1986). Effective Study Test. Iowa City, IA: ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V.V. (1998). Leerstijlen nader geanalyseerd [Learning styles analyzed more closely]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jager, B., & Reezigt, G.J. (1996). Onderwijseffectiviteit en metacognitieve vaardigheden [Educational efficiency and metacognitive skills]. Internal report. Groningen: GION.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F.P.C.M. (1992). Zelfstandig leren. Regulatie van het leerproces en leren reguleren: Een procesbenadering [Independent learning. Regulation of the learning process and learning to regulate: A process approach]. Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, L. (1995). Studievaardigheidsvragenlijsten, een inventarisatie [Questionnaires for study skills, an inventory]. LOS Contact, 15(3), 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1997). Assessment as a major influence on the present and future of learning and instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(5), 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G.E. (1987). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshout-Mohr, M. (1997). Nieuwe ‘vaardigheden’ in het onderwijs: Discussiestuk [New’ skills’ in education: Discussion paper]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstanun Institute and Graduate School of Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshout-Mohr, M., & Meijer, J. (1998). Validering van AlvaBavo: Een toets voor algemene vaardigheden in de basisvorming [Validation of AlvaBavo: A test for general skills in basic education]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Institute, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshout-Mohr, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Broekkamp, H. (1999). Mapping situations in classroom and research: Eight types of instructional learning episodes. Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J., & Tait, H. (1994). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Research into Learning and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1988). Verbal report data on cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In C.E. Weinstein, E.T. Goetz & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Advances in assessment models, methods and practices. In: D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.,), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 899–926). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA, Simon & Schuster Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W.B., & Blank, W.E. (1993). Review and critique of available learning-style instruments for adults. New directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 59, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, H. (1994). Instrumentenonderzoek leerlingmetingen bovenbouw voortgezet onderwijs [Instrument research of student assessments of the upper school in secondary education]. Internal report. Groningen: GION.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Dunbar, S.B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: expectations and validation crtiteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Watkins, D., & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hongkong. Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, W.B., Michael, JJ., & Zimmerman, W.S. (1988). Study Attitudes and Methods Survey. San Diego: EDITS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis-Geers, J. (1995). PROBES: Procedure ter bevordering van effectief en efficiënt studeergedrag [PROBES: Procedure to promote effective and efficient studying behavior]. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis-Geers, J. (1998). Vragenlijst Studiemethoden (VSM) op internet [Questionnaire Study methods (VSM) on the internet]. LOS Contact, 18(1), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.L., Swing, S.R., Braverman, M.T., & Buss, R. (1982). Students’ aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 535–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peverly, S.T. (1990). The assessment of academic studying: An alternative to existing methods. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference in Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R. (1988). A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In J.S. Stark & L.A. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W.J. (1995). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Needham Heights, MA: Allen & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R.E., Wade, S.E., Trathen, W., & Lapan, R. (1989). The selective attention strategy and prose learning. In C.B. McCormick, G.E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 159–190). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosendaal, A., & Vermunt, J. (1996). Leerstijlen en zelfstandig leren in het voorportaal van het studiehuis [Learning styles and self-directed learning at the gate of the’ study house’]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 21, 336–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J.M., Cisero, C.A., & Carlo, M.S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 201–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellings, G.L.M., & Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (1996). Main points in an instructional text, as identified by students and by their teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 742–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R.R. (1983). Learning styles of college students. In R. Dillon & R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouwenburg, H.C. (1990). Diagnostiek van studeerproblemen [Diagnostics for studying problems]. LOS Contact, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouwenburg, H.C., & Schilder, A.E. (1998). Handleiding bij de vragenlijst Studie-aanpak leerlingen bovenbouw HAVO-VWO [Manual to the questionnaire Study approach for students of the upper school of HAVO-VWO]. Groningen: Studie Ondersteuning, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severiens, S. (1999). Vragenlijst Motivatie, Leerproces en Leerstrategieën [Questionnaire Motivation, Learning process and Learning strategies]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Graduate School of Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M.L., Hynd, C.R., Nist, S.L., & Burell, K.I. (1997). College academic assistance programs and practices. Educational Psychology Review, 9(1), 39–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano-Flores, G., & Shavelson, R.J. (1997). Development of performance assessments in science: Conceptual, practical and logical issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topman, R.M., Kleijn, W.C., Van der Ploeg, H.M., & Masset, E.A (1991). Test anxiety, cognitions, study habits and academic performance: a prospective study. In K.A. Hagtvet (Ed.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 7). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (1986). Markeren van kerngedeelten in studieteksten: Een proces-produkt benadering [Cueing of key phrases in instructional texts: A process-product approach]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (1992). Cognitieve strategieën als onderwijsdoel [Cognitive strategies as an educational goal]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., Simons, P.R.J., & Volet, S. (in press). Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In P.R.J. Simons, J.L. van der Linden, & T.M. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kammen, D. (1999). Werken met portfolio’s daagt uit om te tonen waar je voor staat [Working with portfolios challenges, to show where you stand]. Didaktief & School, 29(1/2), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijswijk, F.A.W.M., & Vermunt, J.D.H.M. (1987). Vaardig studeren: studie aanpak adviespakket voor OU studenten. (Deel I, II en III) [Studying skillfully: Advisory package for study approach of Open University students (parts I, II and III)]. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., & Yang, J. (1986). Het traceren van leerprocessen via hardop-leermethode en een procesvragenlijst [Tracing learning processes by means of the thinking-aloud method and a process questionnaire]. In W.J. Van den Linden & J.M. Wijnstra (Eds.), Ontwikkelingen in de methodologie van het onderwijsonderzoek. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, J., Veenman, M.V.J., & Prins, F.J. (submitted). Identifying technical students at risk: self reported learning styles versus behavioral measures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D.H.M. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs: Naar procesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and directing learning processes in higher education: Towards a process-directed instruction in self-directed learning]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. (1998). Leeractiviteiten van leerlingen [Students’ learning activities]. In L. Verschaffel & J.D. Vermunt (Eds.), Het leren van leerlingen. Onderwijskundig lexicon, editie lll (pp. 29–46). Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorst, H.C.M. (1991). Leren & Studeren: Ontwikkelingen van een vragenlijst leer-en studievaardigheid [Learning & Studying: Developments of a questionnaire for learning and studying skills]. Nijmegen: Berkhout Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E., & Hume, L.M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E., & Meyer, D.K. (1996). Learning strategies: Teaching and Assessing. In E. De Corte & F.E. Weinert (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 423–428). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E., Palmer, D.R., & Schulte, A.C. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, Florida: H&H publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, P., & Jones, D.L. (1992). The use of portfolios in performance assessment. New directions for education reform, 1(2), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing Active Self-directed Learning. In: Simons, RJ., van der Linden, J., Duffy, T. (eds) New Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6296-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47614-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics