Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA): I. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959–5967.
Wold, S., Alhano, C., Dunn, W.J., Edlund, U., Esbenson, K., Geladi, P., Hellbcrg, S., Lindberg, W. and Sjöström, M., Multivariate data analysis in chemistry. In Kowalski. B. (Ed.) Chemometrics: Muthoinalics and statistics in chemistry. Reidel, Dordrecht. The Netherlands, 1984, p. 17–95.
Dunn, W.J., III, Wold, S., Edlund, U., Hellberg, S. and Gasteiger, J., Multivariate structure-activity relationship between data from abattery of biological testsand anensemble of structure descriptors: The PLS method. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 3 (1984) 131–137.
Geladi, P., Notes on the history and nature of partial least squares (PLS) modeling, J. Chemometrics, 2 (1988) 231–246.
Wold, S., Crass-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal component models, Technometrics, 4 (1978) 397–405.
Diaconis, P. and Efron. B., Computer-intensive methodsfor statistics, Sci. Am., 116 (1984) 96–117.
Cramer III, R.D., Bunce, J.D. and Patterson, D.E., Cross-validation, bootstrapping and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 7(1988) 18–25.
Thibaut, U., Applications of CoMFA anil related 3D QSAR approaches. In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in drug design: Theory, methods and applications, ESCOM, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 661–696.
Clark, M. and Cramer III, R.D., The probability of chance correlation using partial least-squares (PLS), Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 12 (1993) 137–145.
Kroemer, R.T., Ettmayer, P. and Hecht, P., 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationships of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 proteina.se inhibitors: comparative molecular field analysis of 2-hetero-substituted statine derivatives — implications for the design of novel inhibitors, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 4917–4928.
Kellog, G.E., Semus, F.E. and Abraham, D.J., HINT: A new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA, J. Comptit.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 545–552.
Kim, K.H. and Martin, Y.C., Direct prediction of dissociation-constants (PKAS) of clouidin-like imida-zolines, 2-substituted imidazoles, and 1-methy-2-substituled-imidazoles from 3D structures using a comparative molecular-field analysis (CoMFA) approach, J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 2056–2060.
Greco, G., Novellino, E., Silipo, C. and Vittoria, A., Comparative molecular-field analysis on a set of muscarinic agonists, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 10 (1991) 289–299.
Klebe, G and Abraham. U., On the prediction of binding-properties of drug molecules by comparative molecular-field analysis, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 70–80.
Floersheim, P., Nouzlak, J. and Weber, H.P., Experience with comparative molecular-field analysis. In Wermuth, C.G. (Ed.) Trends in QSAR and molecular modeling 92, ESCOM, Leiden. The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 227–232.
Marsili, M., Floersheim, P. and Dreiding, A.S., Generation and comparison of space-filling molecular-models, Comput. Chem., 7 (1983) 175–181.
Kroemer, R.T. and Hecht. P., Replacement of steric 6–12 potential-derived interaction energies by atom-based indicator variables in CoMFA leads to models of higher consistency. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design., 9 (1995) 205–212.
Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., Cross-validation, bootstrapping, and partial least-squares compared with multiple-regression in conventional QSAR Studies, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 7 (1988) 18–25.
Cramer III, R.D., DePriest. S.A., Patterson, D.E. and Hecht, P., The developing practice of comparative molecular-field analysis. In Kubinyi, H., (Ed.) 3D QSAR in drug design, ESCOM, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 465–485.
Calder, J.A., Wyatl, J.A., Frenkel, D.A. and Casida, J.F., CoMFA validation of the superposition of 6 classes of compounds which block GABA receptors noncompetitively, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7(1993)45–60.
Rault, S., Bureau, R., Pilo, J.C. and Robba, M., Comparative molecular-field analysis of CCK-A antagonists using field-fit as an alignment technique — a convenient guide to design new CCK-A ligands, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design. 6 (1992) 553–568.
Alien, M.S., Tan, Y.-C., Trudell, M.L., Narayanan, K., Schindler, L.R., Martin, M.J., Schultz, C., Hagen, T.J., Koehler. K.F., Codding, P.W., Skolnick, P. and Cook, J.M., Synthetic and computer-assisted analyses of the pharmaiophore for the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist site, J. Med. Chem., 33 (1990) 2343–2357.
Allen, M.S., LaLoggia, A.J., Dorn, L.J., Martin, M.J., Costatino, G., Hagen, T.J., Koehler, K.F., Skolnick, P. and Cook, J.M., Predictive Binding of beta-carboline inverse agonists and antagonists via the CoMFA GOLPE approach, J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 4001–4010.
Kroemer, R.T., Liedl, K.R. and Hecht. P., Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA): A comparison of molecular electrostatic and coulomb potentials, J. Comput. Chem., 17(1996) 1296–1308.
Gasteiger, J. and Marsilli, M., Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity — a rapid access to atomic charges, Tetrahedron, 36 (1980) 3219–3228.
Dewar, M.J.S. and Thiel. W., Ground states of molecules: 38.The MNDO method — approximations and parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99 (1977) 4899–4907.
Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy. E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P., AM1: A new general purpose quantum chemical mechanical molecular model, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 3902–3909.
Stewart, J.J.P., Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods: 1. Method, J. Comp. Chem., 10 (1989) 209–220.
Mulliken, R.S., Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave junctions. I., J. Chem. Phys., 23(1955) 1833–1840.
Singh, U.C. and Kollman, P. A., An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules, J. Comp. Chem., 5(1984) 129–145.
Besler, B.H., Merz, K.M., Jr. and Kollman, P.A., Atomiccharges derived fiom semiempirical methods, J. Comp. Chem., 11 (1990) 431–439.
Chirlian, L.F. and Francl, M.M., Atomic charges derived from electrostatic potentials — a detailed study, J. Comp. Chem., 8 (1987) 894–905.
Breneman, C.M. and Wiberg, K.B., Deterinining atom-centred monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials — the need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis, J. Comp. Chem., 11(1990)361–373.
Dehnath, A.K., Jiang, S., Strick, N., Lin, K., Haberlield, P. and Neurath, A.R., Three-dimensional structure-activity analysis of a series of porphyrin derivatives with anli-HIV-1 activity targeted on the V 3 loop of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1, J. Med. Chem., 37(1994) 1099–1108.
Avery, M.A., Gao, F., Chong W.K.M., Mehrotra, S. and Milhous, W.K., Structure-activity relationships of the antimalarial agent artemisinin: 1. Synthesis and comparative molecular field analysis of C-9 analogs of artemisinin and I0-dexoartemisinin, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 4264–4275.
Carroll, F.I., Mascarella, S.W., Kuzemko, M.A., Gao, Y., Abraham, P., Lewin, A.H., Boja, J.W. and Kuhar, M.J., Synthesis, ligand binding, and QSAR (CoMFA and classical study of 3β–3′ substituted phenyl)-, 3β–14′-substituted phenyl)-, and 3β-(3′,4′-disubstituted phenyl) tropane 2β-carboxyli cacid methyl esters, J. Med. Chem. 37 (1994) 2865–2873.
Tong, W., Collantes, E.R., Chen, Y. and Welsch, W.J., A comparative molecular-field analysis study of N-benzylpiperidines as acelylcholesterinesterase inhibitors, J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 380–387.
Kroemer, R.T., Koutsilieri, E., Hecht, P., Liedl, K.R., Riederer, P. and Kornhuber, J., Quantitative analysis of the structural requirements for blockade of the NMDA receptor at the PCP binding site, J. Med. Chem., (in press).
Martin. Y.C., Bures, M.G., Dahaner, E.A., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I. and Pavlik, P., A fast approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 7 (1993) 83–102.
Gamper, A.M., Winger, R.H., Liedl, K.R., Sotriffer, C.A., Varga, J.M., Kroemer, R.T. and Rode, B.M., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of haptens docked to the multispecijic antibody IgE(Lb4), J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 3882–3888.
Goodsell, D.S. and Olson A.J., Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 8 (1990) 195–202.
Marshall, G.R., Barry, C.D., Bosshard, H.E., Dammkoehler, R.A. and Dunn, D.A., The conformational parameters in drug design, In Olson, E.C. and Christoffersen, R.E. (Eds.) Computer-assisted drug design, ACS Symp. Series, Vol. 112, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1979, pp. 205–226.
Thibaut, U., Folkers, G., Klebe, G., Kubinyi, H., Merz, A. and Rognan, D., Recommendations for CoMFA studies and 3D QSAR publications. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 13(1994) 1–3.
Kroemer, R.T. and Hecht, P., A new procedure for improving the predictiveness of CoMFA-models and its application to a set of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 9 (1995) 396–406.
Silipo, C. and Hansch, C., Correlation analysis: Its application to the structure-activity relationship of triazines inhibiting dihyidrofolate reductase, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1975) 6849–6861.
Baroni, M., Constantino, G., Cruciani, G., Riganelli, D., Valigi, SR. and Clementi, S., Generating optimal linear PLS estimations (GOLPE): An advanced chemometric tool for handling 3D-QSAR problems, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 12 (1993) 9–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kroemer, R.T., Hecht, P., Guessregen, S., R. Liedl, K. (1998). Improving the Predictive Quality of CoMFA Models. In: Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G., Martin, Y.C. (eds) 3D QSAR in Drug Design. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46858-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46858-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4791-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46858-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive