Skip to main content

The Case and Movement for Securing People and Nature

  • Chapter
Green Growth That Works

Abstract

Growth in human population and economic activity has dramatically transformed our planet since the Industrial Revolution. While driving significant improvements in human well-being, these forms of growth also deeply eroded the natural capital embodied in Earth’s lands, waters, and biodiversity. Rapid economic development has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and raised the standard of living and life expectancies of many more, but the costs of this success cast a long shadow over future well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Key References

  • Bryan, Brett A., Lei Gao, Yanqiong Ye, Xiufeng Sun, Jeffery D. Connor, Neville D. Crossman, Mark Stafford-Smith et al. 2018. “China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency.” Nature 559, no. 7713:193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, Gretchen C. 1997. Nature’s Services. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mello, Luiz, and Mark A. Dutz. 2012. Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies. Paris: OECD and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, Sandra, Unai Pascual, Marie Stenseke, Berta Martín-López, Robert T. Watson, Zsolt Molnár, Rosemary Hill et al. 2018. “Assessing nature’s contributions to people.” Science 359, no. 6373:270–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John. 1998. “Accounting for the triple bottom line.” Measuring Business Excellence 2, no. 3:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, Carl, Steve Carpenter, Thomas Elmqvist, Lance Gunderson, Crawford S. Holling, and Brian Walker. 1992. “Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations.” AMBIO 31, no. 5:437–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, Madhav, and Ramachandra Guha. 1992. This Fissured Land. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerry, Anne D., Stephen Polasky, Jane Lubchenco, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Griffin, Mary Ruckelshaus et al. 2015. “Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 24:7348–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, Maike, Kevin Berry, Tomas Chaigneau, Tracie Curry, Robert Heilmayr, Patrik JG Henriksson, Jonas Hentati-Sundberg et al. “Inequality and the biosphere.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43:61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Caroline, Helen Suich, Bhaskar Vira, and Georgina M. Mace. 2014. “Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world.” Global Environmental Change 28:263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Michael. 1993. The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, AnnMari, Monica Hammer, Carl Folke, and Robert Costanza, eds. 1994. Investing in Natural Capital. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, Peter, Heather Tallis, Taylor H. Ricketts, Gretchen C. Daily, and Stephen Polasky, eds. 2011. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, Eric F., and Patrick Meyfroidt. 2011. “Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, no. 9:3465–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Jianguo. 2014. “Forest sustainability in China and implications for a telecoupled world.” Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 1, no. 1:230–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Jianguo, Andrés Viña, Wu Yang, Shuxin Li, Weihua Xu, and Hua Zheng. 2018. “China’s environment on a metacoupled planet.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, no. 43:1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Zhiyun, Hua Zheng, Yi Xiao, Stephen Polasky, Jianguo Liu, Weihua Xu, Qiao Wang et al. 2016. “Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital.” Science 352, no. 6292:1455–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, James, Genevieve Bennett, Nathaniel Carroll, Allie Goldstein, and Michael Jenkins. 2018. “The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services.” Nature Sustainability 1, no. 3:136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichman, J. A. 2016. The Politics of Inclusive Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme). 2011. Towards a Green Economy. United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vira, Bhaskar. 2015. “Taking natural limits seriously: Implications for development studies and the environment.” Development and Change 46, no. 4:762–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Brian, Crawford S. Holling, Stephen R. Carpenter, and Ann Kinzig. 2004. “Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems.” Ecology and Society 9, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2012. Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mandle, L. et al. (2019). The Case and Movement for Securing People and Nature. In: Mandle, L., Ouyang, Z., Salzman, J.E., Daily, G. (eds) Green Growth That Works. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-64283-004-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics