Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Results of arthrospine assisted percutaneous technique for lumbar discectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Avaialable minimal invasive arthro/endoscopic techniques are not compatible with 30 degree arthroscope which orthopedic surgeons uses in knee and shoulder arthroscopy. Minimally invasive “Arthrospine assisted percutaneous technique for lumbar discectomy” is an attempt to allow standard familiar microsurgical discectomy and decompression to be performed using 30° arthroscope used in knee and shoulder arthroscopy with conventional micro discectomy instruments.

Materials and Methods

150 patients suffering from lumbar disc herniations were operated between January 2004 and December 2012 by indiginously designed Arthrospine system and were evaluated retrospectively. In lumbar discectomy group, there were 85 males and 65 females aged between 18 and 72 years (mean, 38.4 years). The delay between onset of symptoms to surgery was between 3 months to 7 years. Levels operated upon included L1-L2 (n = 3), L2-L3 (n = 2), L3-L4 (n = 8), L4-L5 (n = 90), and L5-S1 (n = 47). Ninety patients had radiculopathy on right side and 60 on left side. There were 22 central, 88 paracentral, 12 contained, 3 extraforaminal, and 25 sequestrated herniations. Standard protocol of preoperative blood tests, x-ray LS Spine and pre operative MRI and pre anaesthetic evaluation for anaesthesia was done in all cases. Technique comprised localization of symptomatic level followed by percutaneous dilatation and insertion of a newly devised arthrospine system devise over a dilator through a 15 mm skin and fascial incision. Arthro/endoscopic discectomy was then carried out by 30° arthroscope and conventional disc surgery instruments.

Results

Based on modified Macnab’s criteria, of 150 patients operated for lumbar discectomy, 136 (90%) patients had excellent to good, 12 (8%) had fair, and 2 patients (1.3%) had poor results. The complications observed were discitis in 3 patients (2%), dural tear in 4 patients (2.6%), and nerve root injury in 2 patients (1.3%). About 90% patients were able to return to light and sedentary work with an average delay of 2 weeks and normal physical activities after 2 months.

Conclusion

Arthrospine system is compatible with 30° arthroscope and conventional micro-discectomy instruments. Technique minimizes approach related morbidity and provides minimal access corridor for lumbar discectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Destandau J. A special device for endoscopic surgery of lumbar disc herniation. Neurol Res 1999;21:39–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE, Rice-Wyllie L, Wellington R, Smith MM, et al. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technical note. Neurosurgery 2002;51:S129–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foley KT, Smith MM. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 1997;3:301–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of spinal canal. N Engl J Med 1934;211:210–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith L. Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 1964;187:137–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hijikata S, Yarngislii M, Nakayama T, Omori K. Percutaneous discectomy: A new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 39:5–13, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Onik G, Mooney V, Maroon JC, Wiltse L, Helms C, Schweigel J, et al. Automated percutaneous discectomy: A prospective multi-institutional study. Neurosurgery 1990;26:228–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation-surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine J 2003;3 2 Suppl: 60S–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choy DS, Case RB, Fielding W, Hughes J, Liebler W, Ascher P. Percutaneous laser nucleolysis of lumbar disks. N Engl J Med 1987;317:771–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg 1977;4:74–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy: A conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1978;3:175–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Palmer S. Use of a tubular retractor system in microscopic lumbar discectomy: 1 year prospective results in 135 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2002;13:e5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ebeling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ. Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1986;81:45–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pappas CT, Harrington T, Sonntag VK. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992;30:862–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ranjan A, Lath R. Microendoscopic discectomy for prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. Neurol India 2006;54:190–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jhala A, Mistry M. Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases. Indian J Orthop 2010;44:184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kulkarni AG, Bassi A, Dhruv A. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technique and results of 188 cases. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyson T, Mariak Z, Jadeszko M, Kochanowickz J, Lewko J. Results of microendoscopic discectomy. Department of neurosurgery; medical university of Bialystok, Lyzol@sezam. pl. Am J Hematol 2007;24a: 15–276.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oztürk C, Tezer M, Aydogan M, Sarier M, Hamzaoglu A. Posterior endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Acta Orthop Belg 2006;72:347–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L. Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:24–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaushal M, Sen R. Posterior endoscopic discectomy: Results in 300 patients. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:81–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Morita C. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation: Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love’s method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1599–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, et al. Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 2006;15:577–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH. The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;8:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arthroscopy and Spinal Endoscopy Centre, Trinity Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Chandigarh, India

    Mohinder Kaushal

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Trinity Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Chandigarh, India

    Mohinder Kaushal

Authors
  1. Mohinder Kaushal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohinder Kaushal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaushal, M. Results of arthrospine assisted percutaneous technique for lumbar discectomy. IJOO 50, 228–233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181777

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181777

Key words

MeSH terms

Search

Navigation