Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beautiful Physics: Re-vision of Aesthetic Features of Science Through the Literature Review

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study intends to reveal the aesthetic features of physics through the literature review and to give some implications for teaching the beauty of physics. Among the papers published in the internationally prominent journals, indexed in SCI, SSCI, and A&HCI, this study selects a total of 88 articles dealing with aesthetics of physics, and categorizes the aesthetics of physics into intrinsic and extrinsic representation of the aesthetics. As a result, simplicity, symmetry, harmony, and unity, centering on mathematical formalism, are found as the intrinsic aspects of aesthetics, whereas elegance, wonder and sublimity are mentioned as the extrinsic aspects of the aesthetics, which were evoked from the intrinsic aesthetics above. In terms of ontological and epistemological nature of aesthetics, modern physics does not give a clear answer about the simplicity of nature due to the indeterminacy, and the aesthetic judgment is linked to both intrinsic nature of an object and extrinsic sense of human mind, and finally aesthetic evaluation is determined by empirical worth of aesthetics and shared meaning of aesthetic attitude. Thus, this study gives some implications for the use of visual image in physics and teaching aesthetics of physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. T. Cushing, Philosophical concepts in physics: the historical relation between philosophy and scientific theories (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Maudlin, The metaphysics within physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. E. Rihll, Greek science (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Oh, Lectures on aesthetics (Seoul National University Press, Seoul, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Newton, The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Cooper and M. Hunter, Robert Hooke: tercentennial studies (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Flood, M. McCartney and A. Whitaker, James Clerk Maxwell: perspectives on his life and work (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H, Poincaré, The foundations of science (Science Press, Lancaster, 1946), p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. A. M. Dirac, Sci. Am. 208, 45 (1963).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Heisenberg, Physics and beyond: encounters and conversations (Harper & Row, New York, 1971). p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Root-Bernstein and M. Root-Bernstein, Sparks of genius: the 13 thinking tools of the world’s most creative people (Houghton Mifflin, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. I. Miller, Insights of genius: imagery and creativity in science and art (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. C. Vitz and A. B. Glimcher, Modern art and modern science: the parallel analysis of vision (Praeger, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Guillemin, Leonardo 43, 59 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Miller, Leonardo 28, 185 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. S. Baigrie, Electricity and magnetism: a historical perspective (Greenwood Press, London, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. C. Maxwell, A treatise on electricity and magnetism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1954).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Kepler, The harmonies of the world (CreateSpace, Charleston, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Jho, J. Kor. Assoc. Sci. Educ. 34, 755 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Shlain, Art & physics: parallel visions in space, time, and light (Quill/W. Morrow, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Strosberg, Art and science (Abbeville Press, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Holton, Leonardo 34, 127 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Adcock, Art J. 44, 249 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Ambrosio, Visual Stud. 29, 250 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Jho, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 64, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Girod, C. Rau and A. Schpeige, Sci. Ed. 87, 574 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Eisner and K. Powell, Curriculum Inq. 32, 131 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. A. F. Kuipers, Synthese 131, 291 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. W. McAllister, Beauty and revolution in science (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Rescher, Aesthetic factors in natural science (University Press of America, Lanham, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. E. McGrath, The foundations of dialogue in science & religion (Blackwell, Oxford, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. A. F. Kuipers, Synthese 131, 291 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. W. McAllister, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 11, 245 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. T. S. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. J. Griffiths, Revolutions in twentieth-century physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013), p. 80.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to quantum mechanics (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Hunter and S. Schaffer, Robert Hooke: new studies (The Boydell Press, Woodbridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  38. U. Montano, Euro. J. Phil. Sci. 3, 133 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Kant, Critique of judgment (Cosimo Classics, New York, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. M. Cahn and A. Meskin, Aesthetics: a comprehensive anthology (Blackwell, Malden, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  41. G. Engler, Leonardo 27, 207 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Sheppard, Aesthetics: an introduction to the philosophy of art (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. D. LeCompte, J. Preissle and R. Tesch, Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (Academic Press, San Diego, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  44. P. Crowther, Defining art, creating the canon: artistic value in an era of doubt (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Engler, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 27 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. Yang and J. Park, J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 16, 932 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. O. Levrini and P. Fantini, Sci. & Educ. 22, 1895 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. H. Weyl, Symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1952).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Zee, Fearful symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. Penrose, Sci. 19, 6 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. H. Stephenson, Sci. Context 18, 553 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Parkinson, Surrealism, art and modern science: relativity, quantum mechanics, epistemology (Yale University Press, London, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Pantidos, K. Ravanis, K. Valakas and E. Vitoratos, Sci. & Educ. 23, 621 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. E. Mamchur, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 1, 209 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. E. Panofsky, Isis 47, 3 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  56. P. Kosso, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 39 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  57. G. Engler, Br. J. Aesthet. 30, 24 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  58. A. Caranfa, Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 20, 151 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Landsman, Foundations of quantum theory: from classical concepts to operator algebras (Springer, Cham, 2017).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. M. Jammer, The conceptual development of quantum mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  61. L. L. Heywood, J. R. Garcia and D. S. Wilson, Sci. & Educ. 19, 505 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. H. W. De Regt, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 95 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  63. T. Kulka, Br. J. Aesthet. 29, 197 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  64. D. Jacquette, J. Hist. Ideas 51, 659 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Y. Hadzigeorgiou and R. Schulz, Sci. & Educ. 23, 1963 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. H. Jho, J. Sci. Educ. 41, 402 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. K. Young, Narr. 19, 149 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. W. H. Brock, The history of chemistry: a very short introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. B. Kouznetsov, Diogenes 29, 81 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  70. M. Livio, The accelerating universe: infinite expansion, the cosmological constant, and the beauty of the cosmos (John Wiley, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  71. C. S. Todd, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 22, 61 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  72. J. Allday, Quantum reality: theory and philosophy (CRC Press, New York, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  73. E. Schrödinger, Ann. Phys. (Berl.) 384, 361 (1926).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. E. Schrödinger, Ann. Phys. (Berl.) 384, 489 (1926).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. E. Schrödinger, Ann. Phys. (Berl.) 384, 734 (1926).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. E. Schrödinger, Ann. Phys. (Berl.) 386, 109 (1926).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. P. Slattery and N. Langerock, Curr. Inq. 32, 349 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  78. P. Feyerabend, Against method: outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge (Verso, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  79. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. Edin. 59, 122 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Encyclopedia Britannica, Mathematical formalism, https://doi.org/www.britannica.com/topic/formalismphilosophy-of-mathematics (Accessed April 4, 2018).

  81. Oxford Dictionaries, Elegance, https://doi.org/en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/elegance (Accessed April 8, 2018).

  82. D. B. Wallace and H. E. Gruber, Creative people at work: twelve cognitive case studies (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989), Chap. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  83. J. W. McAllister, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 7 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  84. J. Perell’o and Altaió, Leonardo 41, 232 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  85. A. Johnson, Biodiversity Conserv. 4, 758 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  86. J. Brooke and G. Cantor, Reconstructing nature: the engagement of science and religion (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  87. R. S. Root-Bernstein, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 61 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  88. N. Barker and C. Iacobuzio-Donahue, Hidden beauty: exploring the aesthetics of medical science (Schiffer, Atlgen, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  89. B. Greene, Elegant universe: superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory (W. W. Norton, New York, 1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. K. C. Cole, The universe and the teacup: the mathematics of truth and beauty (Harcourt Brace & Company, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  91. M. Girod, Stud. Sci. Educ. 43, 38 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  92. S. Chandrasekhar, Truth and beauty: aesthetics and motivations in science (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  93. T. X. Thuan, Chaos and harmony: perspectives on scientific revolutions of the twentieth century (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. H. Jho, J. Res. Curr. Instr. 21, 132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  95. R. N. Giere, Understanding scientific reasoning (Harcourt, Brace and Company, Fort Worth, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  96. R. N. Giere, Science without laws (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  97. R. N. Giere, Scientific perspectivism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  98. A. Rueger, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 16, 49 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  99. D. Davies, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 12, 25 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  100. P. M. Harman, The natural philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. B. Mahon, The man who changed everything: the life of James Clerk Maxwell (Wiley, Chichester, 2003).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. M. R. Matthews, Science, worldviews and education (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), Chap. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  103. R. F. Carlson, Science & Christianity: four views (InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  104. J. W. McAllister, Br. J. Aesthet. 31, 332 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  105. A. T. Winterbourne, Br. J. Aesthet. 21, 253 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  106. I. A. Richards, C. K. Ogden and J. Wood, The foundations of aesthetics (International Publishers, New York, 1925), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  107. A. I. Tauber, The elusive synthesis: aesthetics and science (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997), Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  108. R. Feynman, Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman! (Norton, New York, 1985), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  109. H. Jho, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 64, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  110. P. Geimer, Sci. Context 17, 467 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  111. G. Poggi, Inventing futurism: the art and politics of artificial optimism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  112. J. van der Veen, Am. Educ. Res. J. 49, 356 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  113. M. Duchamp, Nude descending a staircase, No. 2 in 1912 https://doi.org/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c0/Duchamp-NudeDescendingaStaircase.jpg/400px-Duchamp-NudeDescendingaStaircase.jpg (Accessed March 15, 2018).

  114. G. Balla, Dynamism of a dog on a leash, https://doi.org/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/36/GiacomoBalla%2C1912%2CDynamismofaDogonaLeash%2Coiloncanvas%2C89.8x109.8cm%2CAlbright-KnoxArtGallery.jpg/1920px-GiacomoBalla%2C1912%2CDynamismofaDogonaLeash%2Coiloncanvas%2C89.8x109.8cm%2CAlbright-KnoxArtGallery.jpg(Accessed March 17, 2018).

  115. J. van der Veen, Am. Educ. Res. J. 49, 356 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  116. H. Lin, Z-R. Hong, C-C. Chen and C-H. Chou, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 33, 1199 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  117. X. Arapaki and D. Koliopoulos, Sci. & Educ. 20, 797 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  118. M. Izquierdo-Aumerich and A. Aduriz-Bravo, Sci. & Educ. 12, 27 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  119. I. Galili and B. Zinn, Sci. & Educ. 16, 441 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  120. I. Galili, Sci. & Educ. 22, 1911 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  121. M. C. Flannery, Sci. Educ. 75, 577 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  122. B. Goertzel, From complexity to creativity: explorations in evolutionary, autopoietic, and cognitive dynamics (Springer, New York, 1997). Chap. 14.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  123. M. W. Wartofsky, Phil. Ex. 24/25, 5 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  124. J. Stolnitz, J. Aesthet. Art Crit. 20, 131 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  125. J. W. McAllister, Am. Sci. 86, 174 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Education, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Korea

    Hunkoog Jho

Authors
  1. Hunkoog Jho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hunkoog Jho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jho, H. Beautiful Physics: Re-vision of Aesthetic Features of Science Through the Literature Review. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73, 401–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.73.401

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.73.401

Keywords

Search

Navigation