Skip to main content
Log in

Amphetamine increases motivation of humans and mice as measured by breakpoint, but does not affect an Electroencephalographic biomarker

  • Special Issue/Preclinical Assays
  • Published:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Translation of drug targets from preclinical studies to clinical trials has been aided by cross-species behavioral tasks, but evidence for brain-based engagement during task performance is still required. Cross-species progressive ratio breakpoint tasks (PRBTs) measure motivation-related behavior and are pharmacologically and clinically sensitive. We recently advanced elevated parietal alpha power as a cross-species electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarker of PRBT engagement. Given that amphetamine increases breakpoint in mice, we tested its effects on breakpoint and parietal alpha power in both humans and mice. Twenty-three healthy participants performed the PRBT with EEG after amphetamine or placebo in a double-blind design. C57BL/6J mice were trained on PRBT with EEG (n = 24) and were treated with amphetamine or vehicle. A second cohort of mice was trained on PRBT without EEG (n = 40) and was treated with amphetamine or vehicle. In humans, amphetamine increased breakpoint. In mice, during concomitant EEG, 1 mg/kg of amphetamine significantly decreased breakpoint. In cohort 2, however, 0.3 mg/kg of amphetamine increased breakpoint consistent with human findings. Increased alpha power was observed in both species as they reached breakpoint, replicating previous findings. Amphetamine did not affect alpha power in either species. Amphetamine increased effort in humans and mice. Consistent with previous reports, elevated parietal alpha power was observed in humans and mice as they performed the PRBT. Amphetamine did not affect this EEG biomarker of effort. Hence, these findings support the pharmacological predictive validity of the PRBT to measure effort in humans and mice and suggest that this EEG biomarker is not directly reflective of amphetamine-induced changes in effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are made available upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Mark A. Geyer, Ms. Mahalah R. Buell, and Mr. Richard F. Sharp for their support on these studies.

Funding

These studies were funded by NIMH UH3MG109168.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MN: Manuscript writing, Data Curation, Data Analysis, Investigation.

SGB: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Supervision, Project Administration, Editing.

JAT: Investigation, Data curation, Supervision, Project Administration.

JEK: Investigation, Data curation, Supervision, Project Administration.

LB: Investigation, Data Curation.

BZR: Investigation, Data curation, Supervision, Project Administration.

JAN: Investigation, Data curation.

GAL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing— Review & Editing, Funding acquisition.

NRS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing, Investigation, Data curation, Medical Monitoring of Test Subjects, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding acquisition.

JLB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing— Review & Editing, Funding acquisition

JFC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing, Funding acquisition.

JWY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared W. Young.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Practices

The data and materials for all experiments are available upon request.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noback, M., Bhakta, S.G., Talledo, J.A. et al. Amphetamine increases motivation of humans and mice as measured by breakpoint, but does not affect an Electroencephalographic biomarker. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 24, 269–278 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-023-01150-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-023-01150-z

Keywords

Navigation