Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantic and repetition priming effects for Deese/Roediger—McDermott (DRM) critical items and associates produced by DRM and unrelated study lists

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two lexical decision experiments investigated priming for a critical item (CI, sleep) and its related yoked associate (YA, blanket) when one had been studied in a related Deese/Roediger—McDermott (DRM) list (Experiments 1 & 2) or a list of totally unrelated words (Experiment 2) and the other had been nonstudied. Semantic priming from the related DRM list occurred for nonstudied CIs (but not YAs) regardless of whether the CI received within-test priming from its studied related YA during the lexical decision task, though the effect in the absence of within-test priming averaged across experiments was only significant by a one-tailed test. Also averaged across experiments, repetition priming occurred for both studied CIs and YAs when they had been studied in related DRM lists whether or not there was also within-test priming from a nonstudied related yoked pairmate, though individual effects within the two experiments were sometimes not significant. Repetition priming boosted semantic priming from related DRM lists less for CIs than for YAs, similar to the finding that memory discriminability is poorer for CIs than for YAs in episodic recognition. This smaller repetition priming boost for CIs than for YAs occurred to the same degree when the CIs or YAs were studied in an unrelated list. When nonstudied CIs and YAs were totally unrelated to all previously studied items and separated by 3-7 items in the lexical decision task, a YA produced a small 16 msec priming effect for its CI, averaged across both experiments. The implications of these results for the activation account of the DRM false-memory effect and for single-prime versus multiple-prime long-term semantic priming effects are discussed. The online addendum may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J., &Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • nBalota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002).The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Available at elexicon .wustl.edu/, Washington University.

  • Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word-frequency effects in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M., &Joordens, S. (1997). Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1059–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (2005).The science of false memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., &Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., &Wippich, W. (2000). On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures.Cognitive Psychology,40, 227–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coane, J. H., &McBride, D. M. (2006). The role of test structure in creating false memories.Memory & Cognition,34, 1026–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenbring, G. L., &Briand K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959a). Influence of interitem associative strength upon immediate free recall.Psychological Reports,5, 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959b). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., &MacLeod, C. M. (2006). Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.Memory,14, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchek, J. M., &Neely, J. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency ?? levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.Memory & Cognition,17, 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., &Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs.Psychological Methods,1, 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency.Psychological Bulletin,125, 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., &Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, T. W., Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., &Ritschel, L. (2003). Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.American Journal of Psychology,116, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L., &Starns, J. J. (2005). False memories lack perceptual detail: Evidence from implicit word-stem completion and perceptual identification tests.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. D., &Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2003). Long-term semantic transfer: An overlapping-operations account.Memory & Cognition,31, 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M., & Watson, J. M. (in press). Predicting semantic priming at the item-level.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joordens, S., &Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1083–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joordens, S., &Besner, D. (1992). Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: Implications for models of memory representation and retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahana, M. J., &Greene, R. L. (1993). Effects of spacing on memory for homogeneous lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, S. (1995). The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.Memory & Cognition,23, 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövdén, M., &Johansson, M. (2003). Are covert verbal responses mediating false implicit memory?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 724–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, E. J., McDermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L. (2004). Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?Memory,12, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, D. M., Coane, J. H., &Raulerson, B. A. (2006). An investigation of false memory in perceptual implicit tasks.Acta Psychologica,123, 240–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E. (2004). Distinguishing true from false memories via lexical decision as a perceptual implicit test.Australian Journal of Psychology,56, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E., &Murphy, B. (2000). Implicit false memory: Effects of modality and multiple study presentations on long-lived semantic priming.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P. (2005).Semantic Priming. UK: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, M. L., Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2007). The roles of spreading activation and retrieval mode in producing false recognition in the DRM paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,56, 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1989). Experimental dissociations and the episodic/ semantic memory distinction. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.).Varieties of memory and consciousness. Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 229–270). Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H., Johnson, J. D., Neill, W. T., &Hutchison, K. A. (1999).Is there memory to be found in “false memory?” Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H., Schmidt, S. R., &Roediger, H. L., III (1983). Inhibition from related primes in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 196–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H., &Tse, C.-S. (2007). Semantic relatedness effects on true and false memories in episodic recognition: A methodological and empirical review. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.),The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 315–353). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.

  • Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance: Vol. 5 (pp. 669–682). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., &Neely, J. H. (1992). Dissociative masked repetition priming and word frequency effects in lexical decision and episodic recognition tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 152–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. J., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science,8, 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001a). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller, & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Gallo, D. A. (2001b). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis.Psychological Bulletin & Review,8, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., &Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.).Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1995).Micro Experimental Laboratory (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention.Memory & Cognition,7, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, J. A., Besner, D., &Carr, T. H. (2005). Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated.Visual Cognition,12, 284–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, J. A., &Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 596–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1992). Resolving empirical inconsistencies concerning priming, frequency, and nonword foils in lexical decision.Language & Speech,35, 295–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, C.-S., &Neely, J. H. (2005). Assessing activation without source monitoring in the DRM false memory paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,53, 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tussing, A. A., &Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tussing, A. A., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.American Journal of Psychology,114, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verfaellie, M., Page, K., Orlando, F., &Schacter, D. L. (2005). Impaired implicit memory for gist information in amnesia.Neuropsychology,19, 760–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. P., Malone, C. P., Swiergosz, M. J., &Amberg, M. D. (2000). On the generality of false recognition reversal.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. H. (1948). The sense of touch and common feeling. In W. Dennis (Ed.),Readings in the history of psychology (pp. 155–156). NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Originally published in 1846)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, C. E., &Marsolek, C. J. (2003). Discriminability reductions in false recognition: A measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 747–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, C. E., &Marsolek, C. J. (2006). Do instructional warnings reduce false recognition?Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002). False memory and the discrepancyattribution hypothesis: the prototype-familiarity illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, R., &Pecher, D. (2002). False memories and lexical decision: Even twelve primes do not cause long-term semantic priming.Acta Psychologica,109, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, SS 369, University at Albany, State University of New Yor, 12222, Albany, NY

    Chi-Shing Tse & James H. Neely

Authors
  1. Chi-Shing Tse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James H. Neely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Shing Tse.

Additional information

This research was supported by a Presidential Fellowship awarded to the first author by the University at Albany, State University of New York. Experiment 1 was conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a Master of Arts degree for the first author under the direction of the second author, and its results were presented at the 2005 annual convention of the American Psychological Society in Los Angeles.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tse, CS., Neely, J.H. Semantic and repetition priming effects for Deese/Roediger—McDermott (DRM) critical items and associates produced by DRM and unrelated study lists. Memory & Cognition 35, 1047–1066 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193477

Keywords

Search

Navigation