Skip to main content
Log in

Cycles of solar activity and the configurations of planets

  • Published:
Moscow University Physics Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper, using the parameter—the average difference between the heliocentric longitudes of the planets Venus, Earth and Jupiter—the strong link found 22-year and 11-year cycles of solar activity with the lowest values of the parameter. The envelope curve of the minimum values of this parameter is well described as the conjunctions of the three planets, when they are almost in a straight line from the sun, which causes the maximum of solar activity, and the conjunctions in the larger longitudinal sector (25–30 degrees), which occur much more frequently and are accompanied by different combinations of planets on the opposite side of the Sun, which also cause the maximum of solar activity. Location of these planets on opposite sides of the Sun in various combinations is very well compatible with the parameter used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Wolf, Astr. Mitt. 8, 183 (1859).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. W. Brown, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 60, 599 (1900).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. B. Shostakovich, Tr. Irkutsk. Magn. Observ., Nos. 2–3 (1928).

  4. J. Malberet, L’Astronomie 39, 503 (1925).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. H. Clayton, Smith. Misc. Coll. 106, 3870 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. D. Jose, Astron. J. 70, 193 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. G. Surdin, in Dynamics of Star Systems (URSS, Moscow, 2001), p. 32 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Trellis, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 262, 376 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. V. Fairbridge and J. N. Shirley, Solar Phys. 110, 191 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Charvatova and J. Strejntik, Bull. Astron. Czech. 42, 90 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. C. Prokudina, Tr. Gos. Astron. Inst. P.K. Shternberga 64, 145 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. I. Khlystov, Vestn. Kiev. Univ., No. 24, 61 (1982).

  13. A. I. Khlystov, Tr. Gos. Astron. Inst. P.K. Shternberga 62, 111 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Khlystov, V. P. Dolgachev, and L. M. Domozhilova, Biofizika 37, 547 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Khlystov, V. P. Dolgachev, and L. M. Domozhilova, Tr. Gos. Astron. Inst. P.K. Shternberga 64, 91 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. P. Okhlopkov, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 66, 634 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. I. F. Nikulin, in Proceedings of the Cycles of Activity on Sun and Stars, Moscow, Russia, 2009 (Glav. Astron. Observ. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Saint Petersburg, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. A. Sukharev, All Catastrophes of the Earth (Enio, Odessa, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Okhlopkov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.P. Okhlopkov, 2012, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Fizika, 2012, No. 4, pp. 59–64.

About this article

Cite this article

Okhlopkov, V.P. Cycles of solar activity and the configurations of planets. Moscow Univ. Phys. 67, 377–383 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134912040108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134912040108

Keywords

Navigation