Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental effects on species richness of macrophytes in Slovak streams

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

The effect of 19 environmental variables on species richness of macrophytes was studied in 39 Slovak streams. The studied streams were poor in species; in total, 88 macrophyte taxa were found and the average number of macrophytes per sampling site was 4, ranging from 0 to15. The most frequently occurring macrophytes were filamentous algae (occurrence at 38.6% of sampling sites), followed by Rhynchostegium riparioides (28.4%) and Phalaris arundinacea (19.3%). The strongest environmental gradient in the sampling site detected by factor analysis (factor 1 explains more than 32% variability) is related to the portion of artificial banks, shading by woody vegetation along banks, flexuosity of stream course and the portion of natural land cover in the contact zone of the stream, and can be interpreted as a natural-anthropogenic gradient. The following variables had the highest correlations with species richness of macrophytes: shading by woody vegetation (r=−0.507), portions of artificial bank (r=0.488), flexuosity (r=−0.457) and distance from stream source (r=0.388).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P., et al., Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England, Biol. Conserv., 2004, 115, 329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies B.R., Biggs J., Williams P.J., Whitfield M., Nicolet P., Davies B.R., et al., Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 2008, 125, 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madsen J.D., Chambers P.A., James W.F., Koch E.W., Westlake D.F., The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes, Hydrobiologia, 2001, 444, 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baatrup-Pedersen A., Szoszkiewicz K., Nijboer R., O’Hare M., Ferreira T., Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity, Hydrobiologia, 2006, 566, 179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riis T., Sand-Jensen K., Vestergaard O., Plant communities in lowland Danish streams: species composition and environmental factors, Aquatic Bot., 2000, 66, 255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Riis T., Sand-Jensen K., Larsen S.E., Plant distribution and abundance in relation to physical conditions and location within Danish stream systems, Hydrobiologia, 2001, 448, 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Westwood C.G., Teeuw R.M., Wade P.M., Holmes N.T.H., Guyard P., Influences of environmental conditions on macrophyte communities in droughtaffected headwater streams, River Res. Appl., 2006, 22, 703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhar U., Gregorc T., Renčelj M., Šraj-Kržič N., Gaberščik A., Distribution of macrophytes and condition of the physical environment of streams flowing through agricultural landscape in northeastern Slovenia, Limnologica, 2007, 37, 146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tremp H., Kampmann D., Schulz R., Factors shaping submerged bryophyte communities: A conceptual model for small mountain streams in Germany, Limnologica, 2012, 42, 242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedersen T.Ch.M., Baatrup-Pedersen A., Madsen T.V., Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams, Freshwater Biol., 2006, 51, 161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. WFD, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, European Commission, Brussels, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trémolières M., Carbiener R., Ortscheit A., Klein J.P., Changes in aquatic vegetation in Rhine floodplain streams in Alsace in relation to disturbance, J. Veg. Sci., 1994, 5, 169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sand-Jensen K., Riis T., Vestergaard O., Larsen S.E., Macrophyte decline in Danish lakes and streams over the past 100 years, J. Ecol., 2000, 88, 1030–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H., Gömöry D., Seasonal dynamics of macrophyte abundance in two regulated streams, Cent. Eur. J. Biol., 2009, 4, 241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baatrup-Pedersen A., Riis T., Macrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams, Freshwater Biol., 1999, 42, 375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H., Valachovič M., Paľove-Balang P., Kubinská A., Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia, Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 2010, 177, 115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen P.S., Toribara T.Y., Warner H., Microdetermination of phosphorus, Anal. Chem., 1956, 28, 1756–1758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reyment R.A., Jöreskog K.G., Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hirzel A.H., Hausser J., Chessel D., Perrin N., Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data, Ecology, 2002, 83, 2027–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SAS, SAS/STAT1 user’s guide, Release 6.03 Edition, SAS Institute, Cary, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  21. StatSoft, STATISTICA, System reference, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marhold K., Hindák F., (eds.), Checklists of nonvascular and vascular plant of Slovakia [Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska], Veda, Bratislava, 1998, (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grinberga L., Macrophyte species composition in streams of Latvia under different flow and substrate conditions, Estonian J. Ecol., 2011, 60, 194–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K., Verdonschot P.F.M., Assesment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrataes and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress, Freshwater Biol., 2006, 51, 1757–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lacoul P., Freedman B., Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems, Environ. Rev., 2006, 14, 89–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Borentte G., Puijalon S., Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review, Aquat. Sci., 2011, 73, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grinberga L., Environmental factors influencing the species diversity of macrophytes in middle-sized streams in Latvia, Hydrobiologia, 2010, 656, 233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Janauer G.A., Macrophyte inventory of the river Danube: A pilot study, Methods, In: Janauer G.A., Hale P., Sweeting R. (Eds.), Macrophyte inventory of the river Danube: A pilot study, Arch. Hydrobiol., 2003, Suppl. 147, Large Rivers, 14, 9–16

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Hrivnák.

About this article

Cite this article

Hrivnák, R., Oťheľová, H., Gömöry, D. et al. Environmental effects on species richness of macrophytes in Slovak streams. cent.eur.j.biol. 7, 1030–1036 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0090-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0090-8

Keywords

Navigation