Skip to main content
Log in

Fixing EMTALA: What's Wrong with the Patient Transfer Act

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Congress primarily enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) in 1986 to prevent the denial of care to uninsured patients in emergency departments. The final version of EMTALA lacks specific protection for indigent patients and saddles hospitals and physicians with more liability than Congress initially intended. Loopholes in the law allow denial of care to patients when temporarily stabilized. Congress should ameliorate these problems through amendment of the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiss, L., Martinez, J. Fixing EMTALA: What's Wrong with the Patient Transfer Act. J Public Health Pol 20, 335–347 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/3343405

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3343405

Navigation