Skip to main content
Log in

Role of UV Light in Photodamage, Skin Aging, and Skin Cancer

Importance of Photoprotection

  • Review Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar, and particularly UV, radiation causes molecular and cellular damage with resultant histopathologic and clinical degenerative changes, leading in turn to photosensitivity, photo-aging, and skin cancer. While our bodies have some natural UV defenses, additional protection from the sun is essential, including sun avoidance, physical protection, and sunscreen use. Sun avoidance includes limiting exposure during peak UV times (10am–4pm), avoiding UV-reflective surfaces such as sand, snow and water, and eliminating photosensitizing drugs. Physical protection includes wearing photoprotective clothing such as a broad-brimmed hat and long sleeves and use of UV-blocking films on windows. Sunscreen containing avobenzone, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide or encamsule should be used daily and frequently reapplied. To guard against the UVB spectrum, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are particularly recommended. Sunscreen is generally under-applied at only 25% of the recommended dose, seriously compromising photoprotection. Dosage guidelines recommend using more than half a teaspoon each on head and neck area and each arm, and more than a teaspoon each on anterior torso, posterior torso, and each leg (approximately 2 mg/cm2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aging. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Encyclopaedia Britannica 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9110653/aging [Accessed 2008 Jun 16]

  2. Vaziri H, Benchimol S. From telomere loss to p53 induction and activation of a DNA-damage pathway at senescence: the telomere loss/DNA damage model of cell aging. Exp Gerontol 1996; 31 (1-2): 295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kosmadaki MG, Gilchrest BA. The role of telomeres in skin aging/photoaging. Micron 2004; 35 (3): 155–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Svobodova A, Walterova D, Vostalova J. Ultraviolet light induced alteration to the skin. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2006; 150 (1): 25–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 354 (9180): 723–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection. Lancet 2007; 370 (9586): 528–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pathak MA. Sunscreens and their use in the preventive treatment of sunlight-induced skin damage. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987; 13 (7): 739–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung JH, Yano K, Lee MK, et al. Differential effects of photoaging vs intrinsic aging on the vascularization of human skin. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138 (11): 1437–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yaar M, Gilchrest BA. Aging of the skin. In: Freedberg IM, editor. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003: 1386–98

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka K, Hasegawa J, Asamitsu K, et al. Prevention of the ultraviolet B-mediated skin photoaging by a nuclear factor kappaB inhibitor, parthenolide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 315 (2): 624–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabe JH, Mamelak AJ, McElgunn PJ, et al. Photoaging: mechanisms and repair. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55 (1): 1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sander CS, Sercu S, Ziemer M, et al. Expression of extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) in human skin is decreased by age and increased upon ultraviolet exposure. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154 (2): 218–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Afaq F, Mukhtar H. Botanical antioxidants in the prevention of photocarcinogenesis and photoaging. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15 (9): 678–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berneburg M, Plettenberg H, Krutmann J. Photoaging of human skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2000; 16 (6): 239–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim HW, Naylor M, Honigsmann H, et al. American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Conference on UVA protection of sunscreens: summary and recommendations. Washington, DC, Feb 4, 2000. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44 (3): 505–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ortonne JP. From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146 Suppl. 61: 20–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinnell SR. Cutaneous photodamage, oxidative stress, and topical antioxidant protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48 (1): 1–19; quiz 20-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Gruijl FR, Van der Leun JC. Estimate of the wavelength dependency of ultraviolet carcinogenesis in humans and its relevance to the risk assessment of a stratospheric ozone depletion. Health Phys 1994; 67 (4): 319–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Draelos ZD. Topical treatments for benign photodamage. In: Goldberg DJ, editor. Photodamaged skin. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003: 145–74

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wulf HC, Stender IM, Lock-Andersen J. Sunscreens used at the beach do not protect against erythema: a new definition of SPF is proposed. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1997; 13 (4): 129–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider J. The teaspoon rule of applying sunscreen. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138 (6): 838–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diffey BL, Tanner PR, Matts PJ, et al. In vitro assessment of the broad-spectrum ultraviolet protection of sunscreen products. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43 (6): 1024–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D’Souza G, Evans GR. Mexoryl: a review of an ultraviolet A filter. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (4): 1071–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron ED, Stevens SR. Sunscreens and immune protection. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146 (6): 933–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Middelkamp-Hup MA, Pathak MA, Parrado C, et al. Oral Polypodium leucotomos extract decreases ultraviolet-induced damage of human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51 (6): 910–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez S, Pathak MA, Cuevas J, et al. Topical or oral administration with an extract of Polypodium leucotomos prevents acute sunburn and psoralen-induced phototoxic reactions as well as depletion of Langerhans cells in human skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1997; 13 (1-2): 50–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez S, Alonso-Lebrero JL, Del Rio R, et al. Polypodium leucotomos extract: a nutraceutical with photoprotective properties. Drugs Today (Barc) 2007; 43 (7): 475–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiseman H, Halliwell B. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem J 1996; 313 (Pt 1): 17–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Frieling UM, Schaumberg DA, Kupper TS, et al. A randomized, 12-year primary-prevention trial of beta carotene supplementation for nonmelanoma skin cancer in the physician’s health study. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136 (2): 179–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Reichrath J. Vitamin D and the skin: an ancient friend, revisited. Exp Dermatol 2007; 16 (7): 618–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69 (5): 842–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, et al. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84 (1): 18–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorham ED, Garland CF, Garland FC, et al. Optimal vitamin D status for colorectal cancer prevention: a quantitative meta analysis. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32 (3): 210–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuritzky LA, Finlay-Jones JJ, Hart PH. The controversial role of vitamin D in the skin: immunosuppression vs. photoprotection. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33 (2): 167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Holick MF. Sunlight “D”ilemma: risk of skin cancer or bone disease and muscle weakness. Lancet 2001; 357 (9249): 4–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Webb AR, Kline L, Holick MF. Influence of season and latitude on the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3: exposure to winter sunlight in Boston and Edmonton will not promote vitamin D3 synthesis in human skin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 67 (2): 373–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ting WW, Vest CD, Sontheimer R. Practical and experimental consideration of sun protection in dermatology. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42 (7): 505–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn R. Gonzaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzaga, E.R. Role of UV Light in Photodamage, Skin Aging, and Skin Cancer. AM J Clin Dermatol 10 (Suppl 1), 19–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/0128071-200910001-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/0128071-200910001-00004

Keywords

Navigation