Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to propose a statistical method for determining minimum detectable values in a pulse-counting measurements. The output of x-ray, electron and ion-spectroscopy detectors is a series of pulses that vary in their arrival frequency according to a Poisson distribution. The analysis presented here relates this to a Normal distribution, making it consistent with the standards and methodology recommended by IUPAC and in the ISO 11843 series of international standards. The theory and limitations of doing this are presented using two types of approximations: a Simple approximation and a Square Root approximation. The variance, critical values of the response variables, capability of detection criteria and the minimum detectable values are then defined. Finally, the validity of the approximations is checked using experimental data. It is concluded that the methodology is accurate enough for practical use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Kaiser, Spectrochim. Acta, 1947, 3, 40.
L. A. Currie and G. Svehla, Anal. Chem., 1968, 40, 586.
ACS Committee on Environmental Improvement, Anal. Chem., 1980, 52, 2242.
L. A. Currie and J. Res. NBS, 1985, 90, 409.
L. A. Currie and G. Svehla, Pure Appl. Chem., 1994, 66, 595.
L. A. Currie, Pure Appl. Chem., 1995, 67, 1699.
L. A. Currie, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1997, 37, 151.
ISO, “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”, 1995, ISBN 92-67-10188-9.
D. R. Baer, Surf. Interface Anal., 2007, 39, 283.
ISO TC ISO 11843-1 Capability of detection—Part 1: Terms and definitions (1997), ISO 11843-2 Capability of detection—Part 1 : Methodology in the non linear calibration case (2000), ISO 11843-3 Capability of detection—Part 3: Methodology for the determination of the critical value for the response variable when no calibration data are used (2003), ISO 11843-4 Capability of detection—Part 4: Methodology for comparing the minimum detectable value with a given value (2003), ISO 11843-5 Capability of detection—Part 5: Methodology in the non linear calibration case (2008).
D. C. Montgomery and G. C. Runger, “Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers”, 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
F. J. Anscomber, Biometrika, 1948, 35, 246.
K. Takeuchi and K. Fujino, “Binominal Distribution and Poisson Distribution”, 1981, Tokyo University Shuppan Kai.
N. L. Johnson and S. Kotz, “Discrete Distributions”, 1969, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
M. S. Bartlett, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1936, 3(Suppl.), 68.
G. W. Oehlert, The American Statistician, 1992, 46, 27.
M. F. Freeman and J. W. Tukey, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950, 21, 607.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furukawa, Y., Iwasaki, M. & Tanaka, A. A Practical Method for Determining Minimum Detectable Values in Pulse-Counting Measurements. ANAL. SCI. 26, 259–265 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.26.259
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.26.259