Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumor Burden Monitoring with Circulating Tumor DNA During Treatment in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To guide appropriate treatment strategy, an accurate tumor monitoring modality that reflects tumor burden during neoadjuvant treatment is required for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aimed to investigate the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy.

Patients and Methods

Longitudinally collected plasma samples for ctDNA combined with genomic DNA from primary lesions were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed ESCC who underwent NAC followed by subtotal esophagectomy. Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify mutations from the plasma and the primary tumor. The relationships between changes in ctDNA and the pathological response and recurrence were assessed in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Results

In pretreatment samples from 13 patients, multiple concordant mutations in ctDNA and primary tumors were observed in 11 patients (85%), who were classified as ctDNA positive before treatment. The ctDNA positive rate after NAC correlated with the pathological response (responders, 25%; nonresponders, 100%; p = 0.007). The risk of recurrence increased significantly in patients with positive ctDNA after surgery in analysis of 16 patients; the 1-year recurrence-free survival rates were 90 and 0% in ctDNA-negative and ctDNA-positive groups, respectively (p = 0.0008). In two patients with postoperative recurrence, ctDNA was detected approximately 5.5 months earlier than the diagnosis using radiographical imaging.

Conclusions

ctDNA is a promising biomarker for predicting pathological response and postoperative recurrence in ESCC. To demonstrate the external validity, we are currently preparing a multicenter prospective study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrandez Arenas A, Lanas AA. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in Western and Eastern countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7933–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Ando N, Kitagawa Y. Current advancement in multidisciplinary treatment for resectable cstage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14:37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kato K, Ito Y, Daiko H, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimen and chemoradiotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, JCOG1109 NExT study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:238–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuda S, Kitgawa Y, Takemura R, et al. Real-world evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant DCF over CF in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score matched analysis from 85 authorized institutes for esophageal cancer in Japan. Ann Surg In press. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noordman BJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashimoto T, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. The pattern of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and its clinical significance. Ann Surg. 2020;271:875–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuda S, Kawakubo H, Okamura A, et al. Distribution of residual disease and recurrence patterns in pathological responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2020;276(2):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oguma J, Ozawa S, Koyanagi K, et al. Prognostic significance of pathological tumor response and residual nodal metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Esophagus. 2019;16:395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katada C, Hara H, Fujii H, et al. A phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5–fluorouracil as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with resectable esophageal cancer (CROC trial). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:4027–4027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Corcoran RB, Chabner BA. Application of cell-free DNA analysis to cancer treatment. New Engl J Med. 2018;379:1754–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cescon DW, Bratman SV, Chan SM, Siu LL. Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy in oncology. Nat Cancer. 2020;1:276–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Azad TD, Chaudhuri AA, Fang P, et al. Circulating tumor DNA analysis for detection of minimal residual disease after chemoradiotherapy for localized esophageal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(494–505):e496.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nomura M, Goto M, Watanabe M, et al. Phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy of esophageal cancer: PIECE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:4038–4038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanda M, Koike M, Shimizu D, et al. Optimized cutoff value of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentration accurately predicts recurrence after curative resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1233–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th Edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:119–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Saotome K, Chiyoda T, Aimono E, et al. Clinical implications of next-generation sequencing-based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors. Cancer Med. 2020;9:7407–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Y, Ulrich BC, Supplee J, et al. False-positive plasma genotyping due to clonal hematopoiesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4437–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan HT, Chin YM, Nakamura Y, Low SK. Clonal hematopoiesis in liquid biopsy: from biological noise to valuable clinical implications. Cancers. 2020;12(8):2277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoenfeld D. The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika. 1981;68:316–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983;39:499–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuda S, Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection and thoracic duct resection for early-stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2020;107:705–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Einstein DJ, Liang N, Malhotra M, et al. Assessment of molecular remission in oligometastatic esophageal cancer with a personalized circulating tumor DNA assay. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Openshaw MR, Mohamed AA, Ottolini B, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumour DNA improves prognostication and relapse detection in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020;123:1271–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Egyud M, Tejani M, Pennathur A, et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in plasma: a potential biomarker for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:343–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ueda M, Iguchi T, Masuda T, et al. Somatic mutations in plasma cell-free DNA are diagnostic markers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma recurrence. Oncotarget. 2016;7:62280–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fujisawa R, Iwaya T, Endo F, et al. Early dynamics of circulating tumor DNA predict chemotherapy responses for patients with esophageal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42:1239–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Meng P, Wei J, Geng Y, et al. Targeted sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA in stage II-III resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:818.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarazona N, Henriksen TV, Carbonell-Asins JA, et al. Circulating tumor DNA to detect minimal residual disease, response to adjuvant therapy, and identify patients at high risk of recurrence in patients with stage I-III CRC. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4009–4009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JH, Long GV, Menzies AM, et al. Association between circulating tumor DNA and pseudoprogression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti–programmed cell death 1 antibodies. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:712–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Hiroshi Yamada and Emmy Yanagita, technicians at the Genomics units at Keio University School of Medicine, for their technical assistance in preparing the NGS library and sequencing; Michiru Sugimoto, a technician at the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help with the laboratory experiments; and Kumiko Motooka, a staff member at the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help in the manuscript preparation.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Matsuda MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Author Yuko Kitagawa is Editor in Chief of Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery and author Satoru Matsuda is Editor of Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery. Authors Yosuke Morimoto, Satoru Matsuda, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Kohei Nakamura, Ryota Kobayashi, Kazuhiko Hisaoka, Jun Okui, Masashi Takeuchi, Eriko Aimono, Kazumasa Fukuda, Rieko Nakamura, Hideyuki Saya, and Hiroshi Nishihara have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Author Yuko Kitagawa reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd.; Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Tsumura & Co.; Kyowa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd.; EA Pharma Co., Ltd.; Medicon Inc.; Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc.; Teijin Pharma Limited; Nihon Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; and Nippon Covidien Inc.; and personal fees from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation; AstraZeneca K.K.; Ethicon Inc.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc.; Olympus Corporation; Nippon Covidien Inc.; Shionogi & Co. Ltd.; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.; MSD K.K.; Smith & Nephew KK; Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; and ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. outside the submitted work.

Ethical Approval

Patients were recruited in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keio University School of Medicine (IRB no. 20190057). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morimoto, Y., Matsuda, S., Kawakubo, H. et al. Tumor Burden Monitoring with Circulating Tumor DNA During Treatment in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 3747–3756 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13194-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13194-z

Navigation