References
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multi-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379:1887–92.
Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 152–62.
Patel K, Abbassi O, Tang CB, et al. Completely minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junctional cancer: clinical and short-term oncological outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08826-7.
Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R et al. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open feasibility study and pilot trial). Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(48): 1–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Neither author has a conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ASO Author Reflections on the article “Completely Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Hybrid Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastro-Esophageal Junctional Cancer: Clinical and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes”. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08826-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, K., Jayanthi, N.V. ASO Author Reflections: Superior Postoperative Outcomes from Completely Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Hybrid Approach to Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastro-Esophageal Junctional Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 27 (Suppl 3), 828–829 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08838-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08838-3