Skip to main content
Log in

A Prospective Validation Study to Diagnose Serosal Invasion and Nodal Metastases of Gastric Cancer by Multidetector-row CT

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) may provide accurate preoperative staging of resectable gastric cancer. However, the standard methods and criteria to diagnose the T and N stages to select the patients who are good candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been established yet.

Methods

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of MDCT to diagnose the serosal invasion and nodal metastases of gastric cancer. Patients who had gastric adenocarcinoma underwent MDCT scanning using a standardized method. The T and N stage were diagnosed by prespecified criteria. The analyses were performed in the patients who had cN0–2 and M0 tumors and underwent curative gastrectomy as a primary treatment. The accuracy was calculated by comparing the results of MDCT with the histopathological findings.

Results

A total of 315 patients were analyzed. The overall diagnostic accuracy (95 % confidence interval) of T staging was 71.4 % (225 of 315, 66.2–76.1). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for serosal invasion were 85.7 % (81.4–89.1), 54.5 % (42.6–66.0), and 94.0 % (90.3–96.3), respectively. The false-positive rate for serosal invasion was 6.0 % (2.9–7.7). The overall diagnostic accuracy of N staging was 75.9 % (239 of 315, 70.9–80.3). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for nodal metastases were 81.3 % (76.6–85.2), 46.4 % (36.8–56.3), and 96.8 % (93.5–98.4), respectively. The false-positive rate for nodal metastases was 3.2 % (1.6–6.5 %).

Conclusions

These results suggest that MDCT provides an accurate diagnosis with high specificity and a low false-positive rate and can be used to select the patients who are candidates for preoperative chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM. International variation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6329–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nomura K. Cancer statistics in Japan, 2005. Tokyo: Foundation for Promotion Cancer Research; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:6–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, fluorouracil, and cytosine arabinoside followed by oral fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer. Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2282–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, et al. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology. 2005;236:879–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hur J, Park MS, Lee JH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:372–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, et al. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT—correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242:472–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaki Yoshikawa MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasegawa, S., Yoshikawa, T., Shirai, J. et al. A Prospective Validation Study to Diagnose Serosal Invasion and Nodal Metastases of Gastric Cancer by Multidetector-row CT. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 2016–2022 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2817-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2817-1

Keywords

Navigation