Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Marketing strategy and the internet: An organizing framework

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competitive strategy is primarily concerned with how a business should deploy resources at its disposal to achieve and maintain defensible competitive positional advantages in the marketplace. Competitive marketing strategy focuses on how a business should deploy marketing resources at its disposal to facilitate the achievement and maintenance of competitive positional advantages in the marketplace. In a growing number of product-markets, the competitive landscape has evolved from a predominantly physical marketplace to one encompassing both the physical and the electronic marketplace. This article presents a conceptual framework delineating the drivers and outcomes of marketing strategy in the context of competing in this broader, evolving marketplace. The proposed framework provides insights into changes in the nature and scope of marketing strategy; specific industry, product, buyer, and buying environment characteristics; and the unique skills and resources of the firm that assume added relevance in the context of competing in the evolving marketplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, Derek F. 1980.Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerlof, George. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Nabil and Yelena Yesha. 1996. “Strategic Directions in Electronic Commerce and Digital Libraries: Towards a Digital Agora.”ACM Computing Surveys 28 (4): 818–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, Joseph, John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer, and Stacy Wood. 1997. “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces.”Journal of Marketing 61 (July): 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, Joseph. 1956.Barriers to Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Yannis. 1991. “A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Market-places.”MIS Quarterly 15 (September): 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces.”Management Science 43 (December): 676–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, Sridhar, Vish V. Krishnan, and Mohanbir Sawhney. 2000. “New Offering Realization in the Networked Digital Environment.” InDigital Marketing. Eds. Vijay Mahajan and Jerry Wind. New York: John Wiley, 310–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1996.Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. and B. Konsynski. 1982. “Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems.”MIS Quarterly 6:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Robert and Rolf Wigand. 1995. “Electronic Markets and Virtual Chains on the Information Superhighway.”Sloan Management Review 36 (2): 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Paul D. and Nada I. Nasr. 1998. “Customer Lifetime Value: Marketing Models and Applications.”Journal of Interactive Marketing 12 (1): 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert C. and John Deighton. 1991. “Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability.”Sloan Management Review 33 (1): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, Erik and Abraham Seidmann. 1997. “A Call for Exploration: Introduction to Special Issue on Frontier Research on Information Systems and Economics.”Management Science 43 (12): 1605–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Raymond. 1996. “Virtual Shopping: Breakthrough in Marketing Research.”Harvard Business Review 74 (March/April): 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Do You See What I See? The Future of Virtual Shopping.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Fall): 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, Frances. 1997.The Death of Distance: How the Communication Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Clayton M. and Michael Overdorf. 2000. “Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change.”Harvard Business Review 78 (March–April): 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, David D. 1996. “Adding Service Discrimination to the Internet.”Telecommunications Policy 20 (3): 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, Michael R. and Edi Karni. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.”Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April): 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, Richard A. 1999. “Strategic Supremacy Through Disruption and Dominance.”Sloan Management Review 40 (3): 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Peter R. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationnality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (1): 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Alan G. Sawyer. 1990. “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers.”Journal of Consumer Research 54 (July): 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan. 1991. “Broadcasting Begins.” InCommunications in History: Technology, Culture, and Society. Eds. David Crowley and Paul Heyer. New York: Longman, 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, Nicholas and Frederick Flyer. 1998. “Compatibility and Market Structure for Network Goods.” Working Paper EC-98-02. Stern School of Business, New York University.

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?”Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Joseph and Garth Saloner. 1985. “Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation.”Rand Journal of Economics 16 (Spring): 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1986. “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation.”American Economic Review 76 (December): 940–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, Roger. 1997.Mediamorphosis: Understanding the New Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert H. and Philip J. Cook. 1995.The Winner-Take-All Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Rashi. 1991. “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, Raj, James A. Comer, and Raj Mehta. 2001. “An Investigation Into the Antecedents of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets.”Journal of Marketing 65 (July): 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil and Rabikar Chatterjee. 1997. “Consumer and Corporate Adoption of the World Wide Web as a Commercial Medium.” InElectronic Marketing and the Consumer. Ed. Robert A. Peterson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani, Vijay and Seungjin Whang. 1991. “The Impact of Information Systems on Organizations and Markets.”Communications of the ACM 34 (January): 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Ward. 1998. “The Original WWW: Web Lesson From the Early Days of Radio.”Journal of Interactive Marketing 12 (3): 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haubl, Gerald and Valerie Trifts. 2000. “Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids.”Marketing Science 19 (1): 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, Charles W. and Dan Schendel. 1978.Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations.”Journal of Marketing 60 (3): 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1997. “A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce.”Information Society 13 (1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.”Economic Journal 39:41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George P. 1990. “A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making.”Academy of Management Review 15:47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. 2000.A General Theory of Competition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Michael L. and Carl Shapiro. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.”The American Economic Review 75 (June): 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keep, William W., Stanley C. Hollander, and Roger Dickson. 1998. “Forces Impinging on Long-Term Business-to-Business Relationships in the United States: An Historical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 62 (2): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Benjamin and Keith B. Leffler. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.”Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 615–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore. 1981. “Marketing Intangible Products and Product Intangibles.”Harvard Business Review 59 (3): 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, John and Dan Ariely. 2000. “Wine Online: Search Costs and Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution.”Marketing Science 19 (1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Thomas W. 1997. “Is Empowerment Just a Fad? Control, Decision Making, and IT.”Sloan Management Review 38 (2): 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, JoAnne Yates, and Robert I. Benjamin. 1989. “The Logic of Electronic Markets.”Harvard Business Review 67 (May/June): 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate and Thomas P. Hughes. 1988.The Development of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Philip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 78 (March/April): 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Jim R. 1996. “A Machine-Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce.”Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (3): 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppers, Don, Martha Rogers, and Bob Dorf. 1999. “Is Your Company Ready for One-to-One Marketing?”Harvard Business Review 77 (January/February) 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A., Sridhar Balasubramanian, and Bart J. Bronnenberg. 1997. “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Fall): 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 2001. “Strategy and the Internet.”Harvard Business Review 79 (3): 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Victor E. Millar. 1985. “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage.”Harvard Business Review 63 (July–August): 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation.”Harvard Business Review 68 (May–June): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Akshay R. and Mark E. Bergen. 1992. “Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers’ Lack of Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayport, Jeffrey F. and John J. Sviokla. 1994. “Managing in the Marketspace.”Harvard Business Review 72 (November/December): 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, Steven C. and Joseph Stiglitz. 1977. “Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolitically Competitive Price Dispersion.”Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (December): 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Carl and Hal R. Varian. 1999.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostack, g. Lynn. 1977. “Breaking Free From Product Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 41 (April): 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, Indrajit. 2000. “Cost Transparency: The Net’s Real Threat to Prices and Brands.”Harvard Business Review 78 (March-April): 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, Jonathan. 1992. “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimension Determine Telepresence.”Journal of Communication 42 (Autumn): 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J.. 1961. “The Economics of Information.”Journal of Political Economy 69 (June): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, Don. 1996.Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.”Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, Joel. 1986. “An Experimental Examination of the Economics of Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September): 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Peter R. Dickson, and William L. Wilkie. 1989. “Buyer Uncertainty and Information Search.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (September): 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr. and Yoram Wind. 1972.Organizational Buying Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, Peter and Marianne Broadbent. 1998.Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, Manjit S. and Rajan Varadarajan. 2001. “Interactivity in the Electronic Marketplace: An Exposition of the Concept and Its Implications for Product Migration.” Working Paper. Department of Marketing, Texas A&M University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M University, Texas, USA

    P. Rajan Varadarajan & Manjit S. Yadav

Authors
  1. P. Rajan Varadarajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manjit S. Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

P. Rajan Varadarajan is a distinguished professor of marketing and the Ford chair in marketing and e-commerce in the Mays Business School at Texas A&M University. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of strategy and e-commerce. His research on corporate, business, and marketing strategyrelated issues has been published in theJournal of Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and other leading journals. He is coauthor of a textbook titledContemporary Perspectives on Strategic Market Planning. Dr. Varadarajan served as editor of theJournal of Marketing from 1993 to 1996. He currently serves on the Board of Governors of the Academy of Marketing Science and as editor of theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

Manjit S. Yadav is an associate professor of marketing and Mays Faculty Fellow, Department of Marketing, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University. He obtained his Ph.D. in marketing from Virginia Tech. His research focuses on electronic commerce, firms’ pricing strategies, and consumers’ price perceptions. He has published in a number of journals, includingJournal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, andSloan Management Review. He is a member of the Editorial Review Board of theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science. At Texas A&M, Dr. Yadav developed and currently teaches a graduate course (Strategic Foundations of E-Commerce) dealing with the strategic challenges and opportunities in the emerging electronic marketplace. He served as cochair of the American Marketing Association’s 2001 Faculty Consortium on Electronic Commerce held at Texas A&M University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varadarajan, P.R., Yadav, M.S. Marketing strategy and the internet: An organizing framework. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 30, 296–312 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236907

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236907

Keywords

Search

Navigation