A numerical test of differential equations for one- and two-loop sunrise diagrams using configuration space techniques

We use configuration space methods to write down one-dimensional integral representations for one- and two-loop sunrise diagrams (also called Bessel moments) which we use to numerically check on the correctness of the second order differential equations for one- and two-loop sunrise diagrams that have recently been discussed in the literature.


Introduction
Sunrise-type diagrams have been under investigation since many years. Exact analytical results can be obtained only for special mass or kinematic configurations such as for the equal or zero mass cases or for the threshold region. For example, threshold expansions of the non-degenerate massive two-loop sunrise diagram have been studied in Refs. [1,2]. The construction of differential equations for the corresponding correlator function provides some hope that by solving these differential equations, a general analytical solution can be obtained. Recently, mathematical methods were used to construct the coefficients of such a differential equation in a systematic way [3]. This work supplements the work of Kotikov [4] and Remiddi et al. [5,6,7] on the same subject. While traditionally the correlator is calculated in momentum space, configuration space techniques allow for a surprisingly simple solution for sunrise-type diagrams: The correlator in configuration space is just a product of single propagators which in turn can be expressed by modified Bessel functions of the second kind. Transforming back to momentum space, one ends up with a onedimensional integral over Bessel functions, known as Bessel moments [8,9]. As outlined in a series of papers [10,11,12,13,2,14,15,16], the corresponding one-dimensional integral can be easily integrated numerically for an arbitrary number of propagators with different masses in any space-time dimension. Therefore, configuration space techniques can be used to numerically check the differential equations for the correlator function obtained by other means. This will be detailed in this note.
The paper is organized as follows: In Sec. 2 we introduce the configuration space techniques which will be used in Sec. 3 to check the differential equations for one-loop sunrise-type diagrams. In Sec. 4 we check the differential equations for the two-loop sunrise diagrams for the equal mass case, while in Sec. 5 we will deal with nondegenerate masses.
Our conclusions can be found in Sec. 6. Even though the configuration space techniques are well suited to treat general D = 4 space-time dimensions, we will mainly deal with the case of D = 2 space-time dimensions in this paper. For reasons of simplicity, throughout this paper we work in the Euclidean domain. The transition to the Minkowskian domain can be obtained as usual by a Wick rotation (or, equivalently, by replacing p 2 → −p 2 ).

Configuration space techniques
In configuration space, the n-loop n-particle irreducible correlation function connecting the space-time points 0 and x is given by the product of the propagators, where the free propagator of a particle with mass m in D-dimensional (Euclidean) spacetime is given by In the limit mx → 0 at fixed x, the propagator simplifies to where Γ(λ) is Euler's Gamma function.
In this note we write the n-particle irreducible correlator function in (Euclidean) momentum space. The momentum space n-particle irreducible correlator function is given by the Fourier transform of the n-particle irreducible correlator function Π(x) in configuration As a product of propagators, Π(x) in (5) depends only on the absolute value x = √ x µ x µ , Therefore, one proceeds by first integrating the exponential factor over the D − 1 dimen- integration measure over the D − 1 dimensional hypersphere. The integration of the exponential factor over the unit sphere gives J λ (z) is the Bessel function of the first kind. As before, p and x on the right hand side of Eq. (6) stand for the absolute values p = √ p µ p µ and x = √ x µ x µ . Therefore, the correlator in momentum space depends only on the absolute value of the momentum, This is the central formula for our numerical verification of the correctness of the differential equations.

The one-loop case
In Ref. [5], Remiddi explains how to obtain the differential equation for the one-loop sunrisetype diagram with arbitrary masses and dimensions. By applying the integration-by-parts technique to the correlator in momentum space, recurrence relations can be obtained.
Finally, Euler's theorem for homogeneous functions connects the loose ends of the iterative steps involving partial derivative with respect to p 2 . We have numerically checked all these steps and have found numerical consistency -up to Stokes' contributions due to surface terms in integer space-times dimensions.
To be more precise, the integral for v = k, p (or a linear combination of both) leads to a surface term which can be assumed to vanish (up to Stokes' contributions). The integration-by-parts technique consists in calculating the integral explicitly and one then expresses the result in terms of scalar The (two) resulting recurrence relations read Eq. (11) can be replaced by Eq. (10) with the two lines interchanged, It is obvious that Eq. (11) is reproduced as difference of Eq. (10) and Eq. (12). Therefore, one has to check only Eq. (10). We will perform this numerical check for the parameter choice α 1 = α 2 = 1 which is relevant for the differential equation, and for D = 2 spacetime dimensions. As mentioned in Ref. [3], even though other dimensions are feasible, this choice avoids singular contributions and serves for the simplest integrand. The equation to be checked is Starting from the integrals S(α 1 , α 2 ) with higher (integer) values of α i can be obtained as partial derivatives with respect to the masses, and accordingly −1 In addition one has (17) The derivative can be expressed by K ′ 0 (z) = −K 1 (z). The higher order integrals in the configuration space representation are given by Therefore, Eq. (13) in the configuration space representation reads We Euler's theorem of homogeneous functions leads to the differential equation Because of J ′ 0 (z) = −J 1 (z), Eq. (20) can be translated to We checked on the latter relation with an even better precision of the order of 10 −13 .
The differential equation in Ref. [5] is obtained by inserting the recurrence relations into Euler's differential equation (20). Using the configuration space representation, Eq. (22) reads This equation could be checked with a precision of the order of 10 −8 While Euler's differential equation can be derived from general principles also for the configuration space representation, the recurrence relations can be derived only via the momentum space representation. If one does not use this technique, it remains unclear why such integral identities exist for general parameters p, m 1 and m 2 . In order to check whether one can derive further relations by using integral identities in configuration space, we have used the general ansatz where a is an arbitrary parameter. This leads to Eq. (19) and which is the difference of Eq. (19) and the same equation with m 1 and m 2 interchanged.
We conclude that no more recurrence relations can be found that go beyond Eq. (19).
These results have been checked with a precision of the order of 10 −8 .