Coupled-channel description for mirror mass-11 nuclei compared to shell-model structures

The spectra of mass-11 nuclei are unusual, and so pose a challenge for theoretical models of their structure. The set of isobars range from being well bound to nucleon emission (11B,11C) through weakly bound (11Li, 11Be), with the former taking the form of a two neutron halo, to being proton unstable (11N,11O). A self-consistent approach to understand this set of nuclei is especially important as the mirror pair 11Be-11N exhibit a parity-inverted ground state compared to their neighbouring nuclei. Herein the Multi-Channel Algebraic Scattering (MCAS) method has been used to describe the low excitation spectra of those isobars in terms of nucleon-nucleus clusters. A collective model description of the low-excitation states of the mass-10 core nuclei has been used to form the coupled-channel interactions required in the method. For comparison, and to understand the underlying configurations, a shell model approach has been used to obtain those spectra with no-core (0+2+4)hw and (0+2)hw shell-model spaces for the mass 10 and mass 11 nuclei respectively.The results of the calculations suggest the need of a strong coupling in the collective coupled-channel vibrational model. In particular, the strong coupling of the collective 2+_1 state of 10Be to the valence neutron plays a decisive role in forming the positive parity ground state in11Be.


Introduction
The set of mass-11 isobars, from 11 Li to 11 O and encompassing three mirror pairs, span the region from the proton to the neutron drip lines, with 11 N and 11 O being beyond the proton drip line. A systematic study of this system is of interest given the change in isospin from one end of the range to the other, but also given that the mirror pair 11 Be and 11 N have ground states of positive parity, opposite to those of the other nuclei in the system. That has been the subject of extensive studies (see, for example, Refs. [1,2,3]), as 11 Be is also considered to be a single-neutron halo. While the determination of the nature of the positive-parity ground states is of interest, it is important to understand those ground states also with regards to the neighbouring mass-11 nuclei. In that context, a self-consistent many-body interpretation across the mass-11 isobars is necessary. In so doing, it becomes necessary to understand the nature of the ground state of 11 Be beyond the extreme single-particle picture as is suggested by the halo, which would require that its ground state wave function has significant neutron occupancy in the 1s 1/2 orbit. These mass-11 nuclei have quite diverse nucleon emission thresholds as is shown in Table 1. They range from 22.39 to −1.49 MeV. Recently [4], an observation of the unbound 11 O was made and of its decay by two proton emission. Describing the spectra of such a set of oddmass nuclei self-consistently presents a challenge. Herein we compare spectra found using a coupled-channel description for the mirror mass-11 nuclei with results from complete-space shell-model calculations. We have used the coupled-channel approach [5] that, previously, was taken to similarly analyse the spectra of the full set of mass-7 isobars [6].
Those analyses assumed two types of coupling: ones involving two clusters of composite nuclei (mass-3 and mass-4) for only a single channel, and the other, coupling of nucleons to low-lying states in 6 He and 6 Be. For the former, the assumption of only a single channel contributing to the spectrum is adequate given that there are no excited states in the core nuclei, save for the resonances above 20 MeV in 4 He [7], which do not affect the low-lying spectra of the compound.
* In [6] a proton separation threshold of −1.54 MeV was suggested for 11 N.
third mirror pair, 11 Li-11 O, and their underlying mass-10 cores for the method to be used with any confidence. We seek to establish the extent to which a nearly-uniform interaction may account for the spectra of four of these isobars. For these cases, we treat the mirror pairs as the coupling of a nucleon with the appropriate mass-10 core, which is described by a collective model (either vibrational or rotational). The method we use solves the coupled-channel problems of two-cluster systems, usually nucleon-nucleus, algebraically. The coupling interactions in this approach have been formed using a number of low excitation states of the core nuclei. In those coupled-channel calculations, the basic nucleon-nucleus interaction used has the form in which the Woods-Saxon (WS) function, has been used. The vector operators l and s denote orbital and nucleon intrinsic spin, and V 0 , V ll , V ls are potentialstrength parameters. R 0 is nuclear radius and a 0 is the diffusivity. All details of the approach, first used in [5], and a collection of the results of applications made to date are given in ref. [9]. The Pauli principle is taken into account in this method by adding orthogonalizing pseudo-potentials (OPP) to the nucleon-nucleus potentials chosen for the cluster coupledchannels interactions in the defining Hamiltonian for the cluster [10]. The OPP are formed as nonlocal separable products of bound single nucleon wave functions in the chosen nucleon-nucleus potentials. Thus the interaction matrix of potentials used has the non-local form, (2) in which V cc ′ are the collective-model derived nuclear potentials, A c (r) is the radial part of the single particle wave function in channel c, determined by solving the radial Schrödinger equation, and λ is a scaling energy. A sufficiently large value for these energy parameters (about 10 6 MeV) implies that completely-occupied nucleon subshells in the target become inaccessible to occupancy by a projectile nucleon. Smaller non-zero values lead to a Paulihindrance effect involving a partially occupied sub-shell, as has been extensively discussed [9,11,12]. Pauli-allowed states imply the scaling parameter being set to zero.
For completeness, we have also evaluated the spectra of some of the mass-10 and mass-11 isobars of relevance using a complete space, no-core, shell model. For mass-10 we have used a (0+2+4) ω shell model while for mass-11 a no-core (0 + 2) ω shell model was used. Use of the smaller basis model for the odd-mass nuclei was due to the much larger matrices involved in using the (0+2+4) ω model for mass-11 nuclei rendering those calculations impractical. In all cases, the OXBASH shell-model program [13] was used. The results are free of any spurious center of mass effects since the bases are complete.
Results are presented in two sections. In Sect. 2 we consider the structure of three sets of mass-11 mirror pairs as found using MCAS to solve coupled-channel cluster systems. Results of using this approach are given in three subsections. In Sect. 3, spectra of the mass 10 and 11 isobars that we have found using no-core shell models are presented and discussed. Conclusions are given in Sect. 4.

Mass-11 isobars as cluster systems
The MCAS method has been used to solve couple-channel equations to give low-energy spectra of a set of mass-11 isobars. These systems are described by the effective coupling of a nucleon to a 10 Be, a 10 B, or a 10 C core. The interactions for the channel couplings were defined using collective models for the core nuclei. The spectra for the mirror pair 10 Be and 10 C exhibit structures somewhat consistent with a vibrational model (being a 0 + ground state, followed by almost-equal spacings to a 2 + excited state and then a near-degenerate triplet). However, given the lack of knowledge of the spectrum of 10 C, we restrict the couplings to involve the first four states in each only. The low-lying spectrum of 10 B does not show features consistent with a vibrational model. We use the lowest six states of 10 B to define the nucleon-nucleus channel couplings in a rotational model.
Results from those calculations are presented and discussed in the following three subsections for the mirror systems 11 C (described as the coupling of a neutron to 10 C) and 11 B (p+ 10 Be); 11 N (p+ 10 C) and 11 Be (n+ 10 Be); and, 11 C (p + 10 B) and 11 B (n + 10 B), sequentially.

The mirror systems, 11 C and 11 B
Initially, we consider 11 C and 11 B as modelled by couplings of the clusters n+ 10 C and p+ 10 Be, respectively. The spectra of these mirror systems have many bound states given the relevant emission thresholds as shown in Table 1. In our case, using the coupled-channel approach, good results have been found assuming a vibration collective model and for the relevant nucleon interactions, with the low-lying states of 10 C and 10 Be. We have used the four known positive states to ∼ 6 MeV excitation in each core nucleus. For the vibrational model, the assumed target states are: the ground states (0 + ), which are taken as the  (2) and (3) that have been used in our coupled-channel evaluations of the 11 C (as n+ 10 C) and 11 B (as p+ 10 Be) spectra. Strengths are in MeV, geometry radii and diffusivities are in fm. Table 3. OPP strengths for relevant nucleon interactions with states in 10 C ( 10 Be). All energies [8] are in MeV and those for the mass-10 states are the experimental ones.
The parameter values defining the interactions are listed in Table 2. Therein, all energies are in MeV and the radii and diffusivities are in fm. It should be noted that in Table 2 the geometric Coulomb parameters are constrained by analyses of the charge densities of the cores [14] as given by a three-parameter Fermi distribution function 3pF [9], namely ρ ch (r) = 1 + w c r 2 /R 2 In calculations, the parameters, radius, R c , diffuseness a c , and scaling parameter w c , are chosen to give the rms Coulomb charge radius listed in Ref. [14]. The OPP, λ (I) nlj , required for those interactions with states in the mass-10 core nuclei are listed in Table 3.
In Fig. 1, the results found for the low excitation spectra of 11 C and 11 B are compared with the known spectra [8]. Good agreement is evident over almost 10 MeV in excitation. As good an agreement has been found with the same Hamiltonian plus a Coulomb interaction, when used in calculating the 11 B spectrum.
Our calculated results reproduce the observed nucleon separation energies, find the proper sequence of low excitation negative parity states (energy gaps and spins) and give the known excitation energies of the first positive parity excited states.

2.2
The mirror systems, 11 Be and 11 N We have described 11 N and 11 Be by the coupling of the clusters p+ 10 C and n+ 10 Be, respectively. They pose very different problems for evaluation to those of the 11 C and 11 B mirrors. Largely those different problems relate to  Table 4. The parameter values used in the coupled-channel evaluations of the 11 N (as p+ 10 C) and 11 Be (as n+ 10 Be) spectra. Strengths are in MeV, radii and diffusivities are in Fermi.
Be being weakly bound while 11 N is unbound as is indicated by the relevant nucleon thresholds listed in Table 1. Further, both ground states (a resonance in the case of 11 N) have assigned spin-parities of 1 2 + .
Our coupled-channel calculations for the spectra of 11 N and 11 Be used the parameter values for the interactions that are listed in Table 4, with a deformation parameter β 2 = −0.83. While most of these parameter values are similar to those given in Table 2 for the 11 C and 11 B cases, the values of the central strengths are ∼ 30% smaller. This change in the central potential strength reflects the changed number of like nucleon versus unlike nucleon interactions between the nucleons in each mass-10 core with the added nucleon forming the clusters.
The OPP strengths needed in these cases also differ from the values for the clusters due to the changed numbers of like nucleons (to the external one) in the core nuclei. In particular, in the current configurations, the two ground states have the 0p 3 2 orbits fully occupied. The OPP strengths required to obtain the low excitation spectra of 11 N and 11 Be are listed in Table 5; with that of the 0p 1 2 orbit in the ground state of 10 Be being slightly larger to give the observed excitation energies of the 1 2 − | 1 states. For optimal results in these two cases, slightly differing central potentials of strength of −42.2 and −41.8 MeV and diffusivities of 0.625 and 0.7 fm. have been used to get the spectra of 11 Be and 11 N respectively. The need of these small adjustments for mirror conditions, in this case, is not surprising given the small differences in spectral properties of the two mass-10 core nuclei as well as the simplistic collective model used to describe the coupling interactions between the nucleon and the four states of those core nuclei chosen for the coupled-channel calculations.
As shown in Fig. 2, our coupled-channel calculations gave the nucleon separation energies and the approximate energies and spin-parities of many of the known spectral states in the low excitation spectra. But there are calculated levels that are not observed and known levels that are not matched in this (and higher) excitation energy range. Possibly there is a state at 3.06 MeV in the spectrum of 11 N [8] that is not found in the calculation. But there has not been any spin-parity assigned to it in the tabulations. Properties of the spectra are listed in Table 6. Therein the experimental energies and widths of known states in the low excitation spectra of 11 Be and 11 N are compared. Those spectral levels are displayed also in Fig. 2, from which it is evident that, in the low energy excitation range, the calculated excitation energies agree well overall with observation.  These calculations involve very strong coupling, as evidenced by the value of β 2 = −0.83. Varying that value has a drastic effect, with a small decrease resulting in a significant raising of the centroid energy of the 1 2 + resonance for it to no longer be the ground state of 11 N. On the other hand a small increase makes the 1 2 + ground state centroid decrease in energy. At the same time the width of that ground state resonance also decreases and a value of 800 keV can be found, in agreement with that listed [8]. But then, on weakening the central potential strength to recover the wanted centroid energy of 1.49 MeV, the width increases back to over 3 MeV.
Allowing the chosen states of the core nucleus, 10 C, to be orthonormal admixtures including two quadrupole phonon components, also can give a 1 2 + ground state resonance for 11 N with a width of ∼ 800 keV. But then the centroid energy lies between 0.8 and 1.0 MeV. Again, weakening the central potential strengths to place that centroid at 1.49 MeV leads to an increase in those widths to between 3 and 4 MeV.
In Fig. 3, we show how the strong coupling, particularly to the 2 + 1 state of the core, 10 Be, leads to the ground state in 11 Be having a spin-parity 1 2 + . Therein the low excitation known spectrum of 11 Be is compared to the full coupled-channel result, as displayed previously in Fig. 2, and here labelled as "MCAS 4" with the numeral being the number of states of 10 Be used in forming the coupled-channel interaction matrix of potentials, to wit the ground 0 + , and the 2 + 1 , 2 + 2 and 0 + 2 in sequence. The adjacent columns show the spectra formed with just the first three of those ("MCAS 3"), with only the ground and 2 + 1 ("MCAS 2"), and as a single channel, ground state, calculation ("MCAS 1"). Crucially all other details involved in these calculations were unchanged. Clearly the major spectral change with the evaluated ground state being a 1 2 + level arises from the coupling involving the 2 + 1 state but the other terms play important roles in adjusting evaluated energies downward with improvement of the energy gaps in the low lying 11 Be spectrum. Notably, the shell model calculations presented in Section 3.2, Table 9, also indicate this large contribution of the 2 + 1 state.

2.3
The mirror systems, 11 C and 11 B, with 10 B as core Treating these nuclei as the clusters of a proton and of a neutron on the core nucleus, 10 B, is a major problem. First the low energy spectrum of 10 B does not readily map to any simple collective model of structure with its ground state spin-parity of 3 + being a challenge to be found even in larger space shell-model studies (see below). The six lowest lying states in 10 B have the spin-parity sequence 3 + 1 , 1 + 1 , 0 + , 1 + 2 , 2 + and 3 + 2 ; a sequence which is not easily identifiable with collective structure. Thus, a simple rotation scheme with solely a quadrupole coupling  Table 7.
The OPP strengths needed to achieve the final results are listed in Table 8. These values reflect underlying nucleon shell occupancies disparate to those in the core nuclei of the other clusters considered. Most notably we need to have some inner core (0s-shell) breaking with the monopole. This breaking is essential to get the known

Shell-model study of mass-10 and mass-11 isobars
As a comparison to the spectra for the mass-11 pairs obtained from the coupled-channel evaluations, alternate spectra were obtained using the shell model. For the mass-10 nuclei, a complete (0 + 2 + 4) ω shell-model calculation was performed using the Zheng G-matrix interaction [15]. For the mass-11 systems, the Millener-Kurath interaction [16] was used in a complete (0 + 2) ω model space. The positive parity states of 11 Be and 11 N were obtained in a (1 + 3) ω model space. The OXBASH shell-model program [13] was used to obtain both the wave functions and spectra.

Mass 10 isobars
In Figs. 5 and 6 the low-energy spectra for 10 B and the mirror pair 10 Be-10 C are shown, respectively. Therein, the results of the shell-model calculations are compared to the known spectra [17].
The nucleus 10 B is a special case, being one of the few light odd-odd mass nuclei. Its ground state has a spinparity of 3 + which presents a problem for shell-model descriptions. It is not a simple matter of the coupling of the odd 0p 3/2 proton to the odd 0p 3/2 neutron. The result from the (0 + 2 + 4) ω shell model gives a ground state of 1 + , but with a binding energy only 319 keV below that of the predicted 3 + 1 state. The wave functions of those states are, as given by the shell-model calculation: A closed 0s 1/2 shell forms part of each component listed in Eqs. (5). Other configurations not explicitly given in Eqs. (5) are ∼ 1% or less, leading to both wave functions being ∼ 70% 0 ω with the rest of the wave functions formed from higher order ω components. There is significant occupation of the 0p 1/2 orbit in both wave functions, while a dominant (0p 3/2 ) 6 component is only in the wave function for the 3 + 1 state. While a 1 + ground state is favored in such a model, as is suggested by the dominant configurations involving the 0p 1/2 orbit in each wave function, the small excitation energy of the 3 + state encourages the idea that a small change in the shell-model interaction matrix elements could invert the levels for the 3 + to be the ground state. This problem has Fig. 6. Low-energy spectra of the mirror pair 10 Be and 10 C. The data [17] are compared to the results of the shell-model calculation as described in the text. also been considered using other shell models, such as by those classified as ab initio [18,19]. Both of these studies consider very large basis spaces but do not account for all possible states contained therein. Thus the spaces are incomplete and so require adjusting methods, such as that of the projection method of Gloeckner and Lawson [20], to account for spurious center of mass motion. Nonetheless, both studies obtained good spectra and electromagnetic properties of the systems studied, for the mass-10 isobars [18] and for the isotopes of Boron [19]. The first of these [18] used the CD-Bonn and Argonne realistic N N interactions, but in the case of 10 B, even allowing changes in the oscillator energy defining the single particle states, still gave a 1 + ground state. They considered that as an indication of the need for true three-body forces to describe the low-lying structure in complex nuclei. That was considered in the more recent study [19] and found to be the case but reproduced using one of the set of starting N N interactions, the INOY NN interaction.
In our (0 + 2 + 4) ω calculation, the dominant component of the 0 + 1 state in 10 B is 70% 0s 1/2 4 0p 3/2 6 , suggesting a closed 0s core. However, the occupation number is 1.9 for both the protons and neutrons in the 0s shell; an effect of the other 30% of the wave function which contains either an open 0s 1/2 shell and/or occupancy in the 0d1s shell. Such result provides a microscopic justification of a small OPP strength parameter for for the 0 + 1 level of the 10 B system, as reported in Table 8.
The low-energy spectra for the mirror nuclei 10 Be and 10 C are shown in Fig. 6, with the result of the calculation using the (0 + 2 + 4) ω shell model. The spectra are reasonably well reproduced, reflecting the mirror symmetry, although there is not much experimental information about the spectrum of 10 C. The first excited 0 + state in 10 Be is predicted to be at 10.779 MeV, well above the measured energy. The wave function of this particular 0 + state is By comparison, the energy of that state is predicted to be between 9.51 MeV and 9.78 MeV in the model of Caurier et al. [18], and is also largely a 0 ω state. However, this 0 + state, at 6.179 MeV, is considered to be predominantly 2 ω in nature [21].

Mass 11 isobars
The spectra of the mass-11 isobars of interest, the mirror pairs 11 B/ 11 C and 11 Be/ 11 N, have been obtained from MCAS evaluations as shown in Figs. 1, 2, and 4. The mirror pair 11 Li/ 11 O presents a different problem for the shell model, given the very loose binding of 11 Li (the two neutron separation energy is 369.1 keV while the single neutron separation energy is 395.5 keV [8]), and 11 O is unbound. The spectra of these nuclei of interest have also been obtained using a (0 + 2) ω shell model. In the instances where odd-parity states are required, the state have been obtained in a (1 + 3) ω model. The MK3W interaction of Warburton and Millener [16], a modification of the earlier shell-model interaction of Millener and Kurath, was used. The low-energy spectra for the mirror pair 11 B/ 11 C is shown in Fig. 7. Therein, the results of the (0 + 2) ω shell model calculation agree reasonably well with the measured spectra, with the exception of the 5 2 + state at 7.29 MeV in 11 B and 6.91 MeV in 11 C. The prevalence of negative parity states in this region of excitation of both these nuclei would indicate the need for larger shell-model spaces and the inclusion of higher ω components. Fig. 8 displays the low-energy spectra for the mirror pair 11 Be/ 11 N. Not much is known of the spectrum of 11 N, but the spectrum of 11 Be is well-established as a result of measurements of the β-decay of 11 Li [8]. The presence of the 1 2 + ground state in both 11 Be and 11 N presents a problem for the shell model. The result of the (0 + 2) ω shell-model calculation using the MK3W interaction predicts a 1 2 − ground state, with the 1 2 + state 320 keV above it. For comparison, we have also performed a calculation in the same model space using the WBT interaction of Warburton and Brown [22]. It gives the   The data [8] are compared to the results of the shell-model calculations made in a (0 + 2) ω model space using the MK3W [16] and WBT [22] shell-model interactions.
with the breakdown in ω being The configurations involving a nucleon in the 1s orbit account for 73.85% of the total wave function within which the occupation numbers for the 1s 1/2 orbit are 0.787 for neutrons and 0.006 for protons. These components may be viewed as forming a 1s neutron halo in 11 Be, but there is a substantial component (26.15%) that has no 1s 1/2 involvement. Strong configuration mixing is suggested by Eq. (7); a result enhanced with the shell model calculations made using the MK3W interaction from which configurations involving the 1s 1/2 orbit account for only 49.48% of the total wave function. The relevant couplings of the valence neutron to states in 10 Be forming the ground state in 11 Be may also be obtained from the shell model calculation. The spectroscopic amplitudes for forming the ground state of 11 Be as obtained from the shell model calculations using the WBT and MK3W interactions are given in Table 9. The results of the shell model calculations show strong coupling of the neutron not only to the ground state of 10 Be but also to the 2 + 1 state. In the case of the WBT shell model calculation the coupling to the 2 + state is almost purely from the neutron occupying the 0d 5/2 orbit. The MK3W result, however, indicates an additional coupling via the neutron occupying the 0d 3/2 orbit. The spectroscopic amplitude in that case is of opposite sign, indicating an overall weaker coupling to the 2 + state in the model. This indication of a strong coupling to the ground and 2 + states supports the necessity of such coupling in the MCAS calculation (cf. Table 4).
As with the ground state of 10 B, a small change in the matrix elements in both the MK3W and WBT interactions may give the correct inversion with the correct energy separation. Note that the states in 11 Be were not used in the determination of the WBT interaction [22].
The spectrum obtained using the WBT interaction also confirms the results obtained in Ref. [1]. Therein, the authors note that it is possible for a shell model to reproduce the parity inversion in 11 Be, but also ascribe the inversion to the coupling of the valence neutron to the 2 + state in the 10 Be core. This supports the inclusion of that state as part of the target spectrum used in our coupled-channel calculations of 11 Be and 11 N. Though less is known about the resonance states in 11 N, while being indicative of some mirror symmetry with 11 Be, the results of the shell-model calculations show tentative agreement with some of the known spin-parities of those resonances in the spectrum.
The parity inversion (of the ground and first excited states) observed in both 11 Be and 11 N has also been the subject of other shell model studies [1,2]; the latter of which noted that the effects of quadrupole core excitation and pairing are important to find the parity inversion in 11 Be. The former however performed essentially a traditional microscopic calculation but over many shells, and with their optimised interaction for the chosen model space, found the desired inversion.

Conclusions
The low-energy spectra of four mass-11 nuclei ( 11 Be, 11 B, 11 C, and 11 N) have been evaluated, initially, by using the multi-channel algebraic scattering approach treating the nuclei as the coupling of a nucleon with states of a mass-10 nuclear core. Coupled-channel Hamiltonians were formed assuming a collective model of the nuclear cores and of their interactions with the extra-core nucleon. A vibration model was used to specify the target states of 10 Be and 10 C as their low excitation spectra have the essential sequence of states for that description. Mirror symmetries were assumed and the Coulomb potentials for interactions with protons were taken from three-parameter Fermi descriptions of the nuclear charge distributions. In contrast, with 10 B as the core, a rotation model was used to specify the interaction potential matrices input to MCAS calculations since the low-excitation spectra of 10 B does not show any semblance of a vibration model structure. However the spectra of 11 B and 11 C, described by the rotational model with the odd-odd 10 B core, set the second excited state, the 5 2 − level, too close to the first excited state, 1 2 − , making them to appear almost degenerate. This characteristic is not observed in the measured spectra of both mirror nuclei.
The vibration couplings to the collective motion of the even-even core states were important especially in the description of the states in 11 Be and 11 N. Those nuclei have positive-parity ground states, opposite to those of the ground states of the neighbouring mass-11 nuclei, with 11 Be having a single-neutron halo ground state. From phenomenological descriptions of that nucleus, significant coupling to the 2 + state in 10 Be is required in order to obtain the 1 2 + ground state. Such coupling is naturally included in the coupled-channel approach used.
The low-energy spectra of both the mass-10 and mass-11 nuclei considered were also described using complete basis space shell models. Specifically no-core (0+2) ω and (0 + 2 + 4) ω space shell-model studies were made. The complete (0 + 2 + 4) ω space was used to define the spectra of the mass-10 systems with the Zheng G-matrix interaction. For the mass-11 systems, the fitted interactions (MK3W and WBT) were used in the complete (0 + 2) ω model space. The low-energy spectrum for 11 Be obtained from the shell model calculation using the WBT interaction gave the correct spin-parity of the ground state, but not the energy of the first excited state. However, it is important to note that in that model significant occupation of a single neutron in the 1s 1/2 orbit is found, consistent with the single-neutron halo description of the ground state of 11 Be. Also, the spectroscopic amplitudes for the coupling of a neutron to states in 10 Be as obtained by the shell model support the significant coupling of the neutron to both the ground and 2 + states in 10 Be as required by MCAS.
The results of our calculations of the mirror systems, 11 C and 11 B treated as the clusters n+ 10 C and p+ 10 Be respectively, gave excellent agreement with the known spectra of these nuclei to over 10 MeV excitation and with the known nucleon separation energy. For 11 N and 11 Be treated as the clusters p+ 10 C and n+ 10 Be, however, the calculated results are not perfectly matched to the known spectra. But the sequencing and, notably, nucleon emission thresholds, are given correctly. Unlike 11 C and 11 B, 11 Be is weakly bound, while 11 N is unbound. These results, involving clusters coupling to form states in the weakly bound 11 Be and unbound 11 N, may indicate inadequacy in the simple collective model used to specify the coupledchannels Hamiltonian. The nuclei, 11 C and 11 B, considered as the clusters p+ 10 B and n+ 10 B respectively, were found to give reasonable spectra again to over 10 MeV excitation, notwithstanding a breaking of the 0s 1/2 shell in the specification of the OPP of the excited 0 + 1 state of the core which was found necessary to have the correct location of the 1 2 + state. That requirement is, in part, supported by the results of the shell-model calculation for 10 B.
Aside from there being insufficient data to provide constraints on the details of the structure model for 10 C, with even the spin-parities of two of those four states selected in the coupled-channel calculations being not listed in the data sheets, the assumed vibration model of structure for the core nuclei may be too simplistic. Improved structure models for 10 Be and 10 C need to be used before a higher quality agreement between known spectra with these cluster model results may be achieved. Lev Lafayette, Sean Crosby, Greg Sauter, Linh Vu and Bernard Meade, for the use of SPARTAN [23] in making all the calculations to find the MCAS results presented herein.