Firm spin and parity assignments for high-lying, low-spin levels in stable Si isotopes

A natural silicon target was investigated in a nat\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{\text {nat}}$$\end{document}Si(γ,γ′\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathbf {\gamma },\gamma ^{\prime }$$\end{document}) photon-scattering experiment with fully linearly-polarised, quasi-monochromatic γ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathbf {\gamma }$$\end{document} rays in the entrance channel. The mean photon energies used were ⟨Eγ⟩=\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\langle {E}_{\gamma }\rangle =$$\end{document} 9.33, 9.77, 10.17, 10.55, 10.93, and 11.37 MeV, and the relative energy spread (full width at half maximum) of the incident beam was ΔEγ/⟨Eγ⟩≈\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varDelta E_{\gamma }/\langle {E}_{\gamma }\rangle \approx $$\end{document} 3.5–4 %. The observed angular distributions for the ground-state decay allow firm spin and parity assignments for several levels of the stable even-even silicon isotopes.


Introduction
For a massive star to end its lifecycle in a type-II core collapse supernova, modern three-dimensional simulations have demonstrated the necessity for including neutrino-nucleus interactions as an additional heating mechanism (see, e.g., Refs. [1,2]). These interactions are for an even-even nucleus dominated by 1 + levels [3,4] forming Gamow-Teller (GT) a e-mail: marcus.scheck@uws.ac.uk (corresponding author) resonances [5]. Considering that a massive star in the last weeks of its lifecycle fuses lighter nuclei to form 28 Si, which subsequently acts as a seed to synthesise in the very last stage elements up to 56 Ni/ 56 Fe, it can be safely assumed that there is a considerable amount of silicon, in particular 28 Si, in the collapsing iron-nickel core or the shell surrounding it. Consequently, these Si nuclei are among the first to be exposed to the immense neutrino flux produced by the gravity-induced electron capture reactions, which trigger the core collapse. Therefore, it can be expected that the interaction of neutrinos with silicon nuclei contributes to the heating process. Of course, the temperatures (T ) of nuclei involved in a type-II supernova is far higher than the temperature of nuclei studied in the laboratory. The enhanced temperature causes a redistribution of the nucleons, which results in a thermal unblocking of otherwise fully occupied levels. This unblocking allows otherwise Pauli-forbidden Gamow-Teller strength for levels below the T = 0 Fermi level to occur; e.g., see Refs. [6,7] and references therein. Nevertheless, establishing a clear picture of the GT resonances under laboratory conditions presents nuclear theory with a low-temperature test case. One necessity when establishing the experimental picture is a firm assignment of spins and parities to the possible J π = 1 + levels that form the GT resonances.
In the past, the stable silicon isotopes, in particular 28 Si, were the subject of many studies [8][9][10]. Of relevance for this work are the results of previous 28 Si(e, e ) [11], 28 Si( p, p ) [12], and 28,30 Si(γ, γ ) [13] studies. The latter work used partially polarised bremsstrahlung, which allows firm spin and parity information to be extracted for strongly excited levels [14]. Interestingly, while both (e, e ) and (γ , γ ) data sets report firm spin-and parity J π information for several 1 + levels, many of the J π values in the evaluated database [8] are given in parentheses. For 30 Si, the experimental information given in Ref. [13] is currently not present in the database [10]. The proton-scattering experiments [12] confirmed the isovector nature for several of the observed 1 + levels of 28 Si. Furthermore, in spite of being observed in Ref. [13], no scattering cross sections for the J π = 1 − levels in 28 Si and 30 Si are given. For 28 Si, these studies have shown that the isovector M1 response is dominated by an extremely strongly excited 1 + level at 11446 keV. For 29 Si, no dedicated photonscattering experiment has been reported [9].
As in Ref. [15], the first objective of the photon-scattering experiments presented in this work was to exploit the wellknown excitation energy of the 11446-keV level as an energy calibration point for other nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements. However, the opportunity to measure more energy settings in combination with the high sensitivity of the experimental setup allowed for an unambiguous assignment or confirmation of spin and parity combinations for excited levels in 28 Si and 30 Si.

Experiment
The experiment was part of a NRF campaign at the High-Intensity γ -ray Source (HIγ S) at the Duke Free Electron Laser Laboratory [17] of the Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL). At HIγ S, electrons are circulated in a storage ring, and emit, in a Wiggler section, free-electronlaser light in the (near-)visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum. After being reflected by an optical mirror, the laser light collides at a well-defined interaction point with a second bunch of high-energy electrons. In this process, two effects play a crucial role. First, Compton scattering preserves the well-defined polarisation of the free-electronlaser light and, second, the Lorentz transformation into the rest frame of the (in the laboratory frame highly relativistic) electrons boosts the energy of the Compton-backscattered photons (CBP) into the MeV regime. Basically, the energy of the photons from the free-electron laser and the Lorentz boost can be adjusted via the electron energy. A narrow angle acceptance for the CBPs results in a fully linearly-polarised, quasi-monochromatic photon beam. In the present experiment, the angle selection was done using a collimator (12.8 mm diameter), which was ≈ 57 m downstream from the collision point. The photon beam was adjusted to mean energies, E γ , of 9.33, 9.77, 10.17, 10.55, 10.93, and 11.37 MeV. The energy spread corresponding to the full width at half maximum of a Gaussian-like distribution, ΔE γ , is 3.5-4% of the mean energy of the distribution with the above collimator. The measurement time was approximately 4 h for each energy setting.
Due to the limited momentum transfer, the absorption process for real photons is very spin selective and strongly favors dipole excitations. Hence, for even-even nuclei, J π = 1 π levels are excited almost exclusively. E2-excited 2 + levels are usually weakly populated and, often, their decay γ rays cannot be resolved from the background caused by incomplete detector response, pile-up events, a few events from cosmic rays, and Compton-scattered photons. Using the direction of the incident photon beam as the quantisation axis (polar angle θ ), the angular distribution of the emitted γ rays contains information about the angular momentum, J , of the excited level. Using fully linearly-polarised γ rays in the entrance channel allows an azimuthal angle, φ, with respect to the polarisation vector to be defined. Consequently, the momentum vector of the incident photon and its polarisation vector define the polarisation plane. In particular, the resonant cascades 0 + gs → J π → 0 + gs with excitation from and decay to the 0 + gs ground state exhibit a pronounced angular distribution, W (J π , θ, φ) [18]. In the phase convention of Krane, Steffen, and Wheeler [19], the angular distributions for an even-even nucleus are given as: Illustrations of these angular distributions can, for example, be found in Refs. [20,21]. For given spin and parity values, the angular distribution vanishes for specific angle combina- . The expected pattern for the occurrence of a ground-state decay in detectors at the angles θ and φ for spin and parity combination that can be excited with real photons is outlined in Table 1. For certain angle combinations, the vanishing angular distribution allows the observation of a pronounced spin and parity dependent analysing power , e.g.,: The observed experimental asymmetry ratio A can be defined as: where Q is the polarisation sensitivity of the setup and P is the degree of polarisation in the entrance channel. The present measurements used fully linearly-polarised photon beams and, consequently, P = 1. Q includes the finite opening angles of the detectors, which diminishes the ideal ratio of the analysing power . N (θ i , φ i ) are the relative-efficiency and electronic dead-time corrected count rates in the detector at angles θ i and φ i . The experiment employed a cylindrical (height 1.5 cm, diameter 1.65 cm) sample (mass: 7.6153 g) of natural silicon, consisting of 92.2 % 28 Si, 4.7 % 29 Si, and 3.1 % 30 Si. The NRF setup used for this analysis was located ≈60 m downstream from the collision point. The detector array was the so-called γ 3 setup [16] consisting of four high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors and four large-volume LaBr 3 scintillation detectors. In this work, only the data from the HPGe detectors were used. Their positioning, relative to the momentum vector (θ angle) and polarisation vector of the electric field (φ angle), is given in Table 2. The relative γray detection efficiency was simulated using the GEANT4 toolkit [22] for each HPGe detector and fitted to the wellknown lines of a 56 Co source [23]. This procedure allows Table 1 Expected peak occurrence (+), for a given spin and parity combination, J π , in an even-even nucleus, in the spectrum recorded in a point-like detector placed under the angles θ and φ according to  Counts Fig. 1 Portions of γ -ray spectra from the nat Si(γ , γ ) reaction recorded using the HPGe detectors of the γ 3 setup [16]. The angles at which the HPGe detectors were positioned are given in the respective panels. A definition of the angles is provided in the caption of Table 2. The mean energy of the incident photons was 9.4 MeV. The vertical (red) lines serve to guide the eye. For a discussion, see the text cross normalisation of the relative efficiency of one detector to another. For each detector, a two-point energy calibration was carried out using the peaks of the 2614.8-keV 208 Pb background and the well-known energy of the groundstate decay (E γ = 11441 keV) from the 11446-keV level in 28 Si. In order to enhance the statistics and decrease the statistical uncertainty, the spectra recorded in the detectors under the polar angle θ = 90 • and azimuthal angles φ = 0 • and 180 • were added and are in the following denoted as (θ, φ) = (90, 0). As the angular distributions are identical for those angles, this treatment is well justified.
Due to the high polarisation sensitivity of the setup and spin-selectivity of the reaction, the spin-parity assignment for levels which exhibit a ground-state transition is unambiguous. Examples of spectra recorded in the HPGe detectors of the γ 3 setup are presented in Figs. 1 and 2. The mean energies of the incident photons were 9.4 MeV (Fig. 1) and 9.8 MeV (Fig. 2), respectively. Figures 1 and 2 show portions of the γ -ray spectra in which the ground-state decays of the excited states are present. The Counts Fig. 2 Portions of γ -ray spectra from the nat Si(γ , γ ) reaction recorded using the HPGe detectors of the γ 3 setup. The angles at which the HPGe detectors were positioned are given in the respective panels. A definition of the angles is given in the caption of Table 2. The mean energy of the incident photons was 9.8 MeV. The vertical (red) lines serve to guide the eye. For a discussion, see the text Table 3 Experimental results for a level tentatively attributed to 29 Si [9]. Given are the level energy, E x , the observed γ -ray energy, E γ , the possible spin and parity, J π , the spin and parity, J π lit , from Ref.
[24], and the observed asymmetry, A (90,0);(135,0) . For a discussion, see the text (21) observed levels exhibit the expected patterns as outlined in Table 1. For example, in Fig. 1, the levels corresponding to the peaks at 9354 keV and 9496 keV have J π = 1 + , while the level corresponding to the 9479 keV peak has J π = 2 + , and no 1 − level is present in the energy region covered by the incident photons. However, in Fig. 2, the levels at 9620, 9792, and 9929 keV are unambigously identified as 1 − levels, while for the level at 9766 keV J π = 1 + can firmly be assigned. The levels at 9354, 9620, 9766, and 9792 keV correspond to known spin-1 levels in 30 Si [10], a nucleus of low content in the sample. In addition, a ground-state transition from a level at 9413 keV is present in the spectra of Fig. 1. In the literature for 29 Si [9], a level with a sole ground-state γ -ray decay is reported at this energy. Interestingly, the neutronseparation threshold for this nucleus is S n = 8473.6 keV, well below this level energy. In Ref. [24], a level at 9416 keV with J π = 3/2 − is reported to be excited in the 28 Si(n, γ ) reaction, with subsequent decay to the ground state. However, for a dipole excited level in an odd-mass nucleus, a pronounced angular correlation should also be present, but to a smaller extent than in an even-even one (see, e.g., Ref. [25]). For a 1/2 + → 1/2 π → 1/2 + cascade, an isotropic distribution is expected, which is clearly ruled out by the non-observation of the 9410-keV peak in the spectrum recorded at angles θ = 90 • , φ = 90 • (see Fig. 1). For a 1/2 + → 3/2 π → 1/2 + cascade, a parity-dependent angular distribution is expected that would still result in the observation of at least a few Table 4 Experimental results for levels attributed to 28 Si, namely the level energy, E x , the measured γ -ray energy, E γ , the assigned spin and parity J π , the spin and parity, J π lit , as found in the NNDC database [8], and the observed asymmetry, A (θ1,φ1);(θ2,φ2) as defined in Eq. (4). If no peak was observed in one of the spectra, no asymmetries involving this detector are given a Using the energy (1779 keV) of the 2 + 1 level from Ref. [8] b Taken from Ref. [8]. c 9212-keV γ ray from Ref. [8] not present, 10990(3) γ ray known from [26]. d Taken from Ref. [8] and used for energy calibration Table 5 Experimental results for levels attributed to 30 Si, namely the level energy, E x , the measured γ -ray energy, E γ , the assigned spin and parity, J π , the spin and parity, J π lit , as found in the NNDC database [10], and the observed asymmetry, A (θ1,φ1);(θ2,φ2) as defined in Eq. (4). If no peak was observed in one of the spectra, no asymmetries involving this detector are given  (20) events in the spectrum of the θ = 90 • , φ = 90 • detector, even when considering the reduced γ -ray detection efficiency of the setup in this direction. Given the relatively small amount of 29 Si in the target, the E2-excited 1/2 + → 5/2 + → 1/2 + cascade can be ruled out with a high degree of confidence.
In fact, the observed asymmetry A (90,0);(135,0) measured by the two detectors in the polarisation plane φ = 0 • , indicates J π = 1 + , this making an assignment to an even-even nucleus more likely. Consequently, this level is only tentatively assigned to the 9413-keV level reported in the literature for 29 Si. In order to fully answer the question about which nucleus this level belongs to, a measurement with a target of different isotopic composition is mandatory. The extracted experimental asymmetries are presented in Table 4 for levels assigned to 28 Si, in Table 3 for the level that is tentatively assigned to 29 Si, and in Table 5 for levels assigned to 30 Si. The extracted values, for levels for which ground-state transitions were observed in both relevant detectors, are compared to the theoretical expectations for an eveneven nucleus in Fig. 3. Part (a) shows the A (90,0);(90,90) values, A (90,90); (135,0) values are shown in part (b), and part (c) the A (90,0);(135,0) recorded in the polarisation plane are plotted. From the plot the enhanced polarisation sensitivity for M1-excited levels and reduced polarisation sensitivity for E1-excited levels are obvious. This is because the detectors at φ = 0 • and φ = 180 • were positioned closer to the scattering target than the one at φ = 90 • , resulting in comparably large opening angles. Thus, the polarisation sensitivity for J π = 1 − levels is reduced to Q ≈ 0.5 (part (a) and (c) in Fig. 3). At first the assignment for the level at 10200 keV seems dubious. However, considering the reduction of the experimental asymmetry due to the detector opening angles, which can be extracted using the other 1 − levels, within two sigma the parity of this level can be assigned to be negative. Hence, the observed data allow firm parity assignments for all J = 1 levels.
For two levels in 28 Si (see Table 6) transitions to lowerlying excited states were observed. For the decays from these 1 + levels to the first excited 2 + 1 level, no multipole-mixing ratio is known, only their relative-efficiency corrected relative intensities, I γ , multiplied by the angular distribution, Experimental asymmetries A (θ1,φ1);(θ2,φ2) for the observed ground-state decays as extracted from the spectra (see Tables 3, 4, and 5). The horizontal lines give the expected values, for an even-even nucleus, for a setup with perfect polarisation sensitivity, Q = 1 W (θ, φ), are given. For the 10596-keV level, two known low-energy γ rays are not observed, very likely due to the enhanced background at the energy of interest. One γ ray linking this level to the first excited 2 + 1 level is observed here for the first time. For the 10899-keV level, the decay to the first excited 0 + 2 level was not observed previously. Interestingly, for the 10992-keV level in 28 Si, there was previously only a decay to the 2 + 1 level given in the database [8] but no ground-state decay. However, in the present work, only the ground-state decay is observed with no decay to the 2 + 1 level. A recent 24 Mg(α, γ ) experiment [26] established a dominant ground-state branch of 85(8) % compared to a 15(3) % branch to the first excited 2 + 1 level. As this level is comparatively weakly excited in the present experiment, it is likely that the decay to the 2 + 1 level is hidden in the background.
These data involve only a limited range of excitation energies. Nevertheless, the importance of the silicon isotopes, as outlined in the introduction, demands a more thorough and systematic investigation to establish their complete M1 and E1 responses below the neutron separation threshold and, possibly, even above. This work provides, at least for the levels in the energy range covered, the parity information.

Summary
Unambiguous spin and parity assignments are provided for levels in 28 Si and 30 Si. Additionally, spins and parities of these levels established through this work allow the use of natural silicon samples as standard to calibrate angular distribution measurements similar to these carried out here.