Abstract
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) is an ideal substitute for traditional fluorescent temperature sensing materials due to its excellent luminescence properties. However, the poor linear correlation between the fluorescence intensity and temperature leads to low-temperature sensing sensitivity. This study aims to prepare CQDs with a high linear correlation between fluorescence intensity and temperature from Loblolly pine wood processing waste by the one-pot hydrothermal method. The synthesized CQDs presents temperature-dependent blue fluorescence. At 0–60°C, the fluorescence intensity of CQDs has a good linear relationship with temperature, and a wide response range. Under this temperature response range, the fluorescence intensity series data of the CQDs obtained experimentally, and the chemical reaction rate series data calculated by the Arrhenius equation have a high degree of fit, high sensitivity. Reversible the fluorescence recovery rate is high. Under cryogenic storage conditions, the PL emission retention rate of CQDs after 60 d storage is high.
REFERENCES
Y. Zhao, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 817, 152691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152691
Y. G. Jia, K. F. Chen, M. Gao, et al., Sci. China Chem. 64, 403 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-020-9893-6
S. Arab, S. Masoum, and E. Seyed Hosseini, IEEE, Sens. J. 20, 1705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2949581
R. Ren, Z. Zhang, P. Zhao, et al., J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 40, 627 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2018.1475239
S. Uchiyama and C. Gota, Rev. Anal. Chem. 36, 20160021 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/revac-2016-0021
Q. Su, X. Wei, J. Mao, and X. Yang, Colloid Surf., A 562, 86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.11.015
X. C. Yang, Q. Li, M. Tang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 12, 20849 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02206
A. Carattino, M. Caldarola, and M. Orrit, Nano Lett. 18, 874 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04145
H. Zhang, W. Han, X. Cao, et al., Microchim. Acta 186, 353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3460-3
L. Shang, F. Stockmar, N. Azadfar, and G. U. Nienhaus, Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201306366
A. Rakovich and T. Rakovich, J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 2690 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb00153g
L. Qin, G. Ma, L. Wang, and Z. Tang, Energy Chem. 57, 359 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.09.003
M. Yamauchi and S. Masuo, Chem.-Eur. J. 26, 7176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905807
Z. Lv, Y. Wang, J. Chen, et al., Chem. Rev. 120, 3941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00730
M. J. Gallagher, J. T. Buchman, T. A. Qiu, et al., Environ. Sci.-Nano 5, 1694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8en00249e
B. Gayen, S. Palchoudhury, and J. Chowdhury, J. Nanomater. 2019, 3451307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3451307
X. Xu, R. Ray, Y. Gu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 12736 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja040082h
J. Hua, Z. Mu, P. Hua, et al., Talanta 219, 121279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121279
H. A. Akter, P. Dwivedi, W. Anderson, and M. Lamb, Agroforest Syst. 95, 241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00584-5
J. Gu, I. Kirsch, T. Schripp, et al., Atmos. Environ. 193, 101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.064
H. Qi, M. Teng, M. Liu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 539, 332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.047
M. Xue, M. Zou, J. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 6783 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb01073j
G. Hu, L. Ge, Y. Li, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 579, 96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.06.034
X. Sun, Y. Liu, N. Niu, and L. Chen, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 411, 5519 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01930-y
S. Tao, S. Lu, Y. Geng, S. Zhu, S. A. T. Redfern, Y. Song, T. Feng, W. Xu, and B. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 130, 2393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201712662
S. Zhao, X. Song, X. Chai, et al., J. Clean. Prod. 263, 121561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121561
E. O. Oseghe, T. A. M. Msagati, B. B. Mamba, and A. E. Ofomaja, Ceram. Int. 45, 14379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.121
Y. Hu, J. Yang, J. Tian, et al., Carbon 77, 775 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.081
A. Förster, H. Culmsee, and C. Leuschner, Forest. Ecol. Manag. 479, 118575 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118575
Z. Wei, G. Zeng, F. Huang, et al., J. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 99, 7369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6752-5
M. Si, M. Sillanpää, S. Zhuo, et al., Ind. Crop. Prod. 152, 112469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112469
X. Gong, X. Gao, W. Du, et al., Opt. Mater. 96, 109302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109302
T. Gao, X. Wang, J. Zhao, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 12, 22002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02500
H. Yang, Y. Long, H. Li, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 516, 192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.054
Z. Mu, J. Hua, and Y. Yang, Spectrochim. Acta, Sect. A 224, 117444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2019.117444
M. J. Krysmann, A. Kelarakis, P. Dallas, and E. P. Giannelis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja204661r
S. Pramanik, S. Chatterjee, G. S. Kumar, and P. S. Devi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 20476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02872a
D. Zhao, Z. Zhang, X. Liu, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 119, 111468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111468
J. Ci, Y. Tian, S. Kuga, et al., Chem.-Asian. J. 12, 2916 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201700880
X. L. Hao, X. H. Pan, Y. Gao, et al., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 20, 2045 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2020.17374
F. F. Du, G. Li, et al., Sens. Actuators, B 277, 492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.027
M. K. Kumawat, R. Srivastava, M. Thakur, and R. B. Gurung, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 1382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01893
L. Zhang, S. Lyu, Q. Zhang, et al., Ind. Crop. Prod. 145, 112066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112066
J. Masa, S. Barwe, C. Andronescu, and W. Schuhmann, Chem.-Eur. J. 25, 158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201805264
C. M. Kelleher, J. A. O’Mahony, A. L. Kelly, et al., J. Food. Sci. 83, 937 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14097
P. Geng, W. Li, X. Zhang, et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 40LT02 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa85ad
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank First-Class Discipline Construction, International Innovation Highland of Forest Product Chemistry, Advanced Analysis and Testing Center of Nanjing Forestry University for supporting the work.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32071703) and Youth Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education (grant no. 19YJC760132).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, M., Guo, D., Tang, J. et al. Temperature Sensing Performance of Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots Prepared from Loblolly Pine Processing Waste. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3070–3081 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423030202
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423030202