Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative-Resource Directions of Industrial Development: The Example of the South of the Tyumen Oblast

  • REGIONAL PROBLEMS
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

The article analyzes the innovative-resource directions for the development of industry in the South of the Tyumen oblast (subject of the Russian Federation–the Tyumen oblast without okrugs—STO) based on the concepts of evolutionary economic geography and the theory of innovation. It is shown that the development of the South of the Tyumen oblast economy is associated with the formation of an oil industry cluster, deep processing of hydrocarbon raw materials, and the development of oil and gas resources. The development of the noted areas is largely determined by the already created innovative and industrial potential, long-term cooperation with the oil and gas regions of Western Siberia, and the prospects for the development of the oil and gas sector. The effective development of these areas requires the formation and implementation of a targeted policy of the region, focused, among other things, on the development of its own innovative companies, attracting new knowledge and competencies from other regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Notes

  1. Up to the present time, it is still difficult to say that a full-fledged, competitive OIC has been created at the STO. Nevertheless, we will use this term, taking into account the general stages of the evolution of the development of clusters.

  2. Oil and gas cluster of the Tyumen region. https://www.ank72.ru/. Accessed October 7, 2021.

  3. OOO RN-Uvatneftegaz. Story. PJSC NK Rosneft, 2021. https://ung.rosneft.ru/about/Glance/OperationalStructure/ Dobicha_i_razrabotka/Zapadnaja_Sibir/ung/. Accessed July 25, 2021.

  4. ZapSibNeftekhim. Story. PJSC SIBUR, 2021. https://www.sibur.ru/zapsibneftekhim/about/history/. Accessed September 15, 2021.

  5. The Russian Ministry of Energy has concluded investment agreements on the creation of new petrochemical facilities with PJSC SIBUR Holding. Ministry of Energy, 2022. https://minenergo.gov.ru/node/2241. Accessed January 15, 2022.

REFERENCES

  1. V. A. Kryukov and A. N. Tokarev, “Analysis of the knowledge base in the oil and gas sector of Russia: Patents for inventions,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 3, 84–99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-3-84-99

  2. F. Pinheiro, D. Hartmann, R. Boschma, and C. Hidalgo, “The time and frequency of unrelated diversification,” Res. Policy, 51 (8), 104323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Martin and P. Sunley, “Path dependence and regional economic evolution,” J. Econ. Geogr. 6 (4), 395–437 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Boschma, “Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda,” Reg. Stud. 51 (3), 351–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. Balland, R. Boschma, J. Crespo, and D. Rigby, “Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification,” Reg. Stud. 53 (9), 1252–1268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Boschma and K. Frenken, “Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography,” J. Econ. Geogr. 6 (3), 273–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Xiao, R. Boschma, and M. Andersson, “Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness,” Econ. Geogr. 94 (5), 514–549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Silvestre and R. Dalcol, “Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil,” Technovation 29 (8), 549–561 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. A. Kryukov and V. V. Shmat, “Asian Russia – conditions and obstacles for the progressive diversification of the economy of the macroregion,” Prostranstv. Ekon. 18 (1), 34–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.1.034-072

  10. M. Breul and T. Nguyen, “The impact of extractive industries on regional diversification—Evidence from Vietnam,” Extr. Ind. Soc. 11, 100982 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hassink, A. Isaksen, and M. Tripp, “Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development,” Reg. Stud. 53 (11), 1636–1645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Trippl, M. Grillitsch, and A. Isaksen, “Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development,” Prog. Hum. Geogr. 42 (5), 687–705 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P.-A. Balland and R. Boschma, “Complementary interregional linkages and smart specialisation: An empirical study on European regions,” Reg. Stud. 55 (6), 1059–1070 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Kryukov and A. Tokarev, “Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?,” Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 14 (1), 127–146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Kryukov and A. Tokarev, “Spatial dynamics of the oil and gas field services sector: Global trends and lessons for Russia,” Reg. Res. Russ. 8 (3), 248–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518030036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Boschma, V. Martin, and A. Minondo, “Neighbour regions as the source of new industries,” Pap. Reg. Sci. 96 (2), 227–245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Solheim and R. Tveterås, “Benefitting from co-location? Evidence from the upstream oil and gas industry,” Extr. Ind. Soc. 4 (4), 904–914 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Porter, “Clusters and the new economics of competition,” Harvard Bus. Rev. 76 (6), 77–90 (1998). https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=46852.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Porter, On Competition (Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, 1998; Vil’yams, Moscow, 2000).

  20. K. Aziz and M. Norhashim, “Cluster-based policy making: Assessing performance and sustaining competitiveness,” Rev. Policy Res. 25 (4), 349–375 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00336.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Clark, Tech Country: Looking Beyond London in Search of Britain’s Technological Future (British Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, London, 2013).

  22. A. Deev, S. Chernomorchenko, A. Khvoshchin, and D. Vakorin, “Tyumen oblast: Experience of post-industrial economic development,” Vestn. Evraz. Nauki 10 (5), 15ECVN518 (2018). https://esj.today/PDF/ 15ECVN518.pdf. Cited October 23, 2021.

  23. S. Scholvin, “Obstacles to linkage-based diversification in the oil and gas sector,” Extr. Ind. Soc. 11, 100996 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O. S. Pchelintsev, Regional Economy in the System of Sustainable Development (Nauka, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. Kryukov and V. Shmat, “Petro-gas chemistry in Russia’s East: Growth driver or ballast?,” Reg. Res. Russ. 11 (2), 177–189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521020076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Kryukov and V. Shmat, “Russian petrochemical industry in space and time,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 31 (6), 629–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720060088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomsk Oblast: Difficult Choice of Own Path (Institut ekonomiki i organizatsii promyshlennogo proizvodstva Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Novosibirsk, 2014) [in Russian].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Resource Economics, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

    V. A. Kryukov & A. N. Tokarev

Authors
  1. V. A. Kryukov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. N. Tokarev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Tokarev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

The article was prepared based on the results of studies carried out within the framework of the research plan of the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, under Project 5.6.3.2. (0260-2021-0004) “Resource territories of the East of Russia and the Arctic zone: Features of the processes of interaction and ensuring the connectivity of regional economies in the context of modern scientific, technological and social challenges.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kryukov, V.A., Tokarev, A.N. Innovative-Resource Directions of Industrial Development: The Example of the South of the Tyumen Oblast. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 25–32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723010100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723010100

Keywords:

Search

Navigation