Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing the VAT Rate in Russia from the Position of the Laffer Curve

  • FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

One simple economic model, frequently cited but difficult to empirically calculate, is the Laffer curve: the relationship between the level of taxation and tax revenues. The increase in the VAT rate in Russia from 18 to 20% since 2019 can be considered as an empirical test of the existence of patterns in the Laffer curve at a particular point in time. From the Laffer curve it follows that with an increase in the tax rate, revenue should increase at a slower rate. In contrast, the volume of VAT payments in 2019 increased at a faster pace than the growth in value added. The paper proposes an explanation of this contradiction in terms of the impact of efforts to ensure tax collection. Increase in the basic tax rate by 2% pp led to a reduction in the return on efforts to ensure the collection of the tax. A five-year period of fast outpacing tax revenue growth came to an end almost simultaneously with the increase in the VAT rate. We can conclude that the economy, even with a relatively small increase in the tax rate, predictably reduces the ability of the state to extract additional income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.tax.en/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/.

  2. https://www.tax.en/rn77/news/activities_feet/9278853/.

  3. https://ics.en/economicheskaya-politics/byudzhet-i-taxes/how- vyrosli-taxes-za-poslednie-5-let.

REFERENCES

  1. J. Wanniski, “Taxes, revenues, and the Laffer curve,” Publ. Interest 50, 3–14 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. M. Heijman and J. A. C. van Ophem, “Willingness to pay tax: the Laffer curve revisited for 12 OECD countries,” J. Soc. Econ. 34 (5), 714–723 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Badel and M. Huggett, “the sufficient statistic approach: predicting the top of the Laffer curve,” J. Monet. Econ. 87, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.02.001

  4. G. Gomeh and M. Strawczynski, “Simulating corporate tax rate at Laffer Curve’s peak using microdata,” J. Econ. Bus. 112, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105930

  5. S. N. Alpysbaeva, M. K. Kenzhebulat, and G. Zh. Karashulakov, “Potential for an increase in the tax burden at the reduction of the zone of fiscal contradictions (based on the materials of the economy of Kazakhstan),” Ekon. Zh. Vysh. Shk. Ekon. 23 (3), 365–383 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Makasheva, “Macroeconomic reconciliation? (About the book by Yu. Ananiashvili and V. Papava. Laffer-Keynesian synthesis and macroeconomic equilibrium),” Vopr. Ekon., No. 3, 151–159 (2015).

  7. E. Balatskii, “Effectiveness of the state’s fiscal policy,” Probl. Prognozirovaniya, No. 5, 32–45 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Papava, “Laffer effect with aftereffect,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunarod. Otnosh., No. 7, 34–39 (2001).

  9. E. Balatskii, “Invariance of fiscal Laffer points,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunarod. Otnosh., No. 6, 62–71 (2003).

  10. E. Balatskii and N. Ekimova, “Fiscal policy and economic growth,” O-vo Ekon., No. 4, 197–214 (2011).

  11. Yu. Ananiashvili and V. Papava, “Laffer-Keynesian synthesis and macroeconomic equilibrium,” O-vo Ekon, No. 9, 98–119 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kakaulina, “Impact of the tax burden on economic growth in the Russian Federation: a regional aspect,” Nalogi Nalogooblozh., No. 17(344), 55–64 (2014).

  13. K. Isakov and S. Pekarskii, “Assessment of the impact of financial repression on budget revenues,” Ekon. Polit. 11 (5), 28–49 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2016-5-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. V. Balatsky and N. A. Ekimova, “Evaluation of Russian economic sectors' sensitivity to tax burden,” J. Tax Reform, No. 6 (2), 157–179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Ivanova, M. Keen, and A. Klemm, “The Russian 'flat tax' reform,” Econ. Policy 20 (43), 397, 399–444 (2005).

  16. Y. Gorodnichenko, J. Martinez-Vazquez, and Peter K. Sabirianova, “Myth and reality of flat tax reform: micro estimates of tax evasion response and welfare effects in Russia,” J. Polit. Econ., No. 117 (3), 504–554 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1086/599760

  17. F. G. de Oliveira and L. Costa, “The VAT Laffer curve and the business cycle in the EU27: an empirical approach,” Econ. Iss. 20 (2), 29–44 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Pappadá and Y. Zylberberg, “Austerity and tax compliance,” Eur. Econ. Rev. 100, 506–524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Waseem, “Taxes, informality and income shifting: evidence from a recent Pakistani tax reform,” J. Publ. Econ. 157, 41–77 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Kurovskii, Assessment of the contribution of the VAT increase to annual inflation. Analytic note, Bank of Russia, December 2019. http://www.cbr.ru/content/document/file/94684/analytic_note_20191217_ ddcp_01.pdf. Cited May 25, 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Kalinin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalinin, A.M. Increasing the VAT Rate in Russia from the Position of the Laffer Curve. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 33, 353–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700722030042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700722030042

Keywords:

Navigation