Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the ability of some physiological traits to identify drought-tolerant bread wheat genotypes. To this end, twenty bread wheat genotypes were assessed under post anthesis drought stress (rain-fed) and irrigated conditions. The Stress Tolerance Index (STI) was used as a measure of drought tolerance. Relationships between STI and Cell Membrane Stability (CMS), Proline Concentration (PC), Relative Water Content (RWC), Chlorophyll a/b Ratio (Chl a/b), Relative Chlorophyll Content (RCC), Excised Leaf Water Retention (ELWR), and Relative Water Loss (RWL) were determined in order to find out whether these physiological traits could be used as the indicators of drought tolerance. The results showed that ELWR, RWL, and CMS could be considered as reliable indicators in screening wheat genotypes for drought tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Chl:

chlorophyll

CMS:

cell membrane stability

ELWR:

excised leaf water retention

PC:

proline concentration

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

RCC:

relative chlorophyll content

RWC:

relative water content

RWL:

relative water loss

SPAD:

soil and plant analyzer

STI:

stress tolerance index

Yp:

grain yield under irrigated condition

Ys:

grain yield under rain-fed condition

References

  1. Kirigwi, F.M., van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R., Sears, R.G., Rajaram, S., and Paulsen, G.M., Evaluation of Selection Strategies for Wheat Adaptation across Water Regimes, Euphytica, 2004, vol. 135, pp. 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farshadfar, E., Mohammadi, R., Aghaee, M., and Sutka, J., Identification of QTLs Involved in Physiological and Agronomic Indicator of Drought Tolerance in Rye using a Multiple Selection Index, Acta Agron. Hung., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitra, J., Genetics and Genetic Improvement of Drought Resistance in Crop Plants, Curr. Sci., 2001, vol. 80, pp. 758–762.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez, G.C.J., Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Stress Tolerance, Proc. Int. Symp. Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Kuo, C.G., Ed., Tainan, Taiwan: AVRDC Publ., 1992, pp. 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., and Mohammadi, V., Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indices under Various Environmental Conditions, Field Crop Res., 2006, vol. 98, pp. 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hura, T., Grzesiak, S., Hura, K., Thiemtm, E., Tokarz, K., and Wedzony, M., Physiological and Biochemical Tools Useful in Drought-Tolerance Detection in Genotypes of Winter Triticale: Accumulation of Ferulic Acid Correlates with Drought Tolerance, Ann. Bot., 2007, vol. 100, pp. 767–775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Tayeb, M.A., Differential Response of Two Vicia faba Cultivars to Drought: Growth, Pigments, Lipid, Peroxidation, Organic Solutes, Catalase, and Peroxidase Activity, Acta Agron. Hung., 2006, vol. 54, pp. 25–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozturk, L. and Demir, Y., In Vivo and In Vitro Protective Role of Proline, Plant Growth Regul., 2002, vol. 38, pp. 259–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocheva, K., Lambreveb, P., Georgieva, G., Goltsevo, V., and Karsbalived, M., Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Injury in the Leaves of Barley Cultivars under Osmotic Stress, Bioelectrochemistry, 2004, vol. 63, pp. 121–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saneoka, H., Moghaieb, R.E.A., Premachandra, G.S., and Fujita K., Nitrogen Nutrition and Water Stress Effects on Cell Membrane Stability and Leaf Water Relations in Agrostis polustris Huds, Environ. Exp. Bot., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 131–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rong-Hua, L., Pei-guo, G., Baum, M., Grando, S., and Ceccarelli, S., Evaluation of Chlorophyll Content and Fluorescence Parameters as Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Barley, Agric. Sci. Chin., 2006, vol. 5, pp. 751–757.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunes, A., Inal, A., Adak, M.S., Bagci, E.G., Cicek, N., and Eraslan, F., Effect of Drought Stress Implemented at Preor Post-Anthesis Stage on Some Physiological Parameters as Screening Criteria in Chickpea Cultivars, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2008, vol. 55, pp. 59–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sullivan, C.Y., Sorghum in the Seventies: Mechanism of Heat and Drought Resistance in Grain Sorghum and Methods of Measurement, Sorghum in the Seventies, Rao, N.G.P. and House, L.R., Ed., New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publ. Co., 1972, pp. 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bates, I.S., Waldrn, R.P., and Teare, I.D., Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress, Plant Soil, 1973, vol. 39, pp. 205–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner, N.C., Crop Water Deficit: A Decade of Progress, Adv. Agron., 1986, vol. 39, pp. 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farshadfar, E., Afarinesh, A., and Sutka, J., Inheritance of Drought Tolerance in Maize, Cer. Res. Commun., 2002, vol. 30, pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L., and Borghi, B., Evaluation of Field and Laboratory Predictors of Drought and Heat Tolerance in Winter Cereals, Can. J. Plant Sci., 1997, vol. 77, pp. 523–531.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horii, A., McCu, P., and Shetty, K., Seed Vigor Studies in Corn, Soybean and Tomato in Response to Fish Protein Hydrolysates and Consequences on Phenolic-Linked Responses, Biores. Technol., 2007, vol. 98, pp. 2170–2177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong-Bo, S., Xiao-Yan, C., and Li-Ye, C., Xi-Ning, Z., Gang, W., Yong-Bing, Y., Chang-Xing, Z., and Zan-Min, H., Investigation on the Relationship of Proline with Wheat Anti-Drought under Soil Water Deficits, Colloids Surf., B, 2006, vol. 53, pp. 113–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan, A.J., Hassan, S., Tariq, M., and Khan, T., Haploidy Breeding and Mutagenesis for Drought Tolerance in Wheat, Euphytica, 2001, vol. 120, pp. 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kocheva, K.V., Kartesva, T., Landjeva, S., and Georgiev, G.I., Physiological Response of Wheat Seedlings to Mild and Severe Osmotic Stress, Cereal Res. Commun., 2009, vol. 37, pp. 199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kocheva, K. and Georgieva, G., Evaluation of the Reaction of Two Contrasting Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Cultivars in Response to Osmotic Stress with PEG 6000, Bulg. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 29, pp. 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bandurska, H., Does Proline Accumulated in Leaves of Water Deficit Stressed Barley Plants Confine Cell Membrane Injury? 1. Free Proline Accumulation and Membrane Injury Index in Drought and Osmotically Stressed Plants, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2001, vol. 22, pp. 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Kahrizi.

Additional information

This text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geravandi, M., Farshadfar, E. & Kahrizi, D. Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russ J Plant Physiol 58, 69–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443711010067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443711010067

Keywords

Navigation