Skip to main content
Log in

Lunar Tides in the Mesopause Region Obtained from Summer Temperature of the Hydroxyl Emission Layer

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The summer mesopause region (altitudes of 82–92 km) is the coldest place in the Earth’s atmosphere; it is influenced by external effects, including lunar tides. In this study, we isolate the lunar tidal harmonics from the temperature series of the hydroxyl emission layer (OH*) obtained from spectrophotometric measurements at the Zvenigorod scientific station of the Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, in the summer seasons of 2000–2016. The OH* temperatures are the weighted average in a layer of ~9 km thick, which has a maximum at an altitude of ~87 km. The analysis made it possible to distinguish lunar oscillations, among which two harmonics in the temperature of the mesopause region are identified for the first time. These oscillations are recognized as the second harmonic of the anomalistic lunar tide (the mean period is ~13.78 days) and the lunar tide with a period of 8 h 17 min, or, interpreting alternatively, the third harmonic of the lunar synodic month (~9.84 days).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Baker, D.J. and Stair, A.T., Rocket measurements of the altitude distributions of the hydroxyl airglow, Phys. Scr., 1988, no. 37, pp. 611–622.

  2. Bizouard, Ch., Eanes, R., and Ray, R., Tidal variations in the Earth’s rotation, in IERS Conventions (2003), IERS Tech. Note no. 32, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 2004, ch. 8, pp. 92–98.

  3. https://www.iers.org/SharedDocs/Publikationen/EN/IERS/ Publications/tn/TechnNote32/tn32.pdf;jsessionid= 79A64DE566E90EEBB5B41551375EE98C.live2?__ blob=publicationFile&v=1.

  4. Chapman, S. and Lindzen, R.S., Atmospheric Tides, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalin, P.A., Pertsev, N.N., and Romejko, V.A., Significance of lunar impact on noctilucent clouds, J. Atmos. Sol.- Terr. Phys., 2006, vol. 68, pp. 1653–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalin, P., Kirkwood, S., Pertsev, N., and Perminov, V., Influence of solar and lunar tides on the mesopause region as observed in polar mesosphere summer echoes characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 2017, vol. 122. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026509

  7. Egedal, J., The tides of the upper atmosphere and the heights of meteors, Nature, 1929, vol. 124, no. 3137, pp. 913–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiedler, J. and Baumgarten, G., Solar and lunar tides in noctilucent clouds as determined by ground-based lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2018, vol. 18, pp. 16051–16061. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16051-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishkova, L.M., Nochnoe izluchenie sredneshirotnoi verkhnei atmosfery Zemli (Nocturnal Airglow of the Midlatitude Upper Atmosphere of the Earth), Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1983.

  10. Goldberger, A.S., A Course in Econometrics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanslmeier, A., The Sun and Space Weather, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.

  12. Hoffmann, C.G., von Savigny, C., Hervig, M.E., and Oberbremer, E., The lunar semidiurnal tide at the polar summer mesopause observed by SOFIE, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2018, vol. 167, pp. 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kropotkina, E.P. and Shefov, N.N., Influence of lunar tides on the probability of appearance of noctilucent clouds, Izv., Acad. Sci., USSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys. (Engl. Transl.), 1976, vol. 11, pp. 741–742.

  14. Li, G.Q., Zong, H.F., and Zhang, Q.Y., 27.3-day and average 13.6-day periodic oscillations in the Earth’s rotation rate and atmospheric pressure fields due to celestial gravitation forcing, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 2011, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-0011-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Melchior, P., The Earth Tides, New York: Pergamon, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Montenbruc, O. and Pfleger, T., Astronomy on the Personal Computer, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Mursula, K. and Zieger, B., The 13.5-day periodicity in the Sun, solar wind, and geomagnetic activity: The last three solar cycles, J. Geophys. Res., 1996, vol. 101, pp. 27077–27090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pertsev, N. and Dalin, P., Lunar semimonthly signal in cloudiness: Lunar-phase or lunar-declination effect?, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2010, vol. 72, pp. 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pertsev, N. and Perminov, V., Response of the mesopause airglow to solar activity inferred from measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia, Ann. Geophys., 2008, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1049–1056. https://www.ann-geophys.net/26/ 1049/2008.

  20. Pertsev, N., Dalin, P., and Romejko, V., A lunar signal in summer nighttime tropospheric cloudiness and in noctilucent clouds, Proc. 18th ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon 385 Programmes and Related Research, Visby: Eur. Space Agency, 2007, no. ESA SP-647, pp. 589–592.

  21. Pertsev, N.N., Dalin, P.A., and Perminov, V.I., Influence of semidiurnal and semimonthly lunar tides on the mesopause as observed in hydroxyl layer and noctilucent clouds characteristics, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 811–820.

  22. Pokrovskii, G.B. and Teptin, G.M., Lunar tides in the upper atmosphere according to radiometeor observations, Astron. Tsirk., 1970, no. 597, pp. 5–7.

  23. Sawada, R., The atmospheric lunar tides, N.Y. Univ. Meteorol. Pap., 1954, vol. 2, no. 3.

  24. Semenov, A.I. and Shefov, N.N., An empirical model for the variations in the hydroxyl emission, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 1996, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 468–480.

  25. Semenov, A.I., Bakanas, V.V., Perminov, V.I., Zheleznov, Yu.A., and Khomich, V.Yu., The near infrared spectrum of the emission of the nighttime upper atmosphere of the Earth, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2002, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 390–397.

  26. Shefov, N.N., Some properties of hydroxyl airglow, in Polyarnye siyaniya i svechenie nochnogo neba (Aurorae and Airglow), Moscow: Nauka. 1967, no. 13. pp. 37–43.

  27. Shefov, N.N., Semenov, A.I., and Khomich, V.Yu., Izluchenie verkhnei atmosfery—indikator ee struktury i dinamiki (Airglow as an Indicator of Upper Atmospheric Structure and Dynamics), Moscow: GEOS, 2006.

  28. Shpynev, B.G., Oinats, A.V., Lebedev, V.P., Chernigovskaya, M.A., Orlov, I.I., Belinskaya, A.Yu., and Grekhov, O.M., Manifestation of gravitational tides and planetary waves in long-term variations in geophysical parameters, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2014, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 500–512.

  29. Sidorenkov, N.S., Atmosfernye protsessy i vrashchenie Zemli (Atmospheric Processes and the Earth’s Rotation), St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 2002.

  30. Spivak, A.A., Ryabova, S.A., and Kharlamov, V.A., The electric field in the surface atmosphere of the megapolis of Moscow, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2019, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 467–478.

  31. von Savigny, C., Lednyts’kyy, O., Forbes, J.M., and Zhang, X., Lunar semidiurnal tide in the terrestrial airglow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2015, vol. 42, pp. 3553–3559. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. von Savigny, C., Deland, M.T., and Schwartz, M.J., First identification of lunar tides in satellite observations of noctilucent clouds, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2017, vol. 162, pp. 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoder, C.F., Williams, J.G., and Parke, M.E., Tidal variations of earth rotation, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1981, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 881–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-05-00358a.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. N. Pertsev.

Additional information

Translated by M. Chubarova

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

1.1 Verification of the Possible Influence of the Second Harmonic of the Carrington Solar Period on the Detection of the Lunar Zonal Tide

The frequency proximity of the lunar (mean period 13.6608 days) and solar harmonics (13.6376 days) makes it necessary to verify the dependence of the hydroxyl-temperature response to sinusoidal signals on their period and to compare this with the response to the quasi-sinusoidal signal sin2L) representing the zonal tide. A more direct method—the simultaneous selection of two sinusoidal or quasi-sinusoidal signals of close frequencies within the MLRA—is vulnerable to small errors due to the multicollinearity (mutual conditioning) of the basic variables on time series of limited length. The calculations in this verification were based on the same MLRA scheme described in Section 3, except that the quasi-sinusoid sin2L) was replaced by two (sinusoidal and cosinusoidal) signals of the same period, which alternately changed with a step of ~0.02 days in the vicinity of the solar and lunar harmonics given above. A pair of signals in the same period made it possible to calculate the amplitude and phase of the input sinusoid corresponding to the largest temperature response.

Figure 2 gives the results of these calculations. It shows the amplitudes of the response to monochromatic signals of different frequencies and the signal sin2L). In this case, the amplitude of the latter was determined such that the maximum amplitude of this signal on the time scale was equal to 1, as in the case of monochromatic sinusoids. The vertical lines show the confidence intervals of the response amplitudes for a 90% probability. In addition, Fig. 1 shows the corresponding level of statistical significance (probability of a random response). The test results indicate the following.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Amplitudes of the hydroxyl temperature response to sinusoidal signals with periods in the range of 13.6–13.7 days (solid black line) in comparison with the amplitude of the response to the sin2L) signal representing the lunar zonal tide (black triangle). The gray dashed line (right scale) shows the corresponding level of statistical significance. The level of statistical significance for the response to the sin2L) signal is shown with a gray circle. Some details of the figure are explained in the text of the Appendix.

1. The statistical significance and amplitude of the temperature response to a quasi-sinusoidal signal sin2L) representing the zonal tide is higher than for monochromatic signals of the same amplitude and period, as well as the solar period of 13.6376 days and other periods in their vicinity.

2. The maximum of the frequency dependence and statistical significance of the temperature response to monochromatic signals is much closer to the lunar period of 13.6608 days than to the solar period of 13.6376 days.

3. The slower decay of this dependence toward shorter periods suggests a slight influence of the indicated solar harmonic on the results for the zonal lunar tide, and, accordingly, a slight distortion of the temperature response to the zonal lunar tide. More accurate conclusions will require much longer time series.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pertsev, N.N., Dalin, P.A. & Perminov, V.I. Lunar Tides in the Mesopause Region Obtained from Summer Temperature of the Hydroxyl Emission Layer. Geomagn. Aeron. 61, 259–265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221020109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221020109

Navigation