Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The risk environment for HIV transmission: Results from the Atlanta and Flagstaff network studies

  • Special Feature: Social Networks
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission may be facilitated or obstructed by network structure, incorporating a measure of risk that combines true risk and surrogates. Persons at presumed high risk for HIV were enrolled in long-term follow-up studies of urban and rural networks in Atlanta, Georgia, and Flagstaff, Arizona. We focused on respondents who were also contacts to evaluate information on both sides of the observed dyads and constructed a Risk Indicator, based on a four-digit binary number, that permitted assessment and visualization of the overall risk environment. We constructed graphs that provided visualization of the level of risk, the types of relationships, and the actual network. Although some of the findings conform to the hypotheses relating network structure to transmission, there were several anomalies. In Atlanta, HIV prevalence was most strongly related to men with a male sexual orientation, despite the widespread use of injectable drugs. In Flagstaff, an area of very low prevalence and no transmission, the risk environment appeared more intense, and the frequency of microstructures was as great or greater than representative areas in Atlanta. The network hypothesis is not yet sufficiently developed to account for empirical observations that demonstrate the presence of intense, interactive networks in the absence of transmission of HIV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodman SN. P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:485–496.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenland S. Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology. 1990;1: 421–429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feinstein AR. P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(4):355–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feinstein AR. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Science. 1988;242:1257–1263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Savitz DZ, Greenland S, Stolley PD, Kelsey JL. Scientific standards of criticism: a reaction to “Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life,” by A. R. Feinstein. Epidemiology. 1990;1:78–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taubes G. Epidemiology faces its limits. Science. 1995;269:164–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garnett GP, Anderson RM. Factors controlling the spread of HIV in heterosexual communities in developing countries: patterns of mixing between different age and sexual activity classes. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1993;342:137–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothenberg RB. Model trains of thought. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;24:201–203.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klovdahl AS. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(11):1203–1216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B, et al. Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1289–1296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Muth SQ. Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10:182–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Potterat JJ, Phillips-Plummer L, Muth SQ, et al. Risk network structure in the early epidemic phase of HIV transmission in Colorado Springs. Sex Transm Infect. In press.

  13. Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Rothenberg RB, et al. Sexual network structure as indicator of epidemic phase. Sex Transm Infect. In press.

  14. Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth SQ, Darrow WW, Klovdahl AS. Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS. 1998;12:1529–1536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rothenberg RB, Long D, Sterk C, et al. The Atlanta urban networks study: a blueprint for endemic transmission. AIDS. 2001;14:2191–2200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wylie JL, Jolly A. Patterns of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(1):14–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mastro TD, de Vincenzi I. Probabilities of sexual HIV-1 transmission. AIDS. 1996; 10(suppl A):S75-S82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Royce RA, Sena A, Cates W, Cohen MS. Sexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(15):1072–1078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vittinghoff E, Bucbinder SP, Judson F, Douglas JMD, MacQueen K. Per contact risk for transmission of HIV associated with four types of homosexual contact. Paper presented at: Fifth Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections; February 1–5, 1998; Chicago, IL.

  20. Borgatti SP, Everett M, Freeman L. Ucinet V for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krackhardt D, Blythe J, McGrath C. Krackplot. Version 3.0. Pittsburgh, Pa: Analytic Technologies; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garnett GP, Hughes JP, Anderson RM, et al. Sexual mixing patterns of patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23(3):248–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta S, Anderson RM, May RM. Networks of sexual contacts: implications for the pattern of spread of HIV. AIDS. 1989;3:807–817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kretzschmar M, Morris M. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math Biosci. 1996;133:165–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kretzschmar M. Sexual network structure and sexually transmitted disease prevention: a modeling perspective. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(10):627–635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson RM, Garnett GP. Mathematical models of the transmission and control of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;27(10):636–643.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Service SK, Blower SM. HIV transmission in sexual networks: an empirical analysis. Proc R Soc London B. 1995;260:237–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown and Company; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Janssen R. Serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic (SAFE): a new prevention strategy to reduce transmission. Paper presented at: Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection: February 4, 2001; Chicago, IL.

  31. DesJarlais DC, Friedman SR. HIV epidemiology and interventions among injecting drug users. Int J STD AIDS. 1996;7(suppl 2):57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Patrick DM, Strathdee SA, Archibald CP, et al. Determinants of HIV seroconversion in injection drug users during a period of rising prevalence in Vancouver. Int J STD AIDS. 1997;8(7):437–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. DesJarlais DC, Marmor M, Friedmann P, et al. HIV incidence among injection drug users in New York City, 1992–1997: evidence for a declining epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(3):352–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999; 26:250–261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rothenberg RB, Trotter RT, Sterk C, Baldwin JA, Pach A, Maxwell C. Heterogeneity in drug-using networks. Paper presented at: 12th World AIDS Conference; June 28–July 3, 1998; Geneva, Switzerland.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff

    Julie Baldwin &  Robert Trotter

  2. Quintus-ential Solutions, Colorado Springs, Colorado

    Stephen Muth (consultant)

  3. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 69 Butler Street SE, 30303, Atlanta, GA

    Richard Rothenberg MD (Professor)

Authors
  1. Richard Rothenberg MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie Baldwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Trotter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stephen Muth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Rothenberg MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothenberg, R., Baldwin, J., Trotter, R. et al. The risk environment for HIV transmission: Results from the Atlanta and Flagstaff network studies. J Urban Health 78, 419–432 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.419

Keywords

Search

Navigation