Abstract
Recurrent crises in corporate governance have altered board practice and created policy pressure to assess the effectiveness of boards. Since the 1990s, boards have faced calls to undertake regular, formal evaluation. Since 2010, the UK Corporate Governance Code has urged large corporations to engage outside parties to conduct them at least every 3 years, a move that other jurisdictions have copied. Despite this policy importance, little research has been conducted into processes or outcomes of board evaluation. This study explores the attitudes of directors on evaluation, whether self-administered or facilitated by others. We find acceptance of the principle but reservations about the value and even honesty in questionnaire-based approaches. We find scepticism about, but also acknowledgement of, the benefits of using outside facilitators, especially for their objectivity and because their interviewing elicits insights into board dynamics. As this practice expands beyond listed companies to non-listed ones, charities, and even governance branches of government, our findings point to a need to professionalise outside facilitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABExcellence. 2014, January. Board Review Code of Practice. A Publication of Advanced Boardroom Excellence. Retrieved November 24, 2017, from http://www.abexcellence.com/board-review-code-of-practice.
Aly, A.H., and M.E. Mansour. 2017. Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Corporate Boards: The Balanced Scorecard Approach. Managerial Auditing Journal 32 (2): 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2016-1358.
Anderson, D.W. 2006. Board Evaluation: Use it To Develop Strength. NACD Directorship 32 (6): 21–22.
Atwater, L., and D. Waldman. 1998. 360 Degree Feedback and Leadership Development. The Leadership Quarterly 9 (4): 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90009-1.
Bailey, B.C., and S.I. Peck. 2013. Boardroom Strategic Decision-Making Style: Understanding the Antecedents. Corporate Governance: An International Review 21 (2): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12008.
Bank of England. 2015, November. The Failure of HBOS plc. UK Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulatory Authority Report. Retrieved November 19, 2015, from http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/publications/reports/hbos.pdf.
Baxter, L.G. 2011. Capture in Financial Regulation: Can We Channel It toward the Common Good. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 21 (1): 175–200.
Bebchuk, L.A., and J.M. Fried. 2003. Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (3): 71–92.
Board & Adminstrator. 2013. Self-evaluation Lets Board Discuss ‘Elephant in the Room’. Board & Administrator for Administrators Only 30 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ban.20105.
Bollich, K.L., K.H. Rogers, and S. Vazire. 2015. Knowing More Than We Can Tell. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (7): 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215583993.
Booth, R., and D. Nordberg. 2018, February. Response to UK Corporate Governance Consultation Paper 2018. Submission to the UK Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/0b954635-be94-470b-af5e-984c26710352/Carey-Group;.aspx.
Brundin, E., and M. Nordqvist. 2008. Beyond Facts and Figures: The Role of Emotions in Boardroom Dynamics. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16 (4): 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00688.x.
Brunzell, T. 2012, February. Board Evaluation and Its Effect on Board Composition and Board Work. Working paper in SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000145.
Cadbury, A. 1992. The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf.
Cadbury, A. 1999. What are the Trends in Corporate Governance? How will They Affect your Company? Long Range Planning 32 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00120-4.
Caputo, D., and D. Dunning. 2005. What you don’t Know: The Role Played by Errors of Omission in Imperfect Self-assessments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (5): 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.09.006.
Charas, S. 2015. Improving Corporate Performance by Enhancing Team Dynamics at the Board Level. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 12 (2): 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2013.35.
Chioatto, U. 2015. A Studied Approach to Board Assessments and Skills Matrices. Governance Directions 67 (7): 415–419.
Church, A.H. 1997. Managerial Self-awareness in High-Performing Individuals in Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (2): 281–292.
Clarke, T., and A. Klettner. 2010, October. Board Effectiveness and Performance: The State of Play on Board Evaluation in Corporate Australia and Abroad. Study Commissioned by The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors and Prepared by The Centre for Corporate Governance, UTS. Retrieved December 4, 2017, from https://www.acsi.org.au/images/stories/ACSIDocuments/generalresearchpublic/10%20Board%20Effectiveness%20%20Performance%20Research%20Paper.pdf.
Conger, J.A., D. Finegold, and E.E. Lawler III. 1998. Appraising Boardroom Performance. Harvard Business Review 76 (1): 136–148.
Conti, T. 2003, May. Quality Assessments for Improvement in Corporate Governance. Paper presented at the American Society for Quality, Kansas City, MO.
Copnell, T. 2010. Schrödinger’s Cat and the Evaluation of Boards. Accountancy Age 2010: 16–17.
Curtis, G. 2007. Conducting an Effective Board Evaluation. NACD Directorship 33 (4): 62–65.
Daily, C.M., and D.R. Dalton. 2003. Looking in the Mirror: Board Evaluation. Journal of Business Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs.2003.28824faf.002.
Del Brio, E.B., T. Yoshikawa, C.E. Connelly, and W.L. Tan. 2013. The Effects of CEO Trustworthiness on Directors’ Monitoring and Resource Provision. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1575-0.
Deloitte. 2014, March. Performance Evaluation of Boards of Directors. A Client Briefing Note from Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/risk/Corporate%20Governance/in-cg-performance-evaluation-of-boards-and-directors-noexp.pdf.
Dulewicz, V., and P. Herbert. 2008. Current Practice of FTSE 350 Boards Concerning the Appointment, Evaluation and Development of Directors, Boards and Committees Post the Combined Code. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2008.017893.
Duval, T.S., and N. Lalwani. 1999. Objective Self-awareness and Causal Attributions for Self-Standard Discrepancies: Changing Self or Changing Standards of Correctness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (10): 1220–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258004.
Earley, P.C. 2002. Redefining Interactions Across Cultures and Organizations: Moving Forward with Cultural Intelligence. Research in Organizational Behavior 24: 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24008-3.
Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279003.
Epstein, M.J., and M.-J. Roy. 2005. Evaluating and Monitoring CEO Performance: Evidence from US Compensation Committee Reports. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 5 (4): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510616604.
European Commission. 2005, February. Commission Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the Role of Non-executive or Supervisory Directors of Listed Companies and on the Committees of the (Supervisory) Board. Commission Recommendation 2005/162/EC. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:052:0051:0063:EN:PDF.
Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866.
Fenwick, M., & E.P.M. Vermeulen. 2018, November. Evaluating the Board of Directors: International Practice. Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2018-6; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Law Working Paper No. 425/2018. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3253929.
Forbes, D.P., and F.J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202133.
FRC. 2003. Combined Code on Corporate Governance. UK Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/frc/Web%20Optimised%20Combined%20Code%203rd%20proof.pdf.
FRC. 2010. The UK Corporate Governance Code. UK Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved May 29, 2010, from http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/Corporate_Governance/UK%20Corp%20Gov%20Code%20June%202010.pdf.
FRC. 2012, February. What Constitutes Compliance Under ‘Comply or Explain’? Report of Discussions Between Companies and Investors. UK Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.frc.org.uk/images/uploaded/documents/FRC%20explanations%20paper%200301121.pdf.
FSA. 2011, December. The Failure of the Royal Bank of Scotland plc. UK Financial Services Authority Report. Retrieved November 19, 2015, from http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/rbs.pdf.
Garratt, B. 1999. Developing Effective Directors and Building Dynamic Boards. Long Range Planning 32 (1): 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00122-8.
Gordon, R. 2015. The Growing Importance and Value of Board Evaluations. New Zealand Management 62 (1): 14–15.
Grant Thornton. 2009, February. Harmony from Discord: Emerging Trends in Governance in the FTSE 350. Corporate Governance Review. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.grant-thornton.co.uk/pdf/Corporate-Governance-Review-2008.pdf.
Grant Thornton. 2011, November. Corporate Governance Review 2011: A Changing Climate, Fresh Challenges Ahead. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from http://www.grant-thornton.co.uk/pdf/Corporate_Governance_Review_2011.pdf.
Grant Thornton. 2016, November. Corporate Governance Review 2016. A Publication of Grant Thornton UK LLP. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.grantthornton.co.uk/globalassets/1.-member-firms/united-kingdom/pdf/publication/2016/2016-corporate-governance-review.pdf.
Groothuis, M. 2011, June. Board Evaluations in Practice: A Practical Take-Out for De Nederlandsche Bank. A Report for the Dutch Central Bank. Retrieved October 29, 2017, from http://arno.uva.nl/document/351646.
Heracleous, L., and L.L. Lan. 2002. Who Wants to be a Competent Director? An Evaluation Tool of Directors’ Knowledge of Governance Principles and Legal Duties. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 2 (4): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700210447650.
Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive Directors. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/higgsreport.pdf.
Huse, M. 2005. Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioural Perspectives of Corporate Governance. British Journal of Management 16 (S1): S65–S79.
Ingley, C.B., and N.T. Van der Walt. 2002. Board Dynamics and the Politics of Appraisal. Corporate Governance: An International Review 10 (3): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00281.
Jauncey, S.P., and D.N. Moseley-Greatwich. 2007. The Validity of Measuring Director and Board Performance: Continuum or Categorisation? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3): 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2007.014317.
Kazanjian, J. 2000. Assessing Boards and Individual Directors. Ivey Business Journal 64 (5): 45–50.
Kenny, R. 2016. Lessons Learned in Board Assessment. Corporate Board 37 (220): 6–9.
Kiel, G.C., and G.J. Nicholson. 2005. Evaluating Boards and Directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (5): 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00455.x.
Leblanc, R. 2002. Assessing Board Performance: 10 Key Factors. Corporate Board 23 (132): 1–6.
Leblanc, R. 2005. Assessing Board Leadership. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (5): 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00457.x.
Leblanc, R., and J. Gillies. 2005. Inside the Boardroom: How Boards Really Work and the Coming Revolution in Corporate Governance. Mississauga, ON: Wiley.
Lichtsteiner, H., and V. Lutz. 2012. Use of Self-assessment by Nonprofit Organization Boards: The Swiss Case. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 22 (4): 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21041.
Likierman, A. 2009, February. Measuring the Success of the Board. Publication of the International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/measuring-the-success-of-the-board.pdf.
London, M., H.H. Larsen, and L.N. Thisted. 1999. Relationships Between Feedback and Self-development. Group and Organization Management 24 (1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199241002.
Long, T. 2006. This Year’s Model: Influences on Board and Director Evaluation. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (6): 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00529.x.
Machold, S., M. Huse, A. Minichilli, and M. Nordqvist. 2011. Board Leadership and Strategy Involvement in Small Firms: A Team Production Approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review 19 (4): 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00852.x.
Martinov-Bennie, N., D.S.B. Soh, and D. Tweedie. 2015. An Investigation into the Roles, Characteristics, Expectations and Evaluation Practices of Audit Committees. Managerial Auditing Journal 30 (8/9): 727–755. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2015-1186.
McNulty, T., A. Pettigrew, G. Jobome, and C. Morris. 2011. The Role, Power and Influence of Company Chairs. Journal of Management and Governance 15 (1): 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9119-4.
Merchant, K.A., and K. Pick. 2010. Blind Spots, Biases, and Other Pathologies in the Boardroom. New York: Business Expert Press.
Minerva Analytics. 2019, February. Board Evaluation: New Research Identifies Opacity and Market Concentration Concerns. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from https://www.manifest.co.uk/downloads/minerva-briefing-board-evaluation-in-europe-2019/.
Minichilli, A., J. Gabrielsson, and M. Huse. 2007. Board Evaluations: Making a Fit Between the Purpose and the System. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (4): 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00591.x.
NACD. 2001. NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Board Evaluation: Improving director effectiveness. National Association of Corporate Directors and Center for Board Leadership. Washington: National Association of Corporate Directors.
Neubauer, F. 1997. A Formal Evaluation of the Chairman of the Board. Corporate Governance: An International Review 5 (3): 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00056.
Nicholson, G.J., G.C. Kiel, and J.A. Tunny. 2012. Board Evaluations: Contemporary Thinking and Practice. In The Sage Handbook of Corporate Governance, ed. T. Clarke and D. Branson, 285–324. London: Sage.
Nordberg, D., & R. Booth, R. 2019a, July. Director Notes: Evaluating boards: A Policy Agenda in Need of Perspective. A Research Report for the Conference Board Inc. Retrieved July 24, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3422733 or https://www.conference-board.org/publications/publicationdetail.cfm?publicationid=8637.
Nordberg, D., and R. Booth. 2019b. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corporate Boards. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 19 (2): 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2018-0275.
Nordberg, D., and T. McNulty. 2013. Creating Better Boards Through Codification: Possibilities and Limitations in UK Corporate Governance, 1992–2010. Business History 55 (3): 348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.712964.
Nordqvist, M., and A. Minichilli. 2009. What Makes Boards in Small Firms Active? In The Value Creating Board: Corporate Governance and Organizational Behaviour, ed. M. Huse, 384–397. Abingdon: Routledge.
NYSE. 2014, December. NYSE: Corporate Governance Guide. Retrieved March 18, 2017, from https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/listing/NYSE_Corporate_Governance_Guide.pdf.
OECD. 2015, November. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing. Retrieved March 26, 2017, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/2615021e.pdf.
Pitcher, H. 2014. Who Evaluates the Evaluators? Governance Newsletter, January, 8–9.
PwC. 2014, October. Trends Shaping Governance and the Board of the Future. PwC’s 2014 Annual Corporate Directors Survey. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/corporate-governance/annual-corporate-directors-survey/assets/annual-corporate-directors-survey-full-report-pwc.pdf.
Rasmussen, J. 2015. Do Board Evaluations Measure Board Effectiveness? International Studies of Management & Organization 45 (1): 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1005999.
Rebeiz, K.S. 2016. Design Guidelines for Boardroom’s Effectiveness: The Case of Fortune 500 Firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 16 (3): 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2015-0104.
Reicher, S., S.A. Haslam, and N. Hopkins. 2005. Social Identity and the Dynamics of Leadership: Leaders and Followers as Collaborative Agents in the Transformation of Social Reality. The Leadership Quarterly 16 (4): 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007.
Roe, M.J. 1994. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ross, S.A. 1973. The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review 63 (2): 134–139.
Roy, M.-J. 2015. Characterizing Performance Evaluation Systems for Corporate Directors. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, 386–393.
Samra-Fredericks, D. 2000. An Analysis of the Behavioural Dynamics of Corporate Governance: A Talk-Based Ethnography of a UK Manufacturing ‘Board-in-Action’. Corporate Governance: An International Review 8 (4): 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00210.
Schaffer, B.S. 2002. Board Assessments of Managerial Performance: An Analysis of Attribution Processes. Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (2): 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210417030.
Schmidt, S.L., and M. Brauer. 2006. Strategic Governance: How to Assess Board Effectiveness in Guiding Strategy Execution. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (1): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00480.x.
Silverman, D. 2017. Doing Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sonnenfeld, J.A. 2002. What Makes Great Boards Great. Harvard Business Review 80 (9): 106–113.
Spencer Stuart. 2017, July. Boardroom Best Practice. Retrieved November 27, 2017, from https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media/bbp2017/bbp2017_ipe.pdf.
Sponbergs, P. 2007. Evaluation of Board Work in Fifteen Companies Belonging to the City of Stockholm. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (2): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00552.x.
Stybel, L.J., and M. Peabody. 2005, Fall. How Should Board Directors Evaluate Themselves? MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-should-board-directors-evaluate-themselves/?article=how-should-board-directors-evaluate-themselves.
UK Parliament. 2018, May. Carillion. Second Joint Report from the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Work and Pensions Committees of Session 2017–19; Tenth Report of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee of Session 2017–19; Twelfth Report of the Work and Pensions Committee of Session 2017–19. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/769/769.pdf.
Van der Walt, N.T., and C.B. Ingley. 2000. Evaluating Board Effectiveness: The Changing Context of Strategic Governance. Journal of Change Management 1 (4): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/738552741.
Vandebeek, A., W. Voordeckers, F. Lambrechts, and J. Huybrechts. 2016. Board Role Performance and Faultlines in Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Formal Board Evaluation. Journal of Family Business Strategy 7 (4): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.10.002.
Waldman, D.A., L.E. Atwater, and D. Antonioni. 1998. Has 360 Degree Feedback Gone Amok? Academy of Management Executive 12 (2): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.650519.
Westphal, J.D., and E.J. Zajac. 1998. The Symbolic Management of Stockholders: Corporate Governance Reforms and Shareholder Reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (1): 127–153.
Wiersema, M.F., and Y. Zhang. 2011. CEO Dismissal: The Role of Investment Analysts. Strategic Management Journal 32 (11): 1161–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.932.
Young, G.J., Y. Stedham, and R.I. Beekun. 2000. Boards of Directors and the Adoption of a CEO Performance Evaluation Process: Agency—And Institutional—Theory Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies 37 (2): 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00181.
Zona, F., and A. Zattoni. 2007. Beyond the Black Box of Demography: Board Processes and Task Effectiveness Within Italian Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (5): 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00606.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Booth, R., Nordberg, D. Self or other: directors’ attitudes towards policy initiatives for external board evaluation. Int J Discl Gov 18, 120–135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00094-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00094-x