Skip to main content
Log in

Medieval sanctuary, gothic entrapment, and the fugitive self in Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad

  • Original Article
  • Published:
postmedieval Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colson Whitehead’s underground railroad is the site of a survival so minimal that it seems to offer no sanctuary from either physical brutality or the legal fictions that reduce Black people to property. His young protagonist, Cora, escapes the plantation in a literal train, hurtling through cold, dank, dark tunnels, in unknown directions, according to a mysterious timetable. Invoking a gothic spatial dynamic, the book obstructs the idealisation of the underground railroad, demystifies its function as permanent refuge, and inhibits empathy. I argue that the medieval legal history of sanctuary—a site of flight, disorientation, and contingent survival—offers conceptual insight into Whitehead’s novel of fugitivity. Medieval sanctuary allows us a perspective from which Whitehead’s dank underground railroad appears as a meaning-making machine, a site where Cora can forge an insistent, if wavering, social personhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Further, Li argues, the novel creates a fantasy of Cora’s basic moral goodness, and it narrates the serial deferral of her bondage until a final happy ending—so that style, character, and structure all partake in the making of a palatable fantasy of miraculous escape.

  2. Scholars have noted the book’s generic instability: Li (2019) and Friedman (2021) cite slave narrative and neo-slave narrative; Matthew Dischinger (2017) calls it ‘speculative satire’ that critiques fantasy; Nihad Farooq (2019) relates the book to utopias.

  3. On Cora’s subjecthood as source of hope, see Friedman (2021, 128). Others locate the novel’s source of possibility in collective action. Farooq (2019) locates hope in the maroon community at Valentine farm; Dischinger (2017) and Li (2019) place the book in relation to collective legacies of racism in America.

  4. Rudolf Otto describes the holy in terms of excess: it is constituted by ‘a clear overplus of meaning’ that exceeds moral and legal systems Otto (1923, 5–7). Sanctuary surpasses legal and even moral judgment: regardless of what  crime people commit, they can survive.

  5. These invaders are denigrated as ‘Saracens,’ who are pagan and black, despite uncertain geographical origins. Sanctuary bolsters Horn’s land claim; one could argue further that sanctuary helps racialise both his enemies and himself. On ‘Saracen’ representations in middle English literature, see Calkin (2005); Cawsey (2009); Speed (1990).

  6. Friedman argues that Whitehead does not portray Cora’s subjectivity as produced by enslavement but that her interiority therefore ‘evades capture on the page.’ Friedman (2021, 128). I find that the book devotes energy to Cora’s gothic enmeshment in the infrastructure she is trying to escape, but that her interiority does emerge in the end.

  7. There was sometimes a racial as well as religious component to sanctuary’s conditions: Jews were not typically granted sanctuary, according to Shoemaker (2011, 71, 160). See also Jordan (2008, 21).

  8. For Agamben, ‘mere life’ or ‘bare life’ is existence absolutely vulnerable to the sovereign, meaningful only as evidence of sovereign power and therefore ‘exposed to an unconditional capacity to be killed’ (1995, 85).

  9. Reviewers grapple with the novel’s balance between flight and recuperation. Winters refers pessimistically to Cora’s ‘utter fugitivity’ (2018, 342). Friedman writes that Cora ‘embodies a fugitive hope-against-hope,’ (2021, 135). For Farooq, however, fugitivity is a source of hope, ‘a being in movement that inaugurates a new ontology of freedom’ (2019, 95).

  10. For Farooq (2019), Valentine Farm’s utopic vision is as impermanent as the model of sanctuary I propose.

  11. Farooq points out that Lander is a DuBoisian figure, arguing against the less radical Washingtonian figure, Mingo. Farooq (2019, 100).

  12. Dischinger’s phrase ‘speculative satire’ captures this ludic / mocking element of the novel, locating it in Lumbly’s ironic indication of the ‘true face of America’ seen in the dark speculative machinery of the railroad. Dischinger (2017, 96).

  13. ‘Cora’ in Greek means daughter, maiden, or girl and is a name for Persephone (Lidell and Scott 1961, 980–981).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1995. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Allen, Elizabeth. 2021. Uncertain Refuge: Sanctuary in the Literature of Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James. 1962. The Fire Next Time. New York: Vintage International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, Michael. 2004. Race and Modernity in Colson Whitehead’s The Intuitionist. In The Holodeck in the Garden: Science and Technology in Contemporary American Fiction, edited by Peter Freese and Charles B. Harris, 163–78. Funkes Grove, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindas, Kenneth J. 1986. Western Music: Bob Nolan and His Songs. Western Historical Quarterly 17 (4): 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [Bracton] 1968. On the Laws and Customs of England, edited by George E. Woodbine, 2:382. Translated by Samuel E. Thorne. Cambridge, MA: The Selden Society in association with the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, https://amesfoundation.law.harvard.edu/Bracton/

  • Calkin, Siobhain Bly. 2005. Saracens and the Making of English Identity: The Auchinleck Manuscript. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawsey, Kathy. 2009. Disorienting Orientalism: Finding Saracens in Strange Places in Late Medieval English Manuscripts. Exemplaria 21 (4): 380–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLombard, Jeannine Marie. 2014. Slave Narratives and U.S. Legal History. In The Oxford Handbook of the African American Slave Narrative, edited by John Ernest. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 67–85.

  • Dinshaw, Carolyn. 2012. How Soon is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dischinger, Matthew. 2017. States of Possibility in Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad. The Global South 11 (1): 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekirch, A. Roger. 2017. American Sanctuary: Mutiny, Martyrdom, and National Identity in the Age of Revolution. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farman, Abou. 2017. In Defense of Sanctuary: The Negation of a Movement. The Baffler. April 16. https://thebaffler.com/latest/in-defense-of-sanctuary-farman

  • Farooq, Nihad M. 2019. ‘A Useful Delusion’: Valentine Farm and the Flight for Freedom. Utopian Studies 30 (1): 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, Eric. 2015. Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Gabriella. 2021. Unsentimental Historicizing: The Neo-Slave Narrative and the Refusal of Feeling. American Literature 93 (1): 115–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence. 2019. M. A History of American Law. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. 2021. The Black Church: This is Our Story, This is Our Song. New York: Penguin.

  • Goddu, Teresa A. 1997. Gothic America: Narrative, History, and Nation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harney, Stefano and Fred Moten. 2013. The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study. New York: Minor Compositions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, Jason. 2016. Slavery and American Gothic: The Ghost of the Future. In American Gothic Culture: An Edinburgh Companion, edited by Joel Faflak and Jason Haslam, 44–59. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzmann, Ronald B., Graham Drake, and Eve Salisbury. 1997. King Horn. In Four Romances of England. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications. https://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/text/salisbury-king-horn

  • Jenkinson, Matthew. 2019. Charles I’s Killers in America: The Lives and Afterlives of Edward Whalley and William Goffe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, William Chester. 2008. A Fresh Look at Medieval Sanctuary. In Law and the Illicit in Medieval Europe, edited by Ruth Mazo Karras, Joel Kaye, and E. Ann Matter, 17–32. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Jordan, William Chester. 2015. From England to France: Felony and Exile in the High Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, Elizabeth Papp. 2019. Felony and the Guilty Mind in Medieval England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, Jane. 1999. Black Society in Spanish Florida. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Stephanie. 2019. Genre Trouble and History’s Miseries in Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad. MELUS 44 (2): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidell, Henry George and Robert Scott. 1961. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 980–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Julian. 2016. New Black Worlds to Know: Colson Whitehead’s “The Underground Railroad.” The New York Review of Books. September 29.

  • McKinley, Michelle. 2014. Standing on Shaky Ground: Criminal Jurisdiction and Ecclesiastical Immunity in Seventeenth-Century Lima. University of California-Irvine Law Review 5 (3): 101–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSheffrey, Shannon. 2017. Seeking Sanctuary: Crime, Mercy, and Politics in English Courts, 1400–1550. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McSheffrey, Shannon. 2019–2020. Sanctuary Seekers in England, 1394–1557. Blog. https://sanctuaryseekers.ca/2020/07/06/undeadking/

  • Morrison, Toni. 1992. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, Jennifer. 2006. The Cultural Myth of the Cowboy, or, How the West Was Won. Americana 5 (1). https://americanpopularculture.com/journal/articles/spring_2006/moskowitz.htm

  • Moten, Fred. 2018. Stolen Life. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obama, Barack. 2015. Remarks by the President in Eulogy for the Honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC. June 26. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/06/26/remarks-president-eulogy-honorable-reverend-clementa-pinckney

  • Otto, Rudolf. 1923. Idea of the Holy. Translated by John W. Harvey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rabben, Linda. 2011. Give Refuge to the Stranger: The Past, Present, and Future of Sancutary. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, Gervase. 1996. Sanctuary and Social Negotiation in Medieval England. In The Cloister and the World, edited by John Blair and Brian Golding, 57–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, Kathryn. 2016. The Perilous Lure of the Underground Railroad. The New Yorker. August 15.

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. New York: Arno Press, 1980.

  • Selzer, Linda. 2009. ‘Instruments More Perfect Than Bodies: Romancing Uplift in Colson Whitehead’s The Intuitionist.African American Review 43 (4): 681–698.

  • Sharpe, Reginald R., ed. and trans. 1908. Calendar of Coroners’ Rolls of the City of London AD 1300–1378. London: Clay & Sons, Ltd.

  • Shoemaker, Karl. 2011. Sanctuary and Crime in the Middle Ages, 400–1500. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, Diane. 1990. The Saracens of King Horn. Speculum 65 (3): 564–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohm, Paul. 2006a. England’s Empty Throne: Usurpation and the Language of Legitimation, 1399–1422. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohm, Paul. 2006b. ‘York’s Paper Crown.’ Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 36 (1): 76–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waligora-Davis, Nicole. 2011. Sanctuary: African Americans and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Lisa Ze. 2018. Fiction and Slavery’s Archive: Memory, Agency, and Finding Home. Reviews in American History 46 (2): 338–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Michael Szalay for incisive conversation and generous reading, and for teaching me about the gothic. I am also grateful to Letizia Mariani for her insight on Cora’s name, and the other students in my Sanctuary graduate seminar (2021) and honors seminar (2020) for the conversations that germinated this essay. Thanks go to Nicole Miller and Montserrat Piera at Temple University for hosting on Zoom in 2021 a talk that developed into this essay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Allen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, E. Medieval sanctuary, gothic entrapment, and the fugitive self in Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad. Postmedieval 14, 149–178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-023-00265-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-023-00265-3

Navigation