Skip to main content
Log in

CO2 emissions in a global container shipping network and policy implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper studies emissions in the global network of CMA-CGM, the world’s third-largest carrier, in an effort to shed light on the environmental impacts of container shipping. We propose a bottom-up framework to quantify emissions inventories using operational data on shipping routes, deployed ships, ports of call and arrival/departure schedules. Emissions inventories are analysed at the worldwide level, as well as at individual ports, transport corridors and regions. Our findings provide insights into containership emissions, and implications for the industry and its policymakers who strive to mitigate the negative externalities of shipping activities. The company’s weekly operations of 200 routes consume 392,313 tonnes of fuel and release 1,226,166 tonnes of CO2. The emissions mainly concentrate on a few strategic passages, regions and ports along the East–West corridor. Hub-and-spoke patterns influence the skewed distribution of in-port emissions. Most of such emissions take place in a small number of key hubs, which attract substantial vessel calls. Traffic concentration highlights the importance of green policies at strategic hubs, to attain the global environmental targets, and to reduce emissions in-port areas. In addition, collaboration between key hub ports and top carriers is necessary to facilitate cleaner transportation. This research also reveals the effects of operational efficiency, mega vessels and slow steaming on cutting carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acciaro, M., T. Vanelslander, C. Sys, C. Ferrari, A. Roumboutsos, G. Giuliano, J.S.L. Lam, and S. Kapros. 2014. Environmental sustainability in seaports: A framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management 41 (5): 480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alphaliner. 2020. Monthly monitor February. Technical report.

  • Bastug, S., H. Haralambides, S. Esmer, and E. Eminoglu. 2022. Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye? Marine Policy 135: 104866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Air Resources Board. 2021. Emissions impact of ships anchored at ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Technical report.

  • Cariou, P. 2011. Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16: 260–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J.J., and P.S. Fischbeck. 1997. Emissions from ships. Science 278 (5339): 823–824.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J.J., P.S. Fischbeck, and S.N. Pandis. 1999. Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (D3): 3457–3470.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J.J., and H.W. Koehler. 2003. Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophycial Research 108 (D20): 4650.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., and S. Cullinane. 2013. Atmospheric emissions from shipping: The need for regulation and approaches to compliance. Transport Review 33 (4): 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., P.H. Tseng, and G. Wilmsmeier. 2016. Estimation of container ship emissions at berth in Taiwan. International Journal of Sustainable Transport 10 (5): 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalsoren, S.B., M.S. Eide, O. Endresen, A. Mjelde, G. Gravir, and I.S.A. Isaksen. 2009. Update on emissions and environmental impacts from the international fleet of ships: The contribution from major ship types and ports. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9 (6): 2171–2194.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Endresen, O., E. Sorgard, H.L. Behrens, P.O. Brett, and I.S.A. Isaksen. 2007. A historical reconstruction of ships’ fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Geophycial Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endresen, O., E. Sorgard, J.K. Sundet, S.B. Dalsoren, I.S.A. Isaksen, T.F. Berglen, and G. Gravir. 2003. Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. Journal of Geophycial Research 108 (D17): 4560.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ENTEC. 2010. UK Ship emission inventory. Technical report.

  • Eyring, V., H.W. Koehler, J.V. Aardenne, and A. Lauer. 2005. Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophycial Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, J., M. Zhu, M. Sha, T. Notteboom, W. Shi, and X. Wang. 2021. Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions. Maritime Economics & Logistics 23: 587–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralambides, H.E. 2019. Gigantism in container shipping, ports and global logistics: A time-lapse into the future. Maritime Economics & Logistics 21: 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulskotte, J.H.J., and H.A.C.D. Gon. 2010. Fuel consumption and associated emissions from seagoing ships at berth derived from an on-board survey. Atmospheric Environment 44: 1229–1236.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization – IMO. 2000. Study of greenhouse gas emissions from ships. Trondheim: Marintek.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization – IMO. 2015. Third IMO greenhouse gas study 2014. Suffolk: Micropress Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization – IMO. 2020. Fourth IMO GHG study 2020. Delft: CE Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalkanen, J.P., A. Brink, J. Kalli, H. Pettersson, J. Kukkonen, and T. Stipa. 2009. A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and its application in the Baltic Sea area. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9: 9209–9223.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalkanen, J.P., L. Johansson, and J. Kukkonen. 2016. A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16: 71–84.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kindberg, L. 2012. Improving vessel and supply chain fuel efficiency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency archive. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-09/documents/kindberg.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  • Lam, J.S.L., and T. Notteboom. 2014. The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews 34 (2): 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.C., J.S.L. Lam, and P.T.W. Lee. 2016. Asian economic integration and maritime CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 43: 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List. 2021. Suez Canal remains blocked despite efforts to refloat grounded Ever Given. Technical report.

  • Maloni, M., J.A. Paul, and M.G. Gligor. 2013. Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers. Maritime Economics & Logistics 15: 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/ITF. 2015. ITF transport outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing/ITF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, H.R., M. Winther, T. Ellermann, J. Christensen, and M. Plejdrup. 2009. Ship emissions and air pollution in Denmark—Present situation and future scenarios. CiteSeerX archive. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.617.9019&rep=rep1&type=pdf Accessed 20 Aug 2021.

  • Papaefthimiou, S., A. Maragkogianni, and K. Andriosopoulos. 2016. Evaluation of cruise ships emissions in the Mediterranean basin: The case of Greek Ports. International Journal of Sustainable Transport 10: 985–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port of Gothenburg. 2020. Sustainable report. Technical report.

  • Song, S. 2014. Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port. Atmospheric Environment 82: 288–297.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starcrest. 2016. Port of Los Angeles—Inventory of air emission 2015. Technical report.

  • Tran, N.K., and H.D. Haasis. 2015. An empirical study of fleet expansion and growth of ship size in container liner shipping. International Journal of Production Economics 159: 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, N.K., H.D. Haasis, and T. Buer. 2017. Container shipping route design incorporating the costs of shipping, inland/feeder transport, inventory and CO2 emission. Maritime Economics and Logistics 19 (4): 667–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, N.K., and J.S.L. Lam. 2022. Effects of container ship speed on CO2 emission, cargo lead time and supply chain costs. Research in Transportation Business and Management 43: 100723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, N.K., J.S.L. Lam, H. Jia, and R. Adland. 2022. Emissions from container vessels in the port of Singapore. Maritime Policy and Management 49: 306–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzannatos, E. 2010. Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus—Greece. Atmospheric Environment 44: 400–407.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2021. Review of maritime transport. New York, Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalba, G., and E.D. Gemechu. 2011. Estimating GHG emissions of marine ports—The case of Barcelona. Energy Policy 39 (3): 1363–1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., J.J. Corbett, and J. Firestone. 2007. Modeling energy use and emissions from North American Shipping: Application of the ship traffic, energy, and environment model. Environmental Science and Technology 41 (9): 3226–3232.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winthera, M., J.H. Christensena, M.S. Plejdrupa, R.S. Ravnb, O.F. Eriksson, and H.O. Kristensen. 2014. Emission inventories for ships in the arctic based on satellite sampled AIS data. Atmospheric Environment 91: 1–14.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D.Q., S.H. Kwan, T. Lu, Q.Y. Fu, J.M. Cheng, D.G. Streets, Y.M. Wu, and J.J. Li. 2007. An emission inventory of marine vessels in Shanghai in 2003. Environmental Science and Technology 41 (15): 5183–5190.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yau, P.S., S.C. Lee, J.J. Corbett, C. Wang, Y. Cheng, and K.F. Ho. 2012. Estimation of exhaust emission from ocean-going vessels in Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment 431: 299–306.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., J.S.L. Lam, and N.K. Tran. 2021. Emission accounting of shipping activities in the era of big data. International Journal of Shipping Transport and Logistics 13 (1/2): 156–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., Y. Zhang, W. Ma, Q. Fu, X. Yang, C. Li, B. Zhou, Q. Yu, and L. Chen. 2013. Characteristics and ship traffic source identification of air pollutants in China's largest port. Atmospheric Environment 64: 277–286.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., K.X. Li, W. Shi, and J.S.L. Lam. 2017. Incentive policy for reduction of emission from ships: A case study of China. Marine Policy 86: 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmine Siu Lee Lam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, N.K., Lam, J.S.L. CO2 emissions in a global container shipping network and policy implications. Marit Econ Logist 26, 151–167 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00242-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00242-w

Keywords

Navigation