Skip to main content
Log in

A Letter from China: Social Control in China—A Formal or an Informal Mechanism?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

Many think that formal social control refers to a criminal justice system in which there are rather many state organs/agencies (eg, police, courts, prisons) to maintain public order, while informal social control refers to the broader social system. This paper argues that China has traditionally established a social control system by making use of the societal inner layer (belief controls such as Confucianism and socialization programmes) and the exterior layer (structural controls such as the baojia system and auxiliary institutions, or the work-unit, danwei), and that this system has continued in the People's Republic. Although this mechanism is generally recognized as an informal social control, it is argued that, historically as well as theoretically, China has regarded this mechanism as constituting formal social control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toby, H. A Letter from China: Social Control in China—A Formal or an Informal Mechanism?. Crime Prev Community Saf 3, 71–85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140083

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140083

Keywords

Navigation